A Wedding Cake For Fido & Fluffy But Not For Dave & Charlie?

[Paladin3]

This thread is a perfect example of why democracy doesn't work. Give every asshat a voice/vote and they just use it to prove how ignorant they are.

 

[her209]

I didn't know there was a right to have anyone you want make you a wedding cake.

The cake shop is a business that makes cakes for customers so there goes your "to have anyone you want to make you a cake". Don't want to make cakes, don't have a cake shop. Sure they can pick and choose who they makes cakes for but they can't discriminate based on certain characteristics.

A wedding is an event in which society approves of your union. Forcing someone to provide a wedding cake is tantamount to forcing them to approve of the union.

Biggest load of bull ever. The only requirements to a marriage are two unmarried people. Society has no say whatsoever. I guess having to make cars that might be driven by a gay couple is tantamount to approving of homosexuality too?

 

[werepossum]

The cake shop is a business that makes cakes for customers so there goes your "to have anyone you want to make you a cake". Don't want to make cakes, don't have a cake shop. Sure they can pick and choose who they makes cakes for but they can't discriminate based on certain characteristics.

Biggest load of bull ever. The only requirements to a marriage are two unmarried people. Society has no say whatsoever. I guess having to make cars that might be driven by a gay couple is tantamount to approving of homosexuality too?

I believe that marriage is a sacred covenant only between a man and a woman. Or between two dogs. 😀

 

[nehalem256]

The cake shop is a business that makes cakes for customers so there goes your "to have anyone you want to make you a cake". Don't want to make cakes, don't have a cake shop. Sure they can pick and choose who they makes cakes for but they can't discriminate based on certain characteristics.

Which is exactly my point. They can pick and choose who to make cakes for unless it makes liberals butthurt.

And then liberals are trying to turn around and say they aren't forcing their beliefs on others because THERE IS A LAW (that they passed)🙄

Biggest load of bull ever. The only requirements to a marriage are two unmarried people.

Or dogs bro. Read the story.

Society has no say whatsoever.

I think this is the biggest load of bull. Society inherently has a say in marriage. This is why you get priest/village elder/justice of the peace/seacaptain to preside over the ceremony.

It seems like you have no idea what a marriage is.

I guess having to make cars that might be driven by a gay couple is tantamount to approving of homosexuality too?

So you don't understand what a wedding is either.

Selling someone a vehicle is not a ceremony about approving of their lifestyle. Now if they request you paint swastikas on the car and you agree...

 

[nehalem256]

I believe that marriage is a sacred covenant only between a man and a woman. Or between two dogs. 😀

I think the difference is two dogs getting married is so absurd it is obviously a joke.

At least that is what they keep saying in Discussion Club...

 

[fskimospy]

It's amazing that at this point you can safely assume that any thread that involves women, abortion or marriage will have devolved into a nehalem vs. the world dogpile.

 

[zsdersw]

It's amazing that at this point you can safely assume that any thread that involves women, abortion or marriage will have devolved into a nehalem vs. the world dogpile.

I'd say betting on "the world" is the safest bet one can make.

 

[SlickSnake]

I just had to chime in and say nehalem256 and I are GETTING MARRIED!!!

And we are using Masterpiece Cake Shop and NOT TELLING THEM WHO IT'S FOR!!!

Then we are adding our own his and his statue on the top and then signing the cake with our wizz and then crapping on it, and then maybe a little projectile vomit on it, and then eating it and filming it all for youtube!

2guys1cake will be the link!

That should get them a lot of new business I bet!

 

[etrigan420]

I just had to chime in and say nehalem256 and I are GETTING MARRIED!!!

And we are using Masterpiece Cake Shop and NOT TELLING THEM WHO IT'S FOR!!!

Then we are adding our own his and his statue on the top and then signing the cake with our piss and then crapping on it, and then maybe a little projectile vomit on it, and then eating it and filming it all for youtube!

2guys1cake will be the link!

That should get them a lot of new business I bet!

ABORT! ABORT! well, only if he's really into it...

 

[Smoblikat]

LOL@Liberals

Its OK to force people to accept your beliefs, but as soon as they try to hold some values theyre evil.

These fucking morons are in office...............

 

[soulcougher73]

Marriage is just a contract. There is no requirement for people getting a same-sex wedding to be of a particular sexual orientation.

You really say the dumbest shit. You have one fucked up brain that does not work properly.

 

[soulcougher73]

This is a private business and they can discriminate. They should have accepted the order for more money but it's their choice.

Nice attempt by the OP to attack Christianity.

You guys make it so easy. It's almost as if you want to be attacked with the crap you say and believe.

 

[soulcougher73]

Apparently you have never heard of PRIVATE PROPERTY.

And apparently you have never heard of certain laws of the land that dont care about your private property.

 

[nehalem256]

You really say the dumbest shit. You have one fucked up brain that does not work properly.

If you think Im wrong please point to the legal statute showing that?

I am simply following the logic that liberals have presented. You are just getting butt-hurt that it is going in the wrong hole 😛

 

[soulcougher73]

If you think Im wrong please point to the legal statute showing that?

I am simply following the logic that liberals have presented. You are just getting butt-hurt that it is going in the wrong hole 😛

http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellit...goBlobs&blobwhere=1251741381222&ssbinary=true

Page 4 of the PDF. Can you shut up now?

 

[nehalem256]

http://www.colorado.gov/cs/Satellit...goBlobs&blobwhere=1251741381222&ssbinary=true

Page 4 of the PDF. Can you shut up now?

And that defines a same-sex marriage as only occurring between homosexuals where?

The woman discriminated against a same-sex wedding not against homosexuals.

Also from your link

The state recently amended the Colorado Anti-Discrimination Act (CADA) by passing the
Sexual Orientation Employment Discrimination Act (SOEDA)

...

May not make pre-employment inquiries into an applicant’s sexual preference.
 May not have separate lines of progression or seniority systems for employees of
different sexual orientation.
 May not express a preference for a particular sexual orientation in job advertisements.
 Must allow each employee to dress according to the gender the employee identifies with,
even if the employer has a gender-specific dress code.

 

[soulcougher73]

And that defines a same-sex marriage as only occurring between homosexuals where?

The woman discriminated against a same-sex wedding not against homosexuals.

Also from your link

 

[shadow9d9]

LOL@Liberals

Its OK to force people to accept your beliefs, but as soon as they try to hold some values theyre evil.

These fucking morons are in office...............

If they don't want to serve blacks, then they shouldn't have to! Fucking liberals! Am I doing it right?

 

[nehalem256]

If they don't want to serve blacks, then they shouldn't have to! Fucking liberals! Am I doing it right?

Well given that liberals insisted that SSM wouldn't affect straight people it is certainly lying liberals.

 

[soulcougher73]

Well given that liberals insisted that SSM wouldn't affect straight people it is certainly lying liberals.

Let me know when you start to feel the gay tingle. I'll be waiting.

But since you are ok with discriminating im going to start a national campaign for every business to have a sign that says "No Nehalem256 allowed". Some will point and laugh, others will talk behind your back, and some will cause you physical harm because of who you are. But you cant help who you are. You were born Nehalem256. But we dont care. We will judge and persecute and discrimate against you freely because you are a sinner.

 

[nehalem256]

Let me know when you start to feel the gay tingle. I'll be waiting.

But since you are ok with discriminating im going to start a national campaign for every business to have a sign that says "No Nehalem256 allowed". Some will point and laugh, others will talk behind your back, and some will cause you physical harm because of who you are. But you cant help who you are. You were born Nehalem256. But we dont care. We will judge and persecute and discrimate against you freely because you are a sinner.

I have no problem with anyone who objects to my marrying anyone/anything to not be forced to perform services for such a wedding.

Its pretty simple.

We aren't talking about buying food. We are not talking about employment.

We are talking about forcing people to support SS weddings.

And again. Still waiting for the law that says same-sex marriages can only be between gay people... there is nothing to stop 2 straight men from marrying. After all marriage is just a contract.

 

[nehalem256]

Also still waiting for the answer to how liberals are not massive liars for saying legalizing SSM would not affect anyone and then suing people for not support SSM.

 

[fskimospy]

Also still waiting for the answer to how liberals are not massive liars for saying legalizing SSM would not affect anyone and then suing people for not support SSM.

Because anti-discrimination laws are not dependent on the legality of same sex marriage. You can't discriminate against gay people having a wedding regardless of whether or not that wedding is state sanctioned.

Still waiting for the answer as to how you're so completely ignorant about basic facts despite spending countless hours arguing about them. My guess is probably a combination of stupidity and mental illness.

 

[soulcougher73]

And again. Still waiting for the law that says same-sex marriages can only be between gay people... there is nothing to stop 2 straight men from marrying. After all marriage is just a contract.

It's common knowledge to the rest of the world that when someone says SSM they mean gay marriage. They describe the same thing. Obviously this shows that you are not part of the normal world as you do not understand the basics.

But if you want to start a national debate about 2 straight men marrying each other have at it. See what kind of support you get.

 

[nehalem256]

Because anti-discrimination laws are not dependent on the legality of same sex marriage. You can't discriminate against gay people having a wedding regardless of whether or not that wedding is state sanctioned.

Still waiting for the answer as to how you're so completely ignorant about basic facts despite spending countless hours arguing about them. My guess is probably a combination of stupidity and mental illness.

And no one is discriminating against gay people having a wedding.

They are discriminating against 2 people of the same-sex having a wedding.

Marriage is just a contract. How you can possibly be ignorant of this fact despite using this exact argument in favor of SSM is beyond me.