• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Abortion Award From University in Canada Proves Costly

Riprorin

Banned
Abortion Award From University in Canada Proves Costly
by Maria Vitale Gallagher
LifeNews.com Staff Writer
May 12, 2005

Toronto, Canada (LifeNews.com) -- The University of Western Ontario?s decision to award an honorary degree to an abortion practitioner has proven costly to the college.
A two million-dollar bequest has been withdrawn and other alumni are threatening to sever their ties with the school, after Western Ontario decided to honor abortionist Henry Morgentaler. Morgentaler, who runs abortion facilities in several Canadian provinces, is one of ten people selected by the university?s senate committee for the honorary awards. He is scheduled to receive the doctor of law degree June 16.

In protest, several donors have retracted their pledges, including the two million-dollar bequest from an unnamed retired business executive.

?I don?t think there?s any doubt that with literally thousands of alumni upset that it has some effect,? said Don McDougall, chair of the university?s board of governors.

However, the university is standing firm in its decision.

?(The senate committee) considered the many ramifications of this honorary degree, decided that Dr. Morgentaler merited it and made the decision that it should be awarded,? said president Paul Davenport.

But that has not stopped pro-life activists from raising objections.

McDougall sent a letter to the university community saying that he believes the decision ?will depreciate the honor, adversely affect fundraising?(and) do irreparable harm to the reputation of the university.?

McDougall told the news media, ?From Day 1 I felt that it was a mistake from the reputation of the university point of view.?

However, Davenport claims that the decision will not have a negative impact on fundraising in the long term. In fact, he said one alumnus sent a check for $10,000 in support of the university?s decision.

?I?ve been president here for 11 years. Every time there is a controversy, whether it?s over building a new residence or a demonstration in the students center, I get statements from people who say, ?Well, I?m not giving this? or ?I?m not giving that,?? Davenport told the media.

Davenport said the university just finished a $327-million fundraising campaign. ?I?m confident that we will continue to raise money from people who believe in us,? he added.

Earlier this year, Henry Lamb, former vice-president of the Campaign Life Coalition, told the London Free Press the decision to give the abortionist an honorary degree was ?unbelievable.?

"He's the last person I'd think would be on anybody's list whether you're pro-life or not," Lamb said. "I have a real hard time with it because the (abortion) issue hasn't even been properly debated in this country, and they want to make Henry Morgentaler a doctor of laws when there is no law," Lamb added.

Link

It looks like the university is going to pay a price for its poor judgement.

Congrats to the alums and benefactors for protesting and withdrawing their financial support of the university.
 
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos
 
Riprorin, why do you think abortion is wrong given that God killed babies? The old testament doesn't even ask for indemnification when a woman loses a fetus. What's the big deal?
 
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos

No, you are not pro-choice.. You are Pro-YOURchoice.. If you were pro-choice, you would accept Riprorin's choice to be against abortion.. but you don't.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos

No, you are not pro-choice.. You are Pro-YOURchoice.. If you were pro-choice, you would accept Riprorin's choice to be against abortion.. but you don't.

That makes almost no sense.
 
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos

No, you are not pro-choice.. You are Pro-YOURchoice.. If you were pro-choice, you would accept Riprorin's choice to be against abortion.. but you don't.

That makes almost no sense.

Makes perfect sense to me.
 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos

No, you are not pro-choice.. You are Pro-YOURchoice.. If you were pro-choice, you would accept Riprorin's choice to be against abortion.. but you don't.

Bullsh!t. Who has NOT accepted his position? Yep, thought so. Nice try, I think we all accept his position, acceptance has nothing to do with agreement. Point is, no one wants to hear in several times a week in new OP after new OP. They should be consolidated or he should be banned. Dave keeps his economy posts in one thread, RIP should be no different. But as he has made clear time and time again, he is special, his kids are special, and they all deserve special treatment.
 
Originally posted by: RabidMongoose
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos

No, you are not pro-choice.. You are Pro-YOURchoice.. If you were pro-choice, you would accept Riprorin's choice to be against abortion.. but you don't.

That makes almost no sense.

 
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Last Rezort
We know your position but there is really nothing to debate here.
I am pro choice, nuff said. But good for you for telling that a womans body and choice are of no concern to you. Cudos

No, you are not pro-choice.. You are Pro-YOURchoice.. If you were pro-choice, you would accept Riprorin's choice to be against abortion.. but you don't.

Well when Rip decides to have a baby, he's more than welcome to....
 
Originally posted by: Riprorin

However, Davenport claims that the decision will not have a negative impact on fundraising in the long term. In fact, he said one alumnus sent a check for $10,000 in support of the university?s decision.

?I?ve been president here for 11 years. Every time there is a controversy, whether it?s over building a new residence or a demonstration in the students center, I get statements from people who say, ?Well, I?m not giving this? or ?I?m not giving that,?? Davenport told the media.

Davenport said the university just finished a $327-million fundraising campaign. ?I?m confident that we will continue to raise money from people who believe in us,? he added.

Link

It looks like the university is going to pay a price for its poor judgement.

Congrats to the alums and benefactors for protesting and withdrawing their financial support of the university.

It looks like you have a problem reading your own biased findings.

So who has the poor judgement??? 😕
 
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Riprorin

However, Davenport claims that the decision will not have a negative impact on fundraising in the long term. In fact, he said one alumnus sent a check for $10,000 in support of the university?s decision.

?I?ve been president here for 11 years. Every time there is a controversy, whether it?s over building a new residence or a demonstration in the students center, I get statements from people who say, ?Well, I?m not giving this? or ?I?m not giving that,?? Davenport told the media.

Davenport said the university just finished a $327-million fundraising campaign. ?I?m confident that we will continue to raise money from people who believe in us,? he added.

Link

It looks like the university is going to pay a price for its poor judgement.

Congrats to the alums and benefactors for protesting and withdrawing their financial support of the university.

It looks like you have a problem reading your own biased findings.

So who has the poor judgement??? 😕

2,000,000 > 10,000 ????????



 
Back
Top