A *technical* possibility for the new opening in the S.C.

[Jhhnn]

Not a good idea, and Junior wouldn't like it, anyway. He'd have to read.

 

[cKGunslinger]

Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21

And cK, are you saying that Bush is a piss-poor person? Because it seems like you're just capping on the Democrats for not being able to best Bush..

I'm simply saying that Bush is certainly not a *good* President, or at least, hasn't shown himself to be such in the last 5 years or so.

But yes, I am also railing on the majority of Dems who considered him to be not just "not good," but rather, stupid, idiotic, incompetent, illiterate, simian, evil, war-mongering, terrorist-creating, draft-dodging, duty-shirking, and generally unelectable, yet still somehow managed to put up and support an inferior candidate.

 

[Tommunist]

Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Loki, where does it say that, though? I don't think it says it anywhere. I cited an example earlier where John Marshall was both Secretary of State and Chief Justice. (Link).

And cK, are you saying that Bush is a piss-poor person? Because it seems like you're just capping on the Democrats for not being able to best Bush..

i hope the rules have changed since then - if the three areas of gov't could be composed of by all the same people that would kind of hurt our checks and balances...

 

[Sheik Yerbouti]

I wonder what cute little nicknames he'd muster up for the rest of the justices...

 

[tweakmm]

Originally posted by: cKGunslinger

Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider

Originally posted by: Harvey
Bush is an inarticulate, functionally illiterate buffoon. Nobody's would approve him for the job.

We did. Twice.

Exactly. And just because you didn't vote for him does not somehow magically exonerate you from blame for his position of power. If anything, Kerry voters are probably *more* to blame, as they felt Bush wasn't the right man for the job, yet didn't care enough to even put up a semi-decent candidate that could garner support.

"Oh, a turd could beat GWB."

And that's exactly what the Dems put up against him - a turd. And while it was an admittedly close race, in the end, it still couldn't top the colossal mediocrity that is Bush. Nice job!

No, they put a giant douche against a turd sandwitch and the American people chose the turd sandwitch.

"No, you're a turd sandwitch."

 

[nageov3t]

Originally posted by: Tommunist

Originally posted by: 2Xtreme21
Loki, where does it say that, though? I don't think it says it anywhere. I cited an example earlier where John Marshall was both Secretary of State and Chief Justice. (Link).

And cK, are you saying that Bush is a piss-poor person? Because it seems like you're just capping on the Democrats for not being able to best Bush..

i hope the rules have changed since then - if the three areas of gov't could be composed of by all the same people that would kind of hurt our checks and balances...

it's in the constitution with regards to the Legislative and Executive branches. I had just assumed it also applied to the Judicial.