Abit BX6 bios problems

FooDog

Member
Oct 18, 2001
60
0
0
I've just recently blown some life in my secondary system by adding a new processor, video card and more ram. The most recent addition was the cpu very much thanks to UPS slow operating procedures. As soon as I installed the nes cpu I ran into a few things I cannot explain myself. First of all, the system always boots at the default CPU level [233 MHz] when having instlled a new processor, but the funny thing is that it boots as a PII at 589MHz, not as a celeron, and as far as I know 589 doe not correspond to any set clock fsb multipileer combo.
Nevertheless, when I changed it to a custom setting with FSB @ 112 and the multiplier @ 5.5 with the speed error hold disabled [the highest settings the bios would let me do], the system boots at 962MHz - still a PII when it really should be a celeron @ 671 MHz. What adds to the mess is that peripheral software such as 3DMark registeres it as a celeron @1009 MHz.
Obviosly I figured I had a bios problem and tried to install the recent version. Doing that I got a I immidiately got a write error. To aviod this I thought it be best to scale down the bios legacy. I was able to install bios updates for the BX6 up to the bxhv-update dated 01/25/99, after that all other updates suffered from write errors. Presently I am clueless, what the fck is going on heree. Any advice on the mater would be very helpful.
Oh, other than the bios miss it's running like a champ compared to before, so 3Dmark might be on target as far as indentifying the clock speed and the processor, but there must be some way I can sort this out. Any advice on the matter would be helpful

System spec's:
Intel Celeron 900MHz
Abit BX6 rev 1.0
Asus slotket [latest rev, forgot which one]
kingston PC-133 256 MB RAM
The rest should be dismissable.





 

FooDog

Member
Oct 18, 2001
60
0
0
OK, for your your own convenience, try to read this in patwa if it makes more sense that that.
I already did!! Read the entire post! I tried to update w/ the latest bios but all I got got was more than a handful of write errors. Like I said in the post, updating the bios was the first thing that came to mind but that didn't solve anything.
 

AkumaX

Lifer
Apr 20, 2000
12,643
3
81
hah! sorry, the way i read it made it sound like you couldnt update to HV bios, whao i am smoking crack! maybe you should try switches w/ the awdflash.exe, or trying a different cpu to update it with instead. you're not o/cing while updating right? :D
 

nj

Senior member
Mar 15, 2001
802
0
76
The multiplier is locked at 9x. It may read 5.5 in bios, but your really at 9x. You o/c'd the fsb to 112 x 9 = 1008. 3dmark 2001 got the correct cpu reading. You seem good to go without even needing to flash your bios.

The whole bx series wasn't originally designed to go this high, so your going to run into POST error readings when booting. My bh6 used to tell me my celeron 533a @ 800 was a pII @ 756 or some such crap. What matters is that you can run windows stabily and use a program (like this one) to find out what you are really running at.

If you really want to try to get your correct reading at bootup, try flashing without o/c'ing.
 

FooDog

Member
Oct 18, 2001
60
0
0
I finally succeded installing the latest bios [QS]. All it took was a different boot disk... I guess the old one was corrupt. However, I still have the same bios problem. It refuses to recognize the procesor as a celeron. Even though abit claims that the this bios revision has that capability.
Anyway, there is little to cry over, the system runs stabile @ 1009 Mhz [FSB 112.2} and my secondary rig has yet again become useful. I can live with the post descrepancy...
Thanks for all your input.
 

Garet Jax

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2000
6,369
0
71
FooDog,

Something you may want to try is to reset all the BIOS settings, boot into Windows fully one time, shut down, restart and OC again.

It is always good to restore defaults after a BIOS flash before making mods.
 

oldfart

Lifer
Dec 2, 1999
10,207
0
0
Thats wierd. I have a BH6 with a C900 @ 112 FSB, 1008 MHz. If I dont overclock, it posts as a Celeron 901. If overclocked, it posts as a Celeron 1008. The BX6 and BH6 are very similar. The BIOS is almost the same. My sister has my old BX6 with a PII 333 @ 400. Over Thanksgiving, I'll upgrade it to a C900 @ 1008, QS BIOS. It's a couple weeks out, but if I remember, I'll post how it goes.