Originally posted by: Doboji
You make a very broad assumption about religion. That is, you obviously belive that free thinking and religion are mutually exclusive. This is not the case. People can choose to blindly believe everything their rabbi, priest, or imam tells them, or they can study the religion and come to their own conclusions.
Much of religion doesnt even relate to god. Sometimes it's the cultural values that people hold onto, a sense of community. And for some like myself really do believe in god. This doesnt mean that somehow I am now incapable of thinking for myself. It doesnt mean that I've been brainwashed into believing whatever my parents taught me. My mother does not believe in god.
Your blanket assumption that we should eliminate religion in order to free the human mind is a really naive assumption. It is human nature itself that shackles the human mind. Abolishing religion is first of all impossible, and secondly, even if you did, other beliefs and traditions, and ideas would emerge to replace religion with all the same evils.
I understand the basis of your argument... but you really need to take the time and think about this a little more. I think you'll find that Religion is only an excuse for evil, it is not the source.
-Max
Free thinking and religion
are exclusive. It annoys me when people live by only certain aspects of the bible. If you pick and choose which sections to live by, you're clearly just making it up for yourself. Either live wholly by the bible/holy book (follow the religion) or reject it and be a free thinker. You might as well pick any book with quotes you like and live by that: it's no more a religion.
cultural values, tradition, respect, standards of good living should all be taught by parents. I'd prefer to assume people in this day and age have the intelligence to know what is a decent way to live: what is proper, what is wrong. there is no need for ancient texts.
Originally posted by: Unheard
Hmm your argument works both ways..... It would seem that science is nothing more than a religion in and of its self that believes in a deity called itself. After all, science will fix all problems, wont it? Science is everywhere. Science knows everything (or eventually will). I'm not shoving Christianity down your throat, quit shoving your ideology down mine.
Well, swapping the words over doen't make it 'work'. Science doesn't push moral values and is neutral whereas religions are not. Many are, in fact, quite gresome and certainly archaic.
Science does not assume anything, or force thoughts. it's a process that anyone can contribute to (note: updating, renual and evolution of thoughts/ideas is a good thing) and can be disputed by whomever has sufficient evidence to negate whatever they wish to. Is does not tell you how to live your life, nor does it form the basis of hate. Because of this i feel your comment is inherently flawed.
Originally posted by: Abel007
Why should parents be witheld from teaching their beliefs/non-beliefs to their children? Because you think its a good idea? Remember when we, as kids, got spankings and disciplined for our actions? Whats going on now? A child gets spanked in public for whatever reason and the police are called and the parent warned or the child is taken away. This is just a small example of what happens when people assume the law needs to be changed for the greater good of the children. Beliefs being passed on do not need to be affected by a law or anything else.
the example you provide is a perfect example of a human using their brain to judge a situation and figure the optimal way through it. A religion (I'm going to broadly base this on christianity since this will be the majority religion int hese forums) is a set of cruel, old fashioned beliefs from aeons ago. I support humans thiking for themselves, but reject living by ancient books.
Originally posted by: SampSon
So basically you are so vain that you believe there is nothing out there that is infinitely beyond human comprehension? Humans are such a profound construct of random occurances that we can inevitably understand all there is to be known in the universe, even how the thing was created? You have quite a bit of blind faith in human science.
We don't know sh!t from shineola yet, not even close. Yet with this limited amount of information we have collected and processed through our human only perspective, we are able to dismiss any possibility of the universe being much deeper than our human created sciences. That is one egotistical, pig-headed, short-sighted and just straight up ignorant way of going about things. You as a human are incapable of full understanding of the universe, yet you convince yourself in complete blind faith that someday, somehow you will know all the secrets of this incredibly vast reality you are in.
You don't have to believe in "god' or a structured religion, but you absolutely have to keep your mind open enough to consider the endless possibilities. Though me expecting you to keep an open mind is also an incredible leap of blind faith, or a fairytale of sort.
I liked this comment.
I agree with it too. We don't know everythign , essentially quite little, but because we don't know it all, it's no reason to assume there is some deity out there. In my post, please nnote that I nowhere assumed that we would undertsand it all, but because we don't, it doesn't mean someone else does.
I'd rather people spent their time working on learning more rather than wasting time blindly following religions. Imagine what we could have achieved if all the time humans had spent praying/building holy buildings/fighting over religion was instead spent on science and improving our own knowledge.
This thread has been interesting.