Originally posted by: khurios2000
Originally posted by: Gary Key
E6600 Testing Update
gary,
on memset the mem freq read 687Mhz? bugs?
Yes, Memset has been showing several of the 680i/650i boards at 298Mhz when they are actually at 400Mhz.
Originally posted by: khurios2000
Originally posted by: Gary Key
E6600 Testing Update
gary,
on memset the mem freq read 687Mhz? bugs?
just seems to be a few boards, maybe try another?Originally posted by: Binky
Can't take the hissing. It's going back. Seems like a really nice board otherwise.
uGuru usually works quite nicely, I miss it when I go to an Asus, Gigabyte etc.Although...uGuru...what a pain in the ass. They really need to make a proper uninstall for this POS software. If you happen to get the install fubar'd, you are screwed. Never did get the fan control working properly. Made me really miss speedfan (which doesn't work much at all on this board).
It's not been out for anything like 3 months & I think that calling it problem-plagued is a bit of an exagerration (particularly as there are betas available that resolve virtually all of the problems).Originally posted by: cyburzaki
I asked abit why they didn't seem to be supporting the QuadGT, suggesting that a problem-plagued but high-potential board having just one official BIOS over three and a half months didn't make sense.
I agree, all boards exhibit problems, and many of the QuadGT's have already been addressed by beta BIOS releases. And I will also add that I'm not even qualified to discuss the board on an experiential level, since I don't own one. But I've considered getting one, except for what I still perceive as a paucity of rigorous up-front OFFICIAL support for the board. Maybe I'm just being overly critical, but when I see the one and only official BIOS for the QuadGT is dated December 11, 2006 (which prompted my time reference), I can't help but get the feeling that abit's BIOS coding team could be working on a more accelerated basis to resolve issues. By contrast, the Gigabyte DS3 got 10 official BIOS updates in its first five and a half months. The Asus P5B-E got five over the same time frame. And my impression is that neither of those boards was plagued by the same severity or number of central issues that initially afflicted the QuadGT.Originally posted by: Heidfirst
It's not been out for anything like 3 months & I think that calling it problem-plagued is a bit of an exagerration (particularly as there are betas available that resolve virtually all of the problems).Originally posted by: cyburzaki
I asked abit why they didn't seem to be supporting the QuadGT, suggesting that a problem-plagued but high-potential board having just one official BIOS over three and a half months didn't make sense.
Yes, it's not 100% perfect but show me a board that doesn't have complaints?
Originally posted by: Heidfirst
if we do I know a good starter guide that I'm sure that i can get permission to copy & post.
Originally posted by: humanure
I'm really tempted to order this board, even with the issues it has. Between this and a p5b deluxe.
Originally posted by: humanure
Do they have the RAID issues fixed with b08 using a SATA dvd drive? I tried the b06 BIOS, seemed to lock the multiplier at 6, so I switched back to 1.0.
Originally posted by: yes
humanure did you get a chance to test with an E6600? I guess that might get you higher for the same voltage you use now.
LiQiCE too bad for you. I've got a L29, but my P5WDH & P5B before that, are awful in the droop.
I notice from screen shots, this board is ~0.04 droop on load. Has that been your experience or better/worse?
Originally posted by: yes
humanure did you get a chance to test with an E6600? I guess that might get you higher for the same voltage you use now.
LiQiCE too bad for you. I've got a L29, but my P5WDH & P5B before that, are awful in the droop.
I notice from screen shots, this board is ~0.04 droop on load. Has that been your experience or better/worse?
