• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A school bus just sideswiped my car

ThePresence

Elite Member
It was parked. Unfortunately I was parked facing the wrong direction. 🙁

Thankfully the damage was not too bad.

Funny thing is I'm in middle of negotiating on a price for a new car. Moving from 2000 Maxima SE to an Acura TL.
 
will it buff out?

can you record the moment you tell the person you are negotiating with?
"Funny thing sir, about the car you wanted to buy...."
 
Originally posted by: oogabooga
will it buff out?

can you record the moment you tell the person you are negotiating with?
"Funny thing sir, about the car you wanted to buy...."

LOL. I did not put my car up for sale yet. I'm negotiating on the price of a new car, not MY car.
 
Originally posted by: ThePresence
It was parked. Unfortunately I was parked facing the wrong direction. 🙁

Thankfully the damage was not too bad.

Funny thing is I'm in middle of negotiating on a price for a new car. Moving from 2000 Maxima SE to an Acura TL.
Did that get you a ticket?
 
Originally posted by: skyking
Originally posted by: ThePresence
It was parked. Unfortunately I was parked facing the wrong direction. 🙁

Thankfully the damage was not too bad.

Funny thing is I'm in middle of negotiating on a price for a new car. Moving from 2000 Maxima SE to an Acura TL.
Did that get you a ticket?

No. The officer said that since there was no damage to the bus that she would let it slide.
 
Originally posted by: OdiN
How does facing the wrong direction make it okay for a bus driver to sideswipe your car?

It certainly doesn't. But it might make it difficult for me to collect from insurance.
 
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: OdiN
How does facing the wrong direction make it okay for a bus driver to sideswipe your car?

It certainly doesn't. But it might make it difficult for me to collect from insurance.

I don't see why. Your car isn't suddenly wider because it's facing a different direction. That's kinda crappy.
 
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: OdiN
How does facing the wrong direction make it okay for a bus driver to sideswipe your car?

It certainly doesn't. But it might make it difficult for me to collect from insurance.

I don't see why. Your car isn't suddenly wider because it's facing a different direction. That's kinda crappy.

I see you haven't dealt with an insurance company before... 😉
 
Originally posted by: zinfamous
Originally posted by: OdiN
Originally posted by: ThePresence
Originally posted by: OdiN
How does facing the wrong direction make it okay for a bus driver to sideswipe your car?

It certainly doesn't. But it might make it difficult for me to collect from insurance.

I don't see why. Your car isn't suddenly wider because it's facing a different direction. That's kinda crappy.

I see you haven't dealt with an insurance company before... 😉

Oh I have, but I'm just saying it's stupid.
 
yeah its retarded. i've seen cops write people tickets for parking the wrong direction on very low volume residential roads.
 
(not legal advice))
I"m pretty sure you can fight this.

sure you were facing the wrong way, but you were not moving. the bus driver clearly saw your vehicle.

even if they are not 100% at fault, they should hold majority liability.

I would try to claim.

the fact is the fact. bus driver hit a parked vehicle.

you parked on the wrong way of the road did not cuase this accident.

 
Originally posted by: Semidevil
(not legal advice))
I"m pretty sure you can fight this.

sure you were facing the wrong way, but you were not moving. the bus driver clearly saw your vehicle.

even if they are not 100% at fault, they should hold majority liability.

I would try to claim.

the fact is the fact. bus driver hit a parked vehicle.

you parked on the wrong way of the road did not cuase this accident.
hitting a parked car here is a serious offense. Doesn't matter who it was, there is no exception to this law.
 
Originally posted by: Semidevil

even if they are not 100% at fault, they should hold majority liability.

AFAIK, there is no such thing as "majority" or percentages of liability that aren't 100% or 0%... the only other option is that the insurance companies don't see fit to sue the hell out of each other and just each takes care of their own client in situation where fault cannot be accurately determined.
 
Originally posted by: Hyperlite
yeah its retarded. i've seen cops write people tickets for parking the wrong direction on very low volume residential roads.

Where there should be plenty of spots on the correct side of the road for them to park on?

I really, really hate it when people park in the wrong direction.
 
Ok, here's the deal- I used to work auto insurance liability claims. I did some research on NJ law, and this is what I came up with: NJ IS a 'not as great as' state. This means that the only bar to recovering for property damage is that you cannot recover from someone who's negligence is 'not as great as' yours. In a two-car accident, you can recover from the other driver so long as you were not 51% at fault or more.

In the situation you described, you would normally be 0% at fault. The fact that your car was parked facing the wrong way (presumably on the wrong side of the street) does not alter the fact that the other driver hit a stationary object. You may be criminally liable to the city/county for a parking violation, but that has no bearing on the fact that the bus driver (and their employer) is civilly liable for the property damaged.

Now, the other driver's personal insurance will not cover them, since they drive for a living and that is a common exclusion. Since the bus driver was acting in the course of employment when the accident happened, the school/district is liable as an employer. Getting the school/district to pay will be tough.

Do you have collision coverage on your car? If so, suck it up, eat the deductible, and make a claim on your collision coverage. By using your insurance, you've got them and their adjustors and attorneys on your side now. Your insurance will be legally required to fix your vehicle, covering all expenses minus the deductible. When you make the claim, be sure to tell them exactly what happened and that you believe the other driver is at fault. They will conduct an investigation and should agree. At that point, they will have paid $$$ to fix your car, money they should not have paid. They will contact the other insurance and attempt to recover their money (and your deductible). If they can't reach an amicable agreement, they will go to arbitration for you. All of this is done at their expense. Trust me, they will have much better luck at pushing around a public agency than you will. If you need a rental, either use the rental coverage on your policy or pay out of pocket. If you pay out of pocket, keep the receipts for reimbursement.

The other option if you choose (or do not have collision coverage) is to go direct to the employer. Trust me, it will be a headache. If you have to, always remember that:
1- you are not at fault
2- you have no monetary responsibility for any of the repairs (except betterment, which is when you get a new part to replace one that was damaged BEFORE the accident)
3- you will not go away

 
In reference to the "Getting the school/district to pay will be tough."

Last November I was parallel parking in Brooklyn, NY. God damn Access-a-ride bus came tearing by and broke off a chunk of my driver's side mirror and smashed the mirror itself. Long and the short of it is that NYC refused to pony up the bill because the private contracting company who damaged my car said they weren't in the area at the time.
 
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Semidevil

even if they are not 100% at fault, they should hold majority liability.

AFAIK, there is no such thing as "majority" or percentages of liability that aren't 100% or 0%... the only other option is that the insurance companies don't see fit to sue the hell out of each other and just each takes care of their own client in situation where fault cannot be accurately determined.

not true. I was stopped in a parking lot, waiting to make a right turn into a spot. some girl backed into me. they held me 20% liable because i didn't honk fast enough. i shit you not.
 
Originally posted by: Sentinel
In reference to the "Getting the school/district to pay will be tough."

Last November I was parallel parking in Brooklyn, NY. God damn Access-a-ride bus came tearing by and broke off a chunk of my driver's side mirror and smashed the mirror itself. Long and the short of it is that NYC refused to pony up the bill because the private contracting company who damaged my car said they weren't in the area at the time.
Didn't you get bus drivers info?😕
 
Originally posted by: sactoking
Ok, here's the deal- I used to work auto insurance liability claims. I did some research on NJ law, and this is what I came up with: NJ IS a 'not as great as' state. This means that the only bar to recovering for property damage is that you cannot recover from someone who's negligence is 'not as great as' yours. In a two-car accident, you can recover from the other driver so long as you were not 51% at fault or more.

In the situation you described, you would normally be 0% at fault. The fact that your car was parked facing the wrong way (presumably on the wrong side of the street) does not alter the fact that the other driver hit a stationary object. You may be criminally liable to the city/county for a parking violation, but that has no bearing on the fact that the bus driver (and their employer) is civilly liable for the property damaged.

Now, the other driver's personal insurance will not cover them, since they drive for a living and that is a common exclusion. Since the bus driver was acting in the course of employment when the accident happened, the school/district is liable as an employer. Getting the school/district to pay will be tough.

Do you have collision coverage on your car? If so, suck it up, eat the deductible, and make a claim on your collision coverage. By using your insurance, you've got them and their adjustors and attorneys on your side now. Your insurance will be legally required to fix your vehicle, covering all expenses minus the deductible. When you make the claim, be sure to tell them exactly what happened and that you believe the other driver is at fault. They will conduct an investigation and should agree. At that point, they will have paid $$$ to fix your car, money they should not have paid. They will contact the other insurance and attempt to recover their money (and your deductible). If they can't reach an amicable agreement, they will go to arbitration for you. All of this is done at their expense. Trust me, they will have much better luck at pushing around a public agency than you will. If you need a rental, either use the rental coverage on your policy or pay out of pocket. If you pay out of pocket, keep the receipts for reimbursement.

The other option if you choose (or do not have collision coverage) is to go direct to the employer. Trust me, it will be a headache. If you have to, always remember that:
1- you are not at fault
2- you have no monetary responsibility for any of the repairs (except betterment, which is when you get a new part to replace one that was damaged BEFORE the accident)
3- you will not go away
Wow, that's useful info.
I have collision, but it really wasn't damaged that badly. I got some nice size scrapes along the side of the car and on the drivers side mirror, and a broken side light near the read bumper. It also scraped up the alloy wheel pretty bad. That's all I was able to see. There is no driveability issue at all.
 
Originally posted by: Ns1
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: Semidevil

even if they are not 100% at fault, they should hold majority liability.

AFAIK, there is no such thing as "majority" or percentages of liability that aren't 100% or 0%... the only other option is that the insurance companies don't see fit to sue the hell out of each other and just each takes care of their own client in situation where fault cannot be accurately determined.

not true. I was stopped in a parking lot, waiting to make a right turn into a spot. some girl backed into me. they held me 20% liable because i didn't honk fast enough. i shit you not.

😕 That's so f'ing ridiculous it hurts my brain. Insurance companies are such a crock of crap. Maybe it varies by state.
 
Back
Top