Sorry if this has been posted before...I'm new. =)
I was going to order my new computer over the weekend, via Newegg, and there was one thing still bothering me. Is the 4000+ plus really so much better as to warrant a $100 price boost? As far as I can see, they are the same, but the 4000+ has a 1MB L2 cache, versus the 3800+'s 512KB. In all the tests and benchmarks I saw online, it made little difference, if any. Also, XbitLabs's overclocking test put the 3800+ past the capabilties of the FX-55, which costs about $450 more than the 3800+.
So my question was...is the 4000+ a waste of money?
I was going to order my new computer over the weekend, via Newegg, and there was one thing still bothering me. Is the 4000+ plus really so much better as to warrant a $100 price boost? As far as I can see, they are the same, but the 4000+ has a 1MB L2 cache, versus the 3800+'s 512KB. In all the tests and benchmarks I saw online, it made little difference, if any. Also, XbitLabs's overclocking test put the 3800+ past the capabilties of the FX-55, which costs about $450 more than the 3800+.
So my question was...is the 4000+ a waste of money?