- Feb 2, 2005
- 17,252
- 19
- 81
So I own a retail store. One of the things we sell is Red Wing work boots. It's a very small store in the grand scheme of things, and I do basically everything that gets done in it.
A customer brings a pair of Red Wing boots back 3 days shy of the 6 month waterproof warranty and demands a new pair of boots because his are leaking. I can clearly see that there is a hole worn in the toe of both boots, and I know that red wing does not extend their waterproof warranty to boots that have holes worn in them.
The little warranty card from the boot box that the customer presents to me also says this, which I point out to them. Just to be on the safe side, I phone Red Wing's warranty department while the customer is still there and tell them that I have a customer with a pair of boots with holes worn into the toes that seems to be the result of regular wear, but holes nonetheless. Red Wing tells me that this does indeed void the warranty. I relay this to the customer, who gets very pissy and vows never to shop with me again.
My question is... Am I unreasonable for not giving a flying fuck about this? We can eat the shipping charge for sending an item back for warranty reasons, but we certainly can't extend a warranty that the manufacturers themselves won't extend. The manufacturers warranty is our warranty. We are a cut above the bigger stores in the warranty department simply because we honor the full manufacturers warranty from our store no matter how extensive it is. I feel justified, but also perturbed by the prospect of losing a customer. What say ye ATOT?
A customer brings a pair of Red Wing boots back 3 days shy of the 6 month waterproof warranty and demands a new pair of boots because his are leaking. I can clearly see that there is a hole worn in the toe of both boots, and I know that red wing does not extend their waterproof warranty to boots that have holes worn in them.
The little warranty card from the boot box that the customer presents to me also says this, which I point out to them. Just to be on the safe side, I phone Red Wing's warranty department while the customer is still there and tell them that I have a customer with a pair of boots with holes worn into the toes that seems to be the result of regular wear, but holes nonetheless. Red Wing tells me that this does indeed void the warranty. I relay this to the customer, who gets very pissy and vows never to shop with me again.
My question is... Am I unreasonable for not giving a flying fuck about this? We can eat the shipping charge for sending an item back for warranty reasons, but we certainly can't extend a warranty that the manufacturers themselves won't extend. The manufacturers warranty is our warranty. We are a cut above the bigger stores in the warranty department simply because we honor the full manufacturers warranty from our store no matter how extensive it is. I feel justified, but also perturbed by the prospect of losing a customer. What say ye ATOT?