A Neo-Nazi thing, or just the usual Chinese entrepreneurs unthinking focus on anything that they can sell?

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
13,053
7,981
136
Christmas decorations with images of death camps:


Given the many examples of bizarre Chinese-made tat on Amazon (some of which have led to some classic spoof reviews), I'm guessing this was accidental. But neo-Nazis do have a liking for offensive items, I could imagine them actually buying this stuff.
 
Jan 25, 2011
16,591
8,674
146
Looks like most of the sellers were showing tourist sites from around the world. Doubt the intention was nefarious.
 

tweaker2

Lifer
Aug 5, 2000
14,537
6,975
136
Send the Chinese a design & they'll make it for you. They didn't think this one up on their own & probably didn't even understand the depiction.


A good friend of mine had started a custom stand-up paddle board manufacturing business years ago and then decided to offer a line of standard models that got made in China along with all of his technical expertise that went into manufacturing them. I'm sure at the time the Chinese manufacturer never saw or knew anything about the product itself.

Well long story short after the Chinese realized there was a high demand for his ware they re-branded his product line and started selling exact copies of his boards and undercut him badly.

Suing them would go nowhere except throwing money into a bottomless pit.

Business as usual with the stolen intellectual property scam the Chinese are notorious for.
 

1prophet

Diamond Member
Aug 17, 2005
5,313
534
126
A good friend of mine had started a custom stand-up paddle board manufacturing business years ago and then decided to offer a line of standard models that got made in China along with all of his technical expertise that went into manufacturing them. I'm sure at the time the Chinese manufacturer never saw or knew anything about the product itself.

Well long story short after the Chinese realized there was a high demand for his ware they re-branded his product line and started selling exact copies of his boards and undercut him badly.

Suing them would go nowhere except throwing money into a bottomless pit.

Business as usual with the stolen intellectual property scam the Chinese are notorious for.

Yet Americans keep at it somehow thinking things will change.

You can say whatever you want about the Chinese, but they figured out what the Soviets failed to learn during the Cold War, America's weakness was not it's military or ideology but rather its own greed which they have been using against them for over 30 years letting them think that somehow they are getting the better part of the deal by exploited Chinese people and their environment for profit without the expenses made in America brings.
American trade and political appeasement were never interpreted by Beijing as magnanimity to be reciprocated, but always as weakness to be exploited. It was always ludicrous to think that the more concessions on trade and human rights the United States gave, the more China would Westernize and begin to resemble America or a European Union nation.

Even sillier was the old shibboleth that China’s embrace of capitalist reforms — as if by some unwritten, determinist economic law — would lead to constitutional government. But the ability to buy a new cellphone never ensures the right to vote for a candidate of one’s choice.

Instead, all China did was auction off large sections of its new and more efficient economy to crony communist pseudo-capitalists and corrupt provincial officials in order to modernize the country, beef up the military, warp the international trading system — and make itself very rich.

Why did America act in such a suicidal way on China?

Cheap Chinese labor and lax American laws motivated hundreds of U.S. corporations to shut down their domestic assembly plants and relocate to China. At least at first, they were free to pay substandard wages and were mostly unregulated.

Once American businesses got hooked on mega-profits, the Chinese government slowly started stealing their technology, infringing on copyrights and patents, dumping their own merchandise on the world market at prices below production costs, running up huge trade surpluses and manipulating their currency.

But by then, American corporations were so addicted to laissez-faire profit making that they turned a blind eye and paid their hush money.

Universities cashed in too, both by setting up lucrative satellite campuses

in China and admitting tens of thousands of Chinese citizens. These Chinese students paid full tuition (and sometimes premiums and surcharges), turning once cash-strapped campuses into profitable degree mills.

Most college deans and presidents simply ignored the dreadful human rights record of China, not to mention occasional expatriate espionage rings designed to steal engineering and high-tech research.

If profits had blinded corporations to exploitive Chinese partnerships, political correctness conveniently offered academia and the media political cover — as if a mostly monoracial China was a 1.3 billion-person diverse “other” with historical grievances against a supposedly racist America.

The result was that everyone profited and all remained willfully blind to the ascendant cutthroat and dictatorial colossus.

The domestic winners in the appeasement of Communist China were the two American coasts — the New York financial industry, the Washington political lobbying nexus, Silicon Valley’s high-tech companies, and the coastal mega-research universities such Harvard, Stanford and Yale.

Suddenly, the intellectual and informational classes could sell their wares in a new global market, and they profited enormously.

Few cared about the “losers” in the now-hollowed-out Midwest and in rural America. For corporate America, domestic muscular labor could be easily and cheaply replaced by millions of Chinese workers. Outsourcing and offshoring pulled investment capital out of America and put it overseas, as Chinese-assembled products brought far greater profits.

Academics could not have cared less that the Deplorables and the working classes were being wiped out, given their politically incorrect social and cultural views.

What finally woke America up were two unforeseen developments.

First, the Chinese overreached and systematically began militarizing neutral islands in the South China Sea. They derided international commercial treaties.

In racist fashion, they treated Asian and African countries as if they were 19th-century colonies. And they unapologetically lifted technology from America’s biggest and most powerful corporations to turn China into something akin to George Orwell’s “1984.”

Meanwhile, Beijing began rounding up dissidents, cracking down in Hong Kong and “re-educating” millions of Muslims in detention camps. All that brazenness finally drove the left to drop its multicultural blinders and accept the truth of renegade Chinese oppression.

Second, Donald Trump got elected president, all the while screaming that the Chinese emperor had no clothes. The cheerleaders finally listened and admitted that China had been buck naked after all.

Now we will learn whether America woke up just in time or too late. Either way, no one will credit the loud Trump for warning that China was threatening not just the U.S. but the world as we have known it.
 

IronWing

No Lifer
Jul 20, 2001
69,052
26,935
136
No one was under any illusions about China. Americans at all levels of business did it for the money. The "Deplorables", as your columnist laments, also did it to themselves when they chose Chinese crap over more expensive American made goods. Trump isn't wrong about tariffs; he's stupid about tariffs. There's a difference. Trump's first tariffs out of the gate were on raw materials for America's most high skilled, high wage industries. His strategy on tariffs follows the 2016 Electoral College map, not any sound economic policy rationale.
 

Jhhnn

IN MEMORIAM
Nov 11, 1999
62,365
14,681
136
A good friend of mine had started a custom stand-up paddle board manufacturing business years ago and then decided to offer a line of standard models that got made in China along with all of his technical expertise that went into manufacturing them. I'm sure at the time the Chinese manufacturer never saw or knew anything about the product itself.

Well long story short after the Chinese realized there was a high demand for his ware they re-branded his product line and started selling exact copies of his boards and undercut him badly.

Suing them would go nowhere except throwing money into a bottomless pit.

Business as usual with the stolen intellectual property scam the Chinese are notorious for.

It's just that good old free market capitalism. They're good at it.