- Jun 30, 2004
- 16,625
- 2,024
- 126
Narcissism declines with age, but I'm truly pleased with my simple fan setup in my HAF midtower. Here's the summary.
1) I replaced the CM 200mm side-panel fan with the NZXT "190mm" 0.70A -- 166 CFM. Please -- don't tell me about the fan holes, or the possible noise imparted to the flimsy HAF sidepanel. I got that all covered. Sucker is QUIET at full-bore! For later reference, this fan is powered directly from the PSU.
2) Rear-exhaust is covered by a Panaflo/NMB-MAT 120x38mm FBA12G12H1BX -- 3-pin, 0.46A, 2,500rpm top-end -- connected to the CHA_FAN1 mobo-header. Complete thermal control off my ASUS P8Z68-v-pro mobo.
3) I replaced both of the "limp" Noctua fans on my NH-D14 cooler with a single Akasa Viper 140R -- a PWM fan connected to the CPU_FAN header. For later reference, the ASUS board provides a CPU_OPT_FAN PWM header in addition to the main CPU_FAN. I can't be sure if this option fan header is thermally controlled, just reviewing the BIOS and "Fan Expert" Win-software options. As posted several times to the point of exasperation -- my D14 now reduces my LinX load temperatures by another 5C.
The Viper is rated at 0.28A.
4) There is a problem with the CHA_FAN2 header on the ASUS board -- not detected until long after the Egg's return deadline, and never considered serious enough for RMA to ASUS. The header does, indeed, power fans. There is thermal control within BIOS like the CHA-FAN1, but I cannot tell if that's what's really happening: fan-speed monitoring either through ASUS AI Suite, HWMonitor or AIDA-64 shows erratic reporting of fan speed. It will alternate between 450 RPM and 220,000 RPM!!!
5) That leaves the PWR_FAN header -- not thermally controlled, but with accurate monitoring.
As far as I can tell, the motherboard will supply power up to 1.00A @ 12V to each of the headers. That would be equivalent to 60W total, or 12W per channel. I could not have misread the specs if I am so far powering 0.46A + 0.28A and the defective CHA_FAN2 or PWR_FAN port fully powers the 0.70A NZXT fan.
PROBLEM: I don't want to purchase an $80 Aquaero 5 LT controller just to thermally control one additional fan.
Here are some options -- probably in combination with each other -- which would alleviate the power draw on the motherboard and allow several fans at once to be controlled from a single PWM header. The second item may possibly allow for the 3-pin Panaflo and NZXT fans to be integrated into the PWM mix:
http://www.sidewindercomputers.com/sw8waypwmsps.html
http://www.svc.com/pwmx.html
This would add some "complexity" where I'd managed to achieve "simplicity." The main questions: Has anyone tried these items? And are they likely to work together without a problem? Are they reliable? Is there any risk to the motherboard?
The other possibility: If the CHA_FAN2 header simply supplies the requisite power to -- say -- the 0.70A fan, and it still varies the fan speed as a "percentage" based on CPU temperature, then I should be able to run the tach-wire and another 3-pin plug to the PWR_FAN port so I get control plus monitoring.
Any comments on this fan-header problem, in addition to thoughts about the other questions I posed?
Thank you!
The Duckster-Meister
1) I replaced the CM 200mm side-panel fan with the NZXT "190mm" 0.70A -- 166 CFM. Please -- don't tell me about the fan holes, or the possible noise imparted to the flimsy HAF sidepanel. I got that all covered. Sucker is QUIET at full-bore! For later reference, this fan is powered directly from the PSU.
2) Rear-exhaust is covered by a Panaflo/NMB-MAT 120x38mm FBA12G12H1BX -- 3-pin, 0.46A, 2,500rpm top-end -- connected to the CHA_FAN1 mobo-header. Complete thermal control off my ASUS P8Z68-v-pro mobo.
3) I replaced both of the "limp" Noctua fans on my NH-D14 cooler with a single Akasa Viper 140R -- a PWM fan connected to the CPU_FAN header. For later reference, the ASUS board provides a CPU_OPT_FAN PWM header in addition to the main CPU_FAN. I can't be sure if this option fan header is thermally controlled, just reviewing the BIOS and "Fan Expert" Win-software options. As posted several times to the point of exasperation -- my D14 now reduces my LinX load temperatures by another 5C.
The Viper is rated at 0.28A.
4) There is a problem with the CHA_FAN2 header on the ASUS board -- not detected until long after the Egg's return deadline, and never considered serious enough for RMA to ASUS. The header does, indeed, power fans. There is thermal control within BIOS like the CHA-FAN1, but I cannot tell if that's what's really happening: fan-speed monitoring either through ASUS AI Suite, HWMonitor or AIDA-64 shows erratic reporting of fan speed. It will alternate between 450 RPM and 220,000 RPM!!!
5) That leaves the PWR_FAN header -- not thermally controlled, but with accurate monitoring.
As far as I can tell, the motherboard will supply power up to 1.00A @ 12V to each of the headers. That would be equivalent to 60W total, or 12W per channel. I could not have misread the specs if I am so far powering 0.46A + 0.28A and the defective CHA_FAN2 or PWR_FAN port fully powers the 0.70A NZXT fan.
PROBLEM: I don't want to purchase an $80 Aquaero 5 LT controller just to thermally control one additional fan.
Here are some options -- probably in combination with each other -- which would alleviate the power draw on the motherboard and allow several fans at once to be controlled from a single PWM header. The second item may possibly allow for the 3-pin Panaflo and NZXT fans to be integrated into the PWM mix:
http://www.sidewindercomputers.com/sw8waypwmsps.html
http://www.svc.com/pwmx.html
This would add some "complexity" where I'd managed to achieve "simplicity." The main questions: Has anyone tried these items? And are they likely to work together without a problem? Are they reliable? Is there any risk to the motherboard?
The other possibility: If the CHA_FAN2 header simply supplies the requisite power to -- say -- the 0.70A fan, and it still varies the fan speed as a "percentage" based on CPU temperature, then I should be able to run the tach-wire and another 3-pin plug to the PWR_FAN port so I get control plus monitoring.
Any comments on this fan-header problem, in addition to thoughts about the other questions I posed?
Thank you!
The Duckster-Meister
Last edited: