- Oct 10, 2000
- 25,696
- 1
- 0
A123 files for bankruptcy
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-...tery-maker-a123-systems-files-bankruptcy.html
Wah wah
Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romneyhttp://topics.bloomberg.com/mitt-romney/ said last month that Obama has picked “losers” for alternative-energy loans and grants.
This is another failure of the 1%.
What happened Job Creators?
Where's the jobs?
I bet all the money is safely in offshore bank accounts of the rich 1% execs.
These "startups" are mostly oil company and conservative plants. Their entire goal isn't to make car batteries or alternative energy solutions. Their goal is to fail and make alternative energy solutions unattainable, and to get Romney elected. Obama got played.
It's not surprising that the usual suspects are cheering for the "failure" of American companies, and against America taking a lead role in green energy, inevitably to become one of the biggest growth industries of the next century. Meanwhile, according to the story in the OP, a Chinese company is eager to invest as much as $465 million in A123. Why is that, I wonder? What do they know that the O'bashers don't? My guess is that aside from not being blinded by partisan hatred, they also lack the American greed queens' fixation on instant gratification. They're looking longer term, and they're confident it's an investment that will pay off.
This is another failure of the 1%.
What happened Job Creators?
Where's the jobs?
I bet all the money is safely in offshore bank accounts of the rich 1% execs.
29 out of 33 companies are still on track to pay off the loans. Risk is an inherent part of any investment and there are bound to be failures. Even still, 87% of the loans so far are still good which is a good investment success rate considering VCs are much lower.
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/10/05/fact-check-half-of-fed-funded-green-companies-bankrupt/
29 out of 33 companies are still on track to pay off the loans. Risk is an inherent part of any investment and there are bound to be failures. Even still, 87% of the loans so far are still good which is a good investment success rate considering VCs are much lower.
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/10/05/fact-check-half-of-fed-funded-green-companies-bankrupt/
29 out of 33 companies are still on track to pay off the loans.
Risk is an inherent part of any investment and there are bound to be failures. Even still, 87% of the loans so far are still good which is a good investment success rate considering VCs are much lower.
http://fuelfix.com/blog/2012/10/05/fact-check-half-of-fed-funded-green-companies-bankrupt/
You wouldn't know this by the lying Republicans especially the ones on here.
Or by your bullsh*t, retard. Your first post in this thread you celebrate the company's demise.You wouldn't know this by the lying Republicans especially the ones on here.
Now that's something you don't hear every day. Obama could have used such a retort in the debate.
I'm not sure why anyone would be happy about this, or consider it 'good' news.
This is another failure of the 1%.
What happened Job Creators?
Where's the jobs?
I bet all the money is safely in offshore bank accounts of the rich 1% execs.
I really love electric motors - I have a degree as an electrical engineer and I find the whole concept of electric motors to be pretty fascinating. Along those lines, about 8 years ago I started flying electric radio controlled model airplanes. At first I started by winding my own motors, but I soon found that batteries were as important, if not more important, than the motor. To this day, in my mind A123 batteries are the best batteries available - except in terms of power/weight. But if you are looking for a battery that you can charge and discharge quickly, that has really good electrical characteristics, and pretty good power/weight, and that don't explode when you crash (like lipolys are prone to do), A123's are as good as I know of. There's a whole bunch of electric model helicopter pilots that I know who won't use anything other than A123's.
That said, I was always disappointed by how hard they were to buy. Back when they were first released, I contacted A123 directly and asked how I could buy their cells and they aimed me at a super-expensive development kit. The "best" way to get them was to take apart 18V DeWalt cordless drill battery packs (google "DeWalt A123" for all the instructions). But that was expensive - DeWalt stuff isn't cheap in general, and buying a name-brand cordless drill battery pack simply to take it apart to get the cells inside seemed like a stupid way to do it. While I recognize that end-user customer service is hard and expensive, I remain disappointed in A123's management that they never made their products more readily available to homebrew electric builders. Despite one phone call, and several emails, I could never get A123 to sell anything to me - or to tell me how to get what I wanted through other companies that resold A123 cells. For my really large battery installation at home (60V 80Ah), I use Thunder Sky batteries (Chinese) because they actually sell batteries to people.
You guys can talk conspiracy theories, and the Obama presidency's culpability (or otherwise), but from my perspective the main problem A123 had was that they didn't handle the manufacturing ramp from initial concept to high-volume manufacturing very well, and they had quality control issues (see the big recall they did last year). They were pooly managed, and it's a real shame because their cells remain the best that I know of for certain applications.