• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A serious look at Health Care in other countries

stateofbeasley

Senior member
NPR - T.R. Reid: Looking Overseas For 'Healing Of America'

Journalist and author T.R. Reid set out on a global tour of hospitals and doctors' offices, all in the hopes of understanding how other industrialized nations provide affordable, effective universal health care. The result: his book The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care.

Reid is a foreign correspondent for The Washington Post ? in whose pages he recently addressed five major myths about other countries' health-care systems ? and the former chief of the paper's London and Tokyo bureaus.

I don't think Americans really understand how health care works in other countries. A common thing I hear from people who are not really tuned in to the current debate is "I don't want us to be socialist like France", which is actually a false characterization of the French system.

In a nutshell:

There are two basic questions: Who administers payment for health care, and who delivers the actual care itself.

In the UK, the British Government administers insurance and delivery of health care through the NHS. Basically all of health care is run by the government. This is probably most accurately described by the 'socialist' label thrown around.

In France, Germany, many other European countries, and Japan, insurance companies are almost all private AND non-profit. The laws there make insurance non-profit in order to eliminate the conflict of interest that arises when an insurance company has to chose between paying for a patient's care and making profits for shareholders. The insurance companies must accept everyone regardless of prior conditions.

Interestingly, insurance companies use the health coverage under this system as a carrot to get people to sign up for kinds of insurance they provide for profit, like auto and home insurance. They hope that if their health plan attracts people, they can also get those people to buy policies for other things.

Canada is a hybrid system. Government administers insurance, and private parties run the doctor's offices and hospitals.

In many poor nations, people pay cash for their own care. There's no insurance and no government involvement.

The US system is a mess that runs all these types of insurance systems in parallel. People in the VA system and Indian Tribe System are in an NHS-like program. Medicare is essentially the Canadian system. Employer based healthcare is like France, at least while you are employed.

The vast magnitude of systems, payment agreements, and paperwork causes administrative overhead in the US to skyrocket.

T.R. Reid also discusses the pros and cons of each type of system. It's well worth listening to.
 
It's perfectly fair to look at how other nations provide health care, with the caveat that we aren't considering anything like what happens in other countries. Here in the US, party politics is king, with everything else taking a distant second.
 
Originally posted by: Hayabusa Rider
It's perfectly fair to look at how other nations provide health care, with the caveat that we aren't considering anything like what happens in other countries. Here in the US, party politics is king, with everything else taking a distant second.

I thought the example of Taiwan was pretty funny. Once Taiwan became a wealthy nation, people started demanding a modern health care system. The conservatives in power decided to implement a Canadian-style system so the liberals wouldn't be able to take credit, lol.

One thing I wonder is if the American public generally suffers from "not made here" syndrome. When I hear people shouting "I don't want us to be like EUROPE!one!11" I get annoyed. I suspect that a lot of people believe anything American is the best... simply because it is American, and don't even pause to consider that we can learn something from other countries.
 
85% are covered, it is not a mess. I am without insurance. And I am against any government involvement WHATSOEVER. MMmmk got that?

There will be no investment in new medical care if we socialize it. Which is what will happen, Obama will subsidize the gov't program so that nobody can compete, they'll all die off, and then everybody will be on the gov't program. And then all the funds will go to curing issues, and absolutely none will be spent on curing new diseases or on new research. You can kiss your hopes of a cancer cure being implemented goodbye.
 
It is when you get into an accident. Oh no wait, then you'll go to the ER and those of us with insurance will have to foot your bill. Gee, thanks!

Looks like you are already covered under socialized healthcare with my inflated premium payments. No wonder you're okay with it.
 
His description of the french/swiss systems sounded interesting. Could it be as easy as forcing insurance companies to be non-profit entities?
 
Originally posted by: ohnoes
His description of the french/swiss systems sounded interesting. Could it be as easy as forcing insurance companies to be non-profit entities?

I like it too but I think it would be a tough sell in this country. OTOH, it might be attainable slowly over years if we start out with co-ops that the dems despise.

Lots of ways to slice and dice this. I just wish these kinds of discussions were going on in our congress before the recess rather than "here's our 1,000 page bill with tons of ambiguity to confuse both sides"
 
First few minutes "when Americans get government run health care they really seem to like it, the VA, the Native American Health server, and Medicare are the three most popular health care systems all run by government"

I'll keep listening...
 
Originally posted by: ohnoes
His description of the french/swiss systems sounded interesting. Could it be as easy as forcing insurance companies to be non-profit entities?

Hahahahahahahaha

Profits are always above the people in the US, come on.
 
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
85% are covered, it is not a mess. I am without insurance. And I am against any government involvement WHATSOEVER. MMmmk got that?

You are a Shmoo.

Shmoos are delicious to eat, and are eager to be eaten. If a human looks at one hungrily, it will happily immolate itself, either by jumping into a frying pan, after which they taste like chicken, or into a broiling pan, after which they taste like steak. When roasted they taste like pork, and when baked they taste like catfish. (Raw, they taste like oysters on the half-shell.)

Shmoos are eager to serve their wealthy health insurance masters. If a CEO or insurance claims agent looks at one greedily, the shmoo will happily immolate itself on an alter of capitalism, either by opening up its wallet or by pressuring the government to continue to force people into being shmoos.

(This is what a Shmoo looks like, btw.) (IMHO, it could also be a parody for male genitalia.)
 
Originally posted by: WhipperSnapper
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
85% are covered, it is not a mess. I am without insurance. And I am against any government involvement WHATSOEVER. MMmmk got that?

You are a Shmoo.

Shmoos are delicious to eat, and are eager to be eaten. If a human looks at one hungrily, it will happily immolate itself, either by jumping into a frying pan, after which they taste like chicken, or into a broiling pan, after which they taste like steak. When roasted they taste like pork, and when baked they taste like catfish. (Raw, they taste like oysters on the half-shell.)

Shmoos are eager to serve wealthy masters. If a CEO looks at one greedily, the shmoo will happily immolate itself on an alter of capitalism, either by opening up its wallet or by pressuring the government to continue to force people into being shmoos.

(This is what a Shmoo looks like, btw.) (IMHO, it could also be a parody for male genitalia.)

I don't get it.
 
Originally posted by: Atreus21I don't get it.

It should have been pretty obvious, but perhaps it went over your head. A Shmoo is a moronic creature that happily sacrifices its interests for the benefit of others, such as the morons who are happy to pay 17% of the nation's GDP while leaving tens of millions of Americans uninsured or under-insured with the rest of the populace living in terror all so that health insurance, pharmaceutical, and hospital owners and executives can be wealthy. Consequently, people in other nations around the world think Americans are retarded.
 
Originally posted by: soccerballtux
85% are covered, it is not a mess. I am without insurance. And I am against any government involvement WHATSOEVER. MMmmk got that?

There will be no investment in new medical care if we socialize it. Which is what will happen, Obama will subsidize the gov't program so that nobody can compete, they'll all die off, and then everybody will be on the gov't program. And then all the funds will go to curing issues, and absolutely none will be spent on curing new diseases or on new research. You can kiss your hopes of a cancer cure being implemented goodbye.

damn, you've persuaded me. i'm not sure if it was the patently false info you provided, your paranoid slippery slope argument, or your unfounded conspiracy theories, but you've totally won me over.

(listen to the podcast and learn something)
 
Back
Top