• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A stupid question about the Pythagorean Theorem

Chaotic42

Chaotic42

Lifer
Why is it a theorem? What aren't the proofs enough to make it a law?

Edit: Feel free to mock me for not knowing what the word theorem meant. :beer:
 
dunno, i forgot all about him. ;] Math is not my subject.. neither is english. Of course someone smart was going to add in something about english!
 
Originally posted by: Twista
dunno, i forgot all about him. ;] Math is not my subject.. neither is english. Of course someone smart was going to add in something about english!
Click to expand...

that is the longest nef i have ever seen
 
Originally posted by: Pepsi90919
Originally posted by: Twista
dunno, i forgot all about him. ;] Math is not my subject.. neither is english. Of course someone smart was going to add in something about english!
Click to expand...

that is the longest nef i have ever seen
Click to expand...

amen
 
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Why is it a theorem? What aren't the proofs enough to make it a law?
Click to expand...

😕

What are you talking about? The proofs make it a theorem, thats what we call things we proove.
 
A theorem is a statement of how something is. A proof demonstrates why a theorem (ie a statement) is valid. There are many proofs of the pythagorean theorem, those are proofs, where as the final statement that is proved is the pythagorean theorem
 
Originally posted by: Chronoshock
A theorem is a statement of how something is. A proof demonstrates why a theorem (ie a statement) is valid. There are many proofs of the pythagorean theorem, those are proofs, where as the final statement that is proved is the pythagorean theorem
Click to expand...

So what differentiates a theorem like this from a law like the "law of cosines"?
 
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: Chronoshock
A theorem is a statement of how something is. A proof demonstrates why a theorem (ie a statement) is valid. There are many proofs of the pythagorean theorem, those are proofs, where as the final statement that is proved is the pythagorean theorem
Click to expand...

So what differentiates a theorem like this from a law like the "law of cosines"?
Click to expand...

Well here's a better answer than I could give
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Law.html
Look around the site for a great resource for any math definitions you could ever want
 
Originally posted by: Chronoshock
Well here's a better answer than I could give
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Law.html
Look around the site for a great resource for any math definitions you could ever want
Click to expand...

Theorem: A statement which can be demonstrated to be true by accepted mathematical operations and arguments

Law: A law is a mathematical statement which always holds true. Whereas "laws" in physics are generally experimental observations backed up by theoretical underpinning, laws in mathematics are generally theorems which can formally be proven true under the stated conditions.

Those seem to be duplicate definitions, unless it's just late. Can they be used interchangeably?


 
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
Originally posted by: Chronoshock
Well here's a better answer than I could give
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Law.html
Look around the site for a great resource for any math definitions you could ever want
Click to expand...

Theorem: A statement which can be demonstrated to be true by accepted mathematical operations and arguments

Law: A law is a mathematical statement which always holds true. Whereas "laws" in physics are generally experimental observations backed up by theoretical underpinning, laws in mathematics are generally theorems which can formally be proven true under the stated conditions.

Those seem to be duplicate definitions, unless it's just late. Can they be used interchangeably?
Click to expand...

They are not the same.
 
My interpretation is that a law is something that our entire concept of mathematics is based on. 2+2=4 or nothing else works. A theorem is just a relation between two things.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top