*Requires a premium Yahoo! account, so a paid subscription is needed ?
Originally posted by: blazer
*Requires a premium Yahoo! account, so a paid subscription is needed ?
LoL! I *guess* that's a question... 😀
If it was... no, it doesn't require anything. I just use it as a normal mail client.
I suppose I could use it on Yahoo, but Yahoo requires a subscription if you wanna use POP, and I h-a-t-e POP! Therefore, yes, Yahoo requires a subscription, but WLM doesn't.
Actually, I use IMAP exclusively, which is irregular, so...
I use Windows Live Mail as an irregular mail client, not a normal mail client.
Hrm...
Anyway, that's how I measure how well a mail client works! If it handles IMAP nicely, then I know it's a champ - and WLM is a champ! :thumbsup:
LoL! Is that confusing enough?!?!?
Originally posted by: blazer
The problem is that some free mail servers don't offer POP3 or IMAP protocols. If you use a POP3 mail client, the email provider can't fill your mail reader full of advertisements, like they can with a webmail client.*Requires a premium Yahoo! account, so a paid subscription is needed ?
Why Yahoo, MSN, and AOL ignore progress.
"It's known that most free email services exist on profits from advertising that is shown to users in the email account web interface. That's why the Internet web giants of web industry are not in a hurry to give a free access to mailboxes through the POP3 and SMTP protocols. No doubt they wouldn't want the effectiveness of their advertising to be reduced greatly. Such giants as Yahoo.com, MSN.com, and AOL.com have many users who are attached to other services of the companies and they are being slow to provide users with such access, just because people got used to use the web interface."
Originally posted by: Griffinhart
I definitely suggest giving live mail a try as well. It reminds me of outlook in that it handles mail, calendar, contacts, feeds and newsgroups.
Originally posted by: blazer
using WLM would keep all your mail and mail folders offsite correct.