Originally posted by: Vic
You couldn't wear contacts before?
IMO, Oakleys are overpriced POS's with terrible optics (flame away).
Are you more competent to test sunglass optics than an independant optical test lab?
Private Pilot magazine sunglass test, September 2003 Issue
Rating scores based on independent, accredited measurements as conducted by ICS Laboratories, Inc. Brunswick, OH 44212
Objective: Contract testing of refractive and prismatic properties of various sunglass models purchased at retail.
Procedure: A random sample of 65 pairs of sunglasses, all considered to be popular models were purchased on the open market. The samples were sent to ICS Laboratories, Inc. of Brunswick, Ohio. There, the samples were tested on the proper head form for the following ANSI Z87.1 tests: Prismatic Power, Refractive Power, Prismatic Imbalance. Astigmatism, and Definition. Upon completion of the testing at ICS Laboratories, the samples that passed the ANSI Z87.1 test were taken to Dr. Nelso Jun. O.D. for further definition testing.
POLARIZED SCORE
Oakley Square Wire 2.0 97.2
Von Zipper All Day 89.1
Tommy Bahama Konalea 86.5
Arnette Steel Swinger 83.2
Giorgio Armani 1521 83.1
MEN'S SPORT SCORE
Oakley Splice 98.1
NYX Classic Competition 91.3
Ray Ban RB4004 87.4
Von Zipper Backseat 85.4
Persol 2634 84.9
WOMEN'S SPORT SCORE
Oakley Fate 94.1
Dragon Lucy 83.0
Guess Scandal SS67-F 81.6
Dita Speed 81.0
Gucci 1430 79.5
Link
Test Lab link
Propaganda, perhaps -- or maybe they're just flaunting their scores.