• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A pole to end it all: Foobar vs. Winamp

Originally posted by: toekramp
k, foobar sucks, the interface sucks, everything about it sucks


just load up winamp and go

Maybe if you listen to music with $15 computer speakers and onboard sound. :roll:
 
always used winamp.. since the 1.x days. many years. used quintessential for a while, actually still do sometimes, but winamp is so simple and reliable (not winamp 3) 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Iron Woode
Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Sea pole
WTF is a sea pole?

Whale organ?

Anyway, foobar2k easily. Used winamp for years, but recently switched. It's no one thing (although the masstagger is sweet, edit tags without even opening k-mp3 or tagscanner 🙂), but more that it does a lot of little things better, and isn't bloaty or slow to load.
 
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: toekramp
k, foobar sucks, the interface sucks, everything about it sucks
Except for the wicked sound quality.

The sound quality for various MP3 programs varies?? Wouldn't the sound qaulity rely on the actual sound file, and the hardware used?

 
Originally posted by: Insane3D
Originally posted by: tweakmm
Originally posted by: toekramp
k, foobar sucks, the interface sucks, everything about it sucks
Except for the wicked sound quality.

The sound quality for various MP3 programs varies?? Wouldn't the sound qaulity rely on the actual sound file, and the hardware used?

he's talking about kernel streaming, which actually is just placebo.
 
Back
Top