• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A Scanner Darkly

I have been thinking about checking it out. I must say: I find it ironic that Robert Downey Jr. is playing a starring role. 😀 Not that he knows anything about illegal drugs, their usage, how and where to buy them and the associated criminal penalites for being stupid enough to get caught...multiple times. :laugh:
 
The book is wonderful. Another paranoia fable written by a man who is now believed to be insane at the time he wrote it.
 
Originally posted by: MaxDepth
The book is wonderful. Another paranoia fable written by a man who is now believed to be insane at the time he wrote it.
Click to expand...

Well insane people do tend to make the most interesting stuff.
 
We just picked up some tickets to it tomorrow night, compliments of a free Fandango offer in the Hot Forums.

That deal was only good for a "R" rated movie by the 21st of July. Hard to come by those around here so it was either "A Scanner Darkly" or not use the two free tickets. The movie has some big name actors in it but I'm leary based on the premise I read. But hey, free is good and it gives me a chance to unwide for a couple hours if nothing else. 🙂

The movie definitely sounds wierd though...
 
I thought it was one of the best films of the year, along with Cache and Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada.

An above poster got it wrong. It does not blame society for individuals using drugs. It blames society for being complicit in keeping people addicted once they get addicted and for hollow attempts at enforcement.

The dialogue was really entertaining. Lots of laughs. The animation was not out of place for a film with these subjects. The acting was top notch. Robert Downey Jr in particular. This is the perfect blend of Waking Life, Dazed and Confused, and the original Philip K Dick novel.
 
Originally posted by: torpid
I thought it was one of the best films of the year, along with Cache and Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada.

An above poster got it wrong. It does not blame society for individuals using drugs. It blames society for being complicit in keeping people addicted once they get addicted and for hollow attempts at enforcement.

The dialogue was really entertaining. Lots of laughs. The animation was not out of place for a film with these subjects. The acting was top notch. Robert Downey Jr in particular. This is the perfect blend of Waking Life, Dazed and Confused, and the original Philip K Dick novel.
Click to expand...

:thumbsup: Thanks for a detailed review. Will look into seeing it.
 
I just saw it this weekend and would agree with Torpid. This was a great movie. The acting was perfect from everyone. THe plot, while predictable, was not the focus. The interactions and emotional/mental deterioration was the key. Beautiful and potent.
 
Originally posted by: JS80
Worst movie ever. The movie basically blames individuals' choice to use drugs on society/government.
Click to expand...

worst movie ever?

hmm maybe you can enlighten us on things like the script, the acting, the cinematagraphy, the visual style, etc.. Things that you base a movie review on.
 
I saw it over the weekend and thought it looked amazing and was well played roles by those that did it though I think they went a little over the top with the whole the government is big and evil theme IMO but that's Phillip K. Dick's style I suppose, just that his previous version of books-to-movie were less extreme on that front and more of a well rounded plot/story.

But if for nothing that to admire the way it looks on the big screen then I'd say it's not a total waste to see.


Just my $00.02.

 
Originally posted by: JS80
Worst movie ever. The movie basically blames individuals' choice to use drugs on society/government.
Click to expand...
wow, the critique of a genius


In contrast: Here's a worthwhile, and imho accurate, review.


http://filmfreakcentral.net/screenreviews/scannerdarkly.htm

Our reality has almost outstripped Philip K. Dick's paranoid fantasies, and Richard Linklater's grim A Scanner Darkly is the slipperiest take yet on the war between perception vs. reality in a year that knows United 93. Keanu Reeves, so often woefully miscast, is wonderfully imagined here as a guy in a "scramble suit": his appearance constantly shifting in a kaleidoscope of mismatched parts--the uniform of future-narcs (seven years from now, announce the opening title) sent undercover to ferret out the dopers and dealers of Substance D. It's a hallucinogen that eventually causes a rift in the individual consciousness (the left hemisphere atrophies and the right tries to compensate) and Reeves' Agent Fred is sent to find out where dealer Donna (Winona Ryder) is getting her ******. But the scramble suits seem mainly used to keep the vice squad's identities from one another instead of their quarry, meaning that Fred goes underground as himself, Robert Arctor, in full grunge, inhabiting his once-cozy suburban nook with tweaked conspiracy theorists Ernie (Woody Harrelson) and Barris (Robert Downey Jr.). Meaning, too, that Fred is asked to spy on Arctor, and that Barris, in a pair of hilarious scenes, informs on Arctor to Arctor. It's not the labyrinthine audacity of Dick's delusions that so enthrals, but rather the mendacity of them. What's complicated about A Scanner Darkly isn't the compression of identity or the various plots to which its characters imagine themselves hero and victim, but the idea that reality conforms itself to belief--that because life has stopped making sense to you, life has stopped making sense, period.

Animated frame-by-frame using the same rotoscoping process Linklater employed in Waking Life, A Scanner Darkly resembles nothing so much as a three-dimensional image frozen and sliced into different, shifting planes. Every second is in motion--sort of a wiggle--that causes faces to slide against themselves and gnash while the characters are talking. It's a mesmerizing technique that has the effect of furthering the film's theme of disconnection. Oppositional ideas in conflict with one another is, after all, the foundation upon which A Scanner Darkly and its perception-splitting drug is built. A moment where Arctor looks at his lover post-coitus to see her transformed, replicated later as Agent Fred replays the same moment of discovery (sometimes from angles which we know aren't subject to hidden cameras (a.k.a. the scanners of the film's title)), describes the intimacy of his reality's violation. Because we're watching a live-action feature that's been animated and then watching our protagonist watching a video that he's secretly taken of himself, the seed of a sneaking suspicion begins to creep in that the drug-induced madness of Fred/Arctor that allows him to separate what he knows from what he sees is of the very same madness the film induces in the audience. I know that this is Keanu Reeves and a cast of indie luminaries in a film directed by Richard Linklater--and then I know that it's an animated adaptation of an engagingly impenetrable book by Philip K. Dick. And still I'm at times incapable of distinguishing its contortions from the truths littering my own philosophy. What does it mean to take art to heart?

Illegal, aggressive surveillance threatens to open A Scanner Darkly to an interpretation as an attack on our beloved domestic policy of dirty tricks, but look beyond that to a more wide-reaching indictment of the way we accept information and are fed paranoia, encouraged to trust the diseased skylarks of our drugged minds. If we can imagine it for you, it's true (echoes of Dick's short story, "We Can Remember It For You, Wholesale", which became Total Recall), thus this mass media televisual dystopia of ours becomes the angry fix for our atrophied left hemispheres. Day-by-day, we're less capable of reason and more accepting of garbage like Pirates of the Caribbean: Dead Man's Chest as entertainment; the appetite for something bigger, louder, and more three-dimensional in our experiential tourism has become insatiable. The lingering indications of our addiction to facility is this inability to connect with one another (Donna rejects physical contact: "I have to be careful because I do so much coke"), to engage in the essential human survival pastimes of ****** and communicating danger--until at the end what's left on the table are suspicion, loneliness, and misdirected rage at anything with the temerity to be difficult to understand. A Scanner Darkly is, like the best science-fiction, about you plus me and the time ticking away on the remainder. It says something that I found the film to be almost Pollyannaish when all's said and done: Linklater and Dick seem to hope that a spark of awareness awaits us on the other side of our self-induced doping. But maybe I see too many movies.-Walter Chaw
Click to expand...


 
The presentation (artwork?) looks pretty impressive. I may just go to watch it because it looks so damn cool.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top