• Guest, The rules for the P & N subforum have been updated to prohibit "ad hominem" or personal attacks against other posters. See the full details in the post "Politics and News Rules & Guidelines."

A Metro : LL review (spoilers ahoy)

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
12,074
1,287
126


Hello, I'm Troy McClure, and you might remember me for the negative review i gave of Skyrim, among others.

I was unhappy with Skyrim's combat and questing mechanics, and i feel that Metro is pretty bad as well. So, if you thought my views on Skyrim were BS, you're welcome to ignore this review.

I played (most of) Metro: Last Light on a E6600@3.2 and a 7750, settings on LOW, and while my framerate wasn't the best, it was still playable;

The graphics, namely the amount of detail that went into the environment, is astounding. Even on Low, it still looks impressive. The models are very detailed and unusual, and the locations have an incredible amount of detail. Animations are nothing special, and most of the time are incredibly slow;

The story is similar to Metro 2033, in you playing the character of Artyom, a member of the Spartan Rangers, one of the factions which have sprung up in post-apocalyptic Moskov's subway tunnels. After having destroyed the Dark Ones (friendly invaders from space .. ) in the previous game, he now quests for the last Dark One baby, travelling through the metro, facing perils coming from both humans and monsters alike.

For the vast majority, MLL is a quicktime-based, fully scripted FPS adventure game, with some redundant stealth sections built in.

The first six hours gameplay i experienced involve your character slowly walking in closed locations waiting for the animated models of NPCs to open a door, or perform another similar action that allows you to progress to the FPS sections. During these extended scenes the plot and characters are explained;

Now, if you have ever played any EA shootie thingie game of the past ten years, you know the plot. The dramatization of events is so "bog" standard (lol) that daytime tv easily surpasses it in writing quality.

The all-too-brief gameplay sections between these enormous, "interactive cutscenes", are either a couple of rooms of stealth mechanics a'la Splinter Cell, on-rails shooting, or corridor crawling.

The stealth sections look nice, but your character is so ridiculously OP (basic handgun one-shots everything, and that's just the "basic" one, plus you get quite a lot more ammo than the previous outing, and upgrades are easy to get) that they pose no challenge whatsoever - crouch, headshot the headlamp-wearing dudes, activate target, and enjoy another scripted event.

On rails shooting is even worse, with infinite monsters, which must be shot at when they are "clinging on to the thing-you-are-riding", in what is essntially a quicktime event where the player presses mouse1 rather than E. (also, you have seen this thing a million times already)

Corridor crawling is somewhat better, with the scavenging of useful ammo in every nook and cranny, yet the mobs' tendency to disappear in "holes in the wall" to give the player that atmospheric feel (and thus not targeting you properly) mean that you can simply walk or run your way to the end ignoring any danger.. of which there is little, as regenerating helath and plentiful medikits assure the continuation of your adventure to watch more scripted events.

The rare, occasional open-space FPS sections are more rewarding, yet even here the infinite mobs, arbitrary invisible walls (water), time constraints of your gas mask's filter, and the general nastyness of being in an environment which the developers want to remind you, will make your vision very, very blurred, mean that it's often best to just plot your way around the map, and sprint to the objective.

I see a great fault here, as the aforementioned great visuals simply muddle down to a cracked mask visor with various kinds of goo mashed on it, making the experience more akin to playing a normal game with a jar of peanut butter smeared on your monitor, than feeling a sense of dread and impending doom that other titles (titles which enjoy having many fullstops in the name) have successfully summoned before.

MLL's faults dont end with mud on your face or mobs immune to damage when performing the "i'm wounded!" animation;

The pacing is absolutely horrid. I have more than once gone AFK waiting for a really uninteresting story to unfold so i could play the bloody game. The animations are dreadfully slow, the fake russian accent is truly unnecessary, the plot itself is so trite you really need to be too young for the PEGI rating to not have seen it before; the Red Sonja sniper, the too-friendly scoundrel who betrays you, the rough commander who can't see the obvious, the wise old Hunter who has read the script, and so forth... and so forth. And did someone say this game had good music in it? That was your WinAmp launching, not Metro.

Graphics-wise, i feel that my GPU should be sufficient to play a title on Low, yet MLL has serious issues with textures, most notably lights, which too often completely bork out, breaking in black pixels. I accept that a title touted as a gpu-killer isn't where i should look for great optimization, but it would have been a few extra points that MLL really needs.
I also accept that the developers didn't have a monster budget, so comparing this to Far Cry 3 (which ran perfectly on my hardware) is a bit daft, but then again i also have terrible memories of Deep Silver's quality control, and i wouldn't be surprised if their QA was limited to a block of post-it notes with "will not fix" written on them.

In the end, my take is that Metro Last Light suffers from Electronicatrsitis, in that it tries to be too much like Black Ops but fails becasuse of poor project direction; as if someone had a $4mil budget to make a film, and spent it all on four $1mil actors and an iPhone, ignoring all the additional work and talent needed to make an idea into something which captures your imagination and holds your interest.

An example of what i mean can be seen here, in the Fortunate Son / Vietnam section of BLOPS:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ygjr5GXTH3c
Now, that's how you introduce characters, that's how you keep a story moving. The pacing is just perfect.
In that game there are plenty of "infinite mobs" sections, yet the direction is so good you never notice it. Feel free to ingore the models, the dust, the helicopters, the facial animation. All this could have been done by MLL with a little camera rotation and model movement that wasn't so frikking slow.

Another example is Amnesia's water level; although the mob is invisible, he does not "dematerialize"; he might be out of reach to you, but it can still threathen you, as he's always into play. In MLL, showing me a mob i can shoot at crawling into a hole in the wall is redundant, if my hitting it or not makes no difference - as he will pop out again fresh as a daisy in a few seconds because "it has been scripted".

And (a title which has many full stops in its name) has done everything which MLL tries to do with mutants but better. Ammo availability, using the environment to hide, radiation, persistent mobs, weapon mechanics, bad russian accents .. and no f* quick time events.

MLL is sadly no longer on my PC; i grew tired of scripted events. I also grew tired of having to wipe my mask every five seconds, which isn't - in my humble opinion - not so much as enticing, as it is irritating. If you feel you must really buy this game, do yourself a favour, and get it on console.

Metro's last light will be much more enjoyable from a comfy couch and bigscreen TV than from a kb/m, and maybe bring a friend too, so while you watch some spiderweb burn awesomely, you can both go WOW very loudly and maybe that will cover up the horrible voice acting, and shut out the pitiful characters and story.

Also you can take turns playing when you die to invisible walls.
 
Last edited:

ibex333

Diamond Member
Mar 26, 2005
3,969
66
91
I was unhappy with Skyrim's combat and questing mechanics, and i feel that Metro is pretty bad as well.
Stopped reading right here. You are clearly drunk or not right in the head somehow. Go sleep it off, then come back and talk to me. Metro Last Light is one of the best games to EVER come out. Unlike you, I DID finish the game, and I think it is nothing short of a masterpiece.
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
12,074
1,287
126
Stopped reading right here. You clearly clearly have a different opinion than me and i am not willing to read it (but i will threadcrap your review). Metro Last Light is one of the best games to EVER come out, and I think it is nothing short of a masterpiece, and therefore i am right and anybody who has a different opinion must be wrong.
Fixed it for ya. thank me later bro.
 

FalseChristian

Diamond Member
Jan 7, 2002
3,322
0
71
I love Metro: Last Light. It's one the best games since Quake to come out. The graphics are amazing and it runs great on my GTX 460 1GB SLI setup at 1680x1050.
 

clok1966

Golden Member
Jul 6, 2004
1,395
13
76
Well as its an opinion I cant say its wrong.. but some parts..

"The all-too-brief gameplay sections between these enormous, "interactive cutscenes", are either a couple of rooms of stealth mechanics a'la Splinter Cell, on-rails shooting, or corridor crawling."

-funny, me and pretty much every reviewer i have read say the cut scenes were short and could have been longer (I can quote reviews, but it seems silly as basically ANY (google) say they are short) of the 10 or so I have read. again that pesky opinion thing.. I tend to lean towards majority says on those things.



"Now, if you have ever played any EA shootie thingie game of the past ten years, you know the plot. The dramatization of events is so "bog" standard (lol) that daytime tv easily surpasses it in writing quality."

-This was actually wrote by the guy who did the original novel.. its 100% new.. and while not worth a whole new book in terms of story, its far better then 99% of FPS games, and 1000% better then the EA stuff.. "me, sad burnt out military man sent to kill all that moves"

"The stealth sections look nice, but your character is so ridiculously OP (basic handgun one-shots everything, and that's just the "basic" one, plus you get quite a lot more ammo than the previous outing, and upgrades are easy to get) that they pose no challenge whatsoever - crouch, headshot the headlamp-wearing dudes, activate target, and enjoy another scripted event."

-Handgun was not bad against Humans (show me a shooter that a head shot on a human is not a insta kill, all FPS do this), all but worthless against mutants. I guess playing on easy is.. well, easy.. Now comes the part where you tell me you played on some other difficulty setting, of course you did.. when (again, other reviews) don't mention anything easy.. and I found it about right at normal difficulty, not pull your hair out, and not bang your dead..


so much seem like rage.. FPS are wore out.. many of us agree.. but this game is better then the average one.

Now if you want to point out issues.. the game glitchs bad at at times, people stuck in walls etc.. faces not moving when talking, weird hitbox issues with cover. Bad guys standing on you or by you and ignoring you. And the real kicker, something to actually hate on.. the DLC is about 40% of the game.. pay your $50-60 and get only part of the game.. BAD BAD BAD...


just my opinions.. If you enjoyed the original Metro.. this one is less buggy (still buggy, and sadly most are at end of game.. rush job?), the (English) voice acting while not great, is better, the guns have more recoil, feel better then the originals so actually make take a tiny bit more skill to use. The RANGER DLC is a must as it makes the game .. ranger MODE is the only way to play.
 

monster88

Member
Oct 30, 2012
63
0
0
Stopped reading right here. You are clearly drunk or not right in the head somehow. Go sleep it off, then come back and talk to me. Metro Last Light is one of the best games to EVER come out. Unlike you, I DID finish the game, and I think it is nothing short of a masterpiece.
lol same....
 

AdamK47

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
13,591
968
126
It has been 7 years and I just started playing the Redux version before moving on to Exodus.

Your review has the "I'm going to be negative on a thing that most other people like" kind of vibe to it.
 

CP5670

Diamond Member
Jun 24, 2004
4,917
253
126
I only played the first Metro, and loved the atmosphere in it but the gameplay and combat were pretty bland, worse than some earlier FPSs I can think of. I have this one on GOG too and might try it at some point.

As for playing from a couch with a TV, that's true of most games. You can play on a PC with a mouse/KB from a distance, which is still the best way to play FPSs.
 

ZGR

Golden Member
Oct 26, 2012
1,867
286
126
I liked Metro 2033, and I did enjoy Metro Last Light.

I got too frustrated and refunded Metro Exodus. I would do the same for the Redux builds too for one reason: Forced TAA. The non redux versions are crisp, but in redux versions, it is a blurry mess. Disabling TAA causes extreme shimmering.

Still annoyed at this forced TAA thing.
 

DigDog

Lifer
Jun 3, 2011
12,074
1,287
126
It has been 7 years and I just started playing the Redux version before moving on to Exodus.

Your review has the "I'm going to be negative on a thing that most other people like" kind of vibe to it.
i had more fun playing Killzone on the analog sticks of my PS2 controller 21 years ago.
i had more fun playing Timesplitters 1, 2 and 3.

this list is long. there is no point in continuing.
 

ASK THE COMMUNITY