- Jul 9, 2004
- 2,019
- 0
- 0
Up until today, I had an XP/M that would do 2.65 if I really felt like pushing it for benching. The higheset 3dmark01 run I managed to make with it and my 9700TX was 19.7k, running the RAM at 2.0-3-2. Today, I got a Newcastle core
() 3400+, and managed, at stock clocks, to hit 20.3k with RAM only at 2.5-3-3 2T, 20.3k. I am sure that with a bit of OCing (using the stock Prescott HSF, lol), I will hit something a bit better than that - 23k maybe?
Anyway, 2.65 would be rated at 3854+ (scaling linearly from the 3200+), so this proves that the A64 is a LOT faster per clock than the AXP.
If you can manage to get one for not much money (for the upgrade, counting mobo, I am only going to spend about $120 total), DO IT. You will not regret it.
Anyway, 2.65 would be rated at 3854+ (scaling linearly from the 3200+), so this proves that the A64 is a LOT faster per clock than the AXP.
If you can manage to get one for not much money (for the upgrade, counting mobo, I am only going to spend about $120 total), DO IT. You will not regret it.
