A not quite as tough as jothaxe's problem problem

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Jothaxe

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,274
0
0
Before I was solving the equations by hand and I hoped it came out to 4' exactly.

Now after solving the equations numerically on my calculator, I get:

w = 4.0123112 feet wide.

I think this is correct. Can anyone verify?

-jothaxe
 

Jothaxe

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,274
0
0


<< The alley is 4.0123 ft wide (rounded to 4 decimals).
The answer was obtained numerically.
>>



I guess that pretty much verifies things then!

Nice!

-jothaxe
 

palad

Golden Member
Jul 18, 2000
1,586
0
0
I see what you're saying, I was thinking in 2 dimensions and wondering how you could get two ladders to intersect in an x without some creative cutting. Now I understand you're talking about the ladders leaning against opposite walls.
 

Jothaxe

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,274
0
0
Quaggoth:

You mentioned that you want to know how to solve the problem. The basic idea is to recognize the similar triangles and get some equations this way. Then use the right triangles at the bottom to get more equations. Then combine all these equations to reduce to just one variable and solve for it (numerically.)

Here is my diagram, and a rough outline of the necessary analysis.

Its too hard to do math here so I just scanned it in. :)

-jothaxe
 

Quaggoth

Senior member
Jun 23, 2000
800
0
0
OK, you are all nutz (Or I am):).

The alley is, I believe 8' wide.

we have to assume that the alley is level. The plumbline hangs straight down (Gravity will do this). since the plumbline (One side) is 3', and the triangel should be a right triangle, a2+b2=c2 :) that would be 9+16=25. The plumbline side is 3', the alley floor side is 4', and it's 5' from where the ladder butts against the wall to the intersection (The hypotenuse).

OK, I think I am wrong, because the plumbline wouldn't be in the center unless we have 2 ladders of = length. Damn, I'm nutz.
 

Quaggoth

Senior member
Jun 23, 2000
800
0
0
Hmm, too late on my last post.

Jothaxe, that seems to look right. I guess my best guess answer of 8' was a ways off. Thanks for the answer jothaxe and thEnEuRoMancER. Anyone have any more problems?
 

Jothaxe

Golden Member
Apr 5, 2001
1,274
0
0


<< Anyone have any more problems? >>



Sure thing. Let me post it in another thread though...

-jothaxe