• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A new genetic discovery

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
The findings aren't that shocking, but it'll be fun to see white supremacists squirm as they either try to claim this doesn't count or struggle with realizing that their identity is a lie. I've seen racists freak out when a DNA test shows that they have conspicuously non-caucasian genes -- imagine what happens if you tell them their whiteness is an African trait.
 
Adam/Eve were around 100,000 years ago or longer, not 6,000 years ago. Additionally, simple common sense would indicate that there must be a most recent common ancestor for all humans, it is impossible for this not to be the case. The science of DNA has proven beyond all doubt that it is a physical impossibility for the most recent common ancestor to have existed in the last 10,000 years. The Ussher chronology using the Bible is thus incorrect and God got it wrong when he recorded it. Why did God lie?
Where did you get this information?
 
Where did you get this information?

Based on what we know about the first of Homo Sapiens Sapiens it is around 200k years ago but Homo Sapiens Sapiens is not the only species of Homo Sapiens there has been. Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis is an example of another species of Homo Sapiens and there are plenty more out there.

The reason why this finding is important is because it's been argued that the lighter pigment came from interbreeding with Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis which would explain many previous findings and the fact that everyone on earth has genes that stem from Homo Sapiens Neanderthalis except for an every decreasing membership of a tribe in Sub Saharan Africa.

This is absolutely not set in stone though, some findings show that there was yet another species of Homo Sapiens that more resemble Homo Sapiens Sapiens and those findings are from Europe which might mean that there was multiple points of evolution and interbreeding much earlier than the emigration out of Africa happened (the findings are almost 400K years old).

The original Adam and Eve, which anyone who got anything above an F in middleschool biology should know, predates humanity by some 3.4 billion years.
 
FerrelGeek is correct....representations of Jesus having "ideal beauty" started appearing during the Renaissance. Your "imagined reality" needs a little work it seems.

Except that this is not true at all, during the Renaissance there were no depictions of Jesus with blue eyes and blonde hair, that didn't happen until the American Evangelicals started depicting him.

Not strange either considering the racial intolerance and the will to oppress others that was present in those times.

Here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/521010250624171844/
 
Nice collection, but that interpretation is quite passe regardless of source. That is with the possible exception of the Westboro freaks; who, btw, are pretty universally reviled by the vast majority of American Evangelicals.

Except that this is not true at all, during the Renaissance there were no depictions of Jesus with blue eyes and blonde hair, that didn't happen until the American Evangelicals started depicting him.

Not strange either considering the racial intolerance and the will to oppress others that was present in those times.

Here: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/521010250624171844/
 
It's complete and utter bullshit though. Blue eyed Jesus does not exist in Renaissance paintings.

That is quite interesting. I honestly had no idea as it's very hard to trust much of anything these days. But as I said, that interpretation has largely vanished - certainly among the evangelicals that I know. FYI, the whole notion of Jesus with long hair is very probably incorrect as well.
 
Where did you get this information?

Do a search for mitochondrial Eve.

In human genetics, the Mitochondrial Eve (also mt-Eve, mt-MRCA) is the matrilineal most recent common ancestor (MRCA) of all currently living humans, i.e., the most recent woman from whom all living humans descend in an unbroken line purely through their mothers, and through the mothers of those mothers, back until all lines converge on one woman. Mitochondrial Eve lived later than Homo heidelbergensis and the emergence of Homo neanderthalensis, but earlier than the out of Africa migration,[2] but her age is not known with certainty; a 2009 estimate cites an age between c. 152 and 234 thousand years ago (95% CI);[3] a 2013 study cites a range of 99–148 thousand years ago.[4]

Because mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is almost exclusively passed from mother to offspring without recombination (see the exception at paternal mtDNA transmission), most mtDNA in every living person differs only by the mutations that have occurred over generations in the germ cell mtDNA since the conception of the original "Mitochondrial Eve".

The male analog to the Mitochondrial Eve is the Y-chromosomal Adam, the member of Homo sapiens sapiens from whom all living humans are patrilineally descended. Rather than mtDNA, the inherited DNA in the male case is the nuclear Y chromosome. Mitochondrial Eve and Y-chromosomal Adam need not have lived at the same time.[5]

As of 2013, estimates for mt-MRCA and Y-MRCA alike are still subject to substantial uncertainty; thus, Y-MRCA has been estimated to have lived during a wide range of times from 180,000 to 581,000 years ago[6][7][8] (with a most likely age of between 120,000 and 156,000 years ago, roughly consistent with the estimate for mt-MRCA[4][9]).

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve
 
Ah...now I understand what your talking about....not the biblical Eve.

A Christian was on here asserting that mitochondrial Eve WAS the biblical Eve. I was asserting that it was impossible because Biblical Eve is around 100,000 years younger than mitochondrial Eve.
 
Back
Top