• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A Few Pins shy of a full socket!?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I'm going to state this slowly, so you understand it: "There are socket 939 Semprons in the OEM market!"

Ok ill say this slowly... so you undersyand.. haha Show me where i can buy a 939 sempron CPU by itself? Show me where AMD says they make a 939 sempron chip.

I went to HP looked and you can look.. http://www.shopping.hp.com/webapp/shopp...s&catLevel=2&tab_switch=true&tab=specs

there is nothing on the page that says its a 939 socket sempron..
There is nothing on the page that says its a 939 motherboard....
They give you the option of buying a sempron CPU.. and if you buy one you will get a 754 CPU on a 754 mobo. Yes you can get up to a 3.7 Gh althon 64 chip in the 754 socket type made with a clawhammer core.

People buying their notebooks are not given the option of 754 or 939 mobo.. The 754 mb is cheaper than the 939, and HP will sell the 754 to you and let you think you are getting a 939.
WHY! because when you want to upgrade their computer they can gig you again..

I can't find proof of a 3.8 or 4Gh 754 cpu but im sure if they had one clawhammer would be the man.

Now im also sure HP has a 939 MB which will house a 3.8 and 4.0 cpu.. but im sure hp isnt going to sale you that unless they have to.. Why?! so they can gig you on the upgrade option later down the road..

Leading to the orginal question of, " Is there proof of a 939 socket sempron, and where could one be had? "

However, the point it moot. By the time someone dose offer proof the price of the chips will change so much it wouldnt realy matter.

Hopefully today the person who wants this mess will come off the 50$ so i can end my headache.
 
Not if you run a shop. People look at prices and whine at you because "OMG! It's $50 more!!!".

Well, i got of out the trade because of things like that. However when a person asks, can you upgrade my system for under 400$ and make it to where i wont have to upgrade(overhaul) again for a few more years. I say i do not know let me look into the matter.

The System is an AMd K6 800. Which is maxed out on the chip.. with a 250w Powersupply. running win 98, Very old Pc. (How it lived this long i have no idea.)

They need a new MB, New Video card, CPU, power supply, hd, memory, and winXP.

Ok I don't want to recomend a 754 when 939 x2 capable (sempron/Athlon 64/ 64/x2) MB's cost a little more $ but they will get the exstra year out of it on CPU options, when the price drops over the next year.
I personally HATE with a purple passion VIA chipsets.. but that is a topic for another forum. So im giong to go with the Nforce chips.

Ok so i find some MB's with Nforce4 chips that support x2 tech and the slowest cpu that can be placed on the board is 3.0
Which when you have to fit everything else in the budget complicates things a bit.. and the OMG 50$ Diffrence comes up.
Which is why i asked.. If i could buy the 754 socket and place it on the 939 board. (BECAUSE THE MB MAN said they had sempron's tested on 939 board, Seemed nuts, impossible, and insane. However i dont know everything so...I asked.)
The person is not looking for a gaming pc, there for they do not care about the slight diffrences between this chip and that chip.. Not to mention anything faster than the 800 Mhrz is going to blow thier mind..
I told them i could do it for 550$ all name brand new parts. However, they are doing the OMG 150$ thing.. what can i do?!

So i hope you understand why i asked this cheap question.. It's not my money.

 
Some ideas...

Western Digital 120 GB hard drive $74 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16822144118

NEC ND3540A DVD-RW $50 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16827152053

Fortron 400 watt $40 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16817104953

Antec case $52 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16811129152

Corsair 512 MB $50 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16820145026

motherboards from some of the better brands (that are less $$)
Abit $86 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813127221

Abit $102 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813127222

DFI $89 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813136160

DFI $98 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813136163

MSI $74 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813130514

MSI $85 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16813130491

So, let?s say $90 for motherboard and then $74 HD, $50 DVD, $40 PSU, $52 case and $50 RAM.
So far, that?s $356 US.

X550 video card $65 US
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814102562

or, you can always get an X300 or 6200 Turbo cache

Athlon 3000+
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103537

Yes, you can save on case & PSU with an Antec with a built-in Antec 350w psu.
 
If I understand you correctly, someone has asked you to ?upgrade? their system. Since they probably wouldn?t know what parts to get you are doing the legwork and adding in some of your own preferences (like being able to upgrade or avoiding chipsets that may be troublesome). That sounds normal, the only problem is you may be adding in a little to much of your own preferences.

If they have made it this long on a K-6 (BTW there is no 800MHz K-6 and I don?t know of any K-6 that overclocked that high) then it?s not unreasonable to think that they will not upgrade the processor (or any other component for that matter) as long as it still works. Their next upgrade will probably be a major overhaul just like this one is going to be.

I don?t think there is a problem if you want to avoid VIA but that still leaves 4 other chipset brands to choose from (nVidia, ATi, SiS and ULi). While nVidia is the performance and feature leader that most non-enthusiasts will see little difference in performance and have little to no use for the extra features.

Going socket 939 could be a plus but if it doesn?t fit their budget there is nothing inherently wrong with socket 754, especially for a non-enthusiast.

The bottom line is, with a $400 budget most OEMs are either Celerons, socket A or socket 754 Semprons, so if you can beat the OEM configurations for the same price you are helping this person out, if you cant beat the OEMs then recommend an OEM system to them.
 
Originally posted by: justly
the only problem is you may be adding in a little to much of your own preferences.

Don't we see a lot of that around here? :disgust: "Typical" post:

Q: "Hey, can anyone recommend a cheap motherboard? I only have $50 and I already have a Celeron 2.4GHz CPU and all the other parts. I just need the machine to be able to web browse."

A: "Celerons teh suxor. Get a socket 939 Athlon 64 and a DFI board. Oh yeah, don't forget the name brand $100 power supply."

A more helpful answer would be closer to, "Let's see, a quality Asus P4S8X-MX can be had for under $50 and meets all your other requirements." I won't argue that the DFI board and Athlon 64 would be "better" but it wouldn't browse web pages much faster.

If we all were wealthy we all would probably purchase whatever is the "best" even if we don't need it. However, we aren't all wealthy, so we have to make decisions based on our needs and budget, not someone elses needs and budget.
 
Originally posted by: aurrous
They give you the option of buying a sempron CPU.. and if you buy one you will get a 754 CPU on a 754 mobo.

Here's your proof. Please stop saying I'm wrong when you don't even _bother_ to check out my claims.
http://img166.imageshack.us/my.php?image=64bitsempron9zt.jpg

You can get this independently confirmed at zv6000forums.com if you insist on being a moron about it. There is only _no_ 754 motherboard for the zv6000. This has been confirmed numerous times.

-Erwos

 
Ok mister justly.. i may have made a mistake.. it is a and athlon 800 tbird which is overclocked to 1.1-1.2 on a motherboard that will house a maximum of a 1.4 CPU.

ok this is what i came up with and how i got to 550$ the only places i can see me knocking off price is on the hd, cpu, and os.. enough to affect the price vs part quality.
I would like ot me able to find a good EOM OS , but right now i can't seem to find one.
And if could find a 939 sempron (that i could BUY alone.) well that might get me back into the ball park. the cheaper hd.. i think thats price is very good personally.

Case
Powmax 450w 3 fan case. 1 front, 1-led side fan 40$/ free sh
I will install 6 exstra usb ports. 3 front, 3 back. So the user could use all 10 ports that the mb has.
http://www.edazz.com/poatxmidtoca.html

MB
Msi K8n Neo4-f (supports up to a fx55 cpu) for 76$ + sh
http://www.compu-terra.com/store/product2174.html

Cpu
Amd athlon 64 3.0 1g fsb Venice sock 939 for 146$/ free ship
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16819103537

memory Kingston 512 ddr400 (3200) 46$ 2.6v
http://www.chiefvalue.com/app/productdetails.asp?submit=property&item=20-141-424

Suggested?
corsair 1g 2x512 dual c ddr400 (3200) 94.49$ w/sh
http://www.chiefvalue.com/app/productdetails.asp?linkid=110&item=20-145-440

Hd
Seagate 120 Sata 1.5 g 8mb barracuda for 77$ / FSH
http://www.monarchcomputer.com/Merchant...duct_Code=150614&AFFIL=pricewatch&NR=1

Video.
Msi GFroce 6200tc pcie 256-retail 57$/ fsh
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=MSI-P62C6S

Cd-rom/dvd
optorite 52/32/52/16x- ratail 29$/ wsh
http://www.ewiz.com/detail.php?name=GCC-4521BI

Os win Xp home 85$
http://www.amamax.com/swspecialwinxphmdsp.html

And I install the new software, and transfer old info off pc..

total 550$ To me, I see that as one hell of a deal for them.. (I?m not making any money off the deal, so it wont hurt my feelings if they say no.)

I could build a 754 system for around/under 300$ however, i feel it would have to be overhauled again in 1-3 years vs. the 3-5 years you could get out of the 939.
Lets face it the 940's are on the market all ready... the M2's are about to be released making the 754 a 4th generation computer, and maybe the 940s will last as long as the slot A did.. who knows.. but i would rather make someone a 3rd gen computer computer and feel better that it will last a little longer and they might be able to get more of their money out of it in the long run. A fx 57 chip clocks/overclocks at close to/over 5g's but the price of the chip is 900$ so in a few years if they want to upgrade they can get a fx 57 chip for less than they bought the 3.0, change operating systems and video cards if need be.. and get an exstra year out of it..

Tell me if you think im wrong..

And yes i do agree its easy to take advantage of someone elses budget.

However, i know from experience how much trouble pinching a penny can get you when building a pc.
 
Originally posted by: aurrous
Hopefully today the person who wants this mess will come off the 50$ so i can end my headache.
I think the headache is your own doing, for trying to come up with reasons why you think this person should spend the extra to get socket 939. Let me explain...

Originally posted by: aurrous
The person is not looking for a gaming pc, there for they do not care about the slight diffrences between this chip and that chip.. Not to mention anything faster than the 800 Mhrz is going to blow thier mind..
This means even a non-overclocked socket 754 Sempron should do the trick.

Originally posted by: aurrous
I am trying to put the cheapest CPU for the buck that I can find on the most upgradeable motherboard
Cheapest CPU on most upgradeable motherboard would mean a s754 Sempron on one of those boards with dual sockets (both s754 and s939). End of question.

Originally posted by: aurrous
Ok I don't want to recomend a 754 when 939 x2 capable (sempron/Athlon 64/ 64/x2) MB's cost a little more $ but they will get the exstra year out of it on CPU options, when the price drops over the next year.
This person will NOT upgrade the CPU even after price drops next year. Why do I know this? FIRST, you were already told to stay within a budget. SECOND...

Originally posted by: aurrous
Ok mister justly.. i may have made a mistake.. it is a and athlon 800 tbird which is overclocked to 1.1-1.2 on a motherboard that will house a maximum of a 1.4 CPU.
Since the motherboard has an 800MHz CPU and could take a 1.4GHz CPU, why didn't this person upgrade to a 1.4GHz after a year's worth of price drops? Could it be that (drum roll plz) this is not the type of person to do upgrades in a year? Or two? Or three?

This is also evidence that even getting the newest socket DOES NOT guarantee "future proof" upgrades.

Scenario A
You get the newest socket A chipset, what, KT133A supporting the new 133MHz FSB just to "future proof" your purchase. After 5 years you are happy to see that socket A is still being used with up to 3GHz (rated) CPUs. So, you buy one and pop it into your computer... only to find out it doesn't work with your now outdated motherboard.

Scenario B
You get the newest socket 478 chipset, what, 845PE supporting the new 533MHz FSB just to "future proof" your purchase. After a few years you are happy to see that socket 478 is still being used with up to 3.4GHz CPUs. So, you buy one and pop it into your computer... only to find out it doesn't work with your now outdated motherboard.

Scenario C
You get the newest socket 939 chipset, what, K8T800 supporting the new Athlon 64 socket just to "future proof" your purchase. After two years you are happy to see that socket 939 is still being used with up to 4.8GHz (rated) "x2" CPUs. So, you buy one and pop it into your computer... only to find out it doesn't work with your now outdated motherboard.

What I'm getting at is that everyone wanting to "future proof" by getting the newest/greatest and expecting a simple upgrade down the line is just fooling themselves. If you want the latest/greatest, get it BECAUSE it is the latest/greatest. Don't use "future proof" as an excuse.

Also, besides the actual CPU support there are other changes in technology that can "outdate" a motherboard. That old 800MHz Athlon doesn't have USB 2.0 onboard, does it? It doesn't have SATA onboard, does it? It doesn't have 5.1/7.1 sound onboard (perhaps with that Azalia(sp) HD audio) onboard, does it? There are other reasons to change motherboard besides just for faster CPUs. Sure, buy a PCI sound card, PCI SATA card, PCI USB card, but then you could have just bought a new motherboard with everything already on it.

Speaking of "outdate" a computer rarely becomes "outdated" in that it CANNOT do something new, it just cannot do it as well as something new. The only huge example I can think of from recent times is the game Battlefield 2. When the game came out I was still using a Geforce4 Ti4200 video card. Did this make my computer magically outdated? Nah, just toss in another video card. Indeed I recently played in a BF2 tournament at a LAN center on organizer supplied computers which were AthlonXP 2500+ with ATI 9800Pro video. Played the game great, even though the systems weren't socket 939. What of non games?

"The person is not looking for a gaming pc"

Isn't that what you wrote? When was the last non-game software you can think of that made even the 800MHz Athlon "obsolete?" What upcoming software will make the 800MHz Athlon "obsolete?"

Originally posted by: aurrous
I could build a 754 system for around/under 300$ however, i feel it would have to be overhauled again in 1-3 years vs. the 3-5 years you could get out of the 939.
Lets face it the 940's are on the market all ready... the M2's are about to be released making the 754 a 4th generation computer, and maybe the 940s will last as long as the slot A did.. who knows..
Socket 940 was one of the first on the market. It is for servers/workstations and multi-CPU, so don't consider it for your purpose of upgrading a friend's computer.

"Who knows?"

Your words, not mine, but I agree with you. Who knows what the future may bring? AMD may come out with a Sempron 4000+ (perhaps running 2.4GHz with 256k cache) for socket 754 due to OEM demands. AMD may want to switch to M2 quickly, and not only stop making faster socket 939 CPUs, but start phasing out production of socket 939 Athlon 64 CPUs. We. Simply. Don't. Know. Both AMD and Intel have been known to change their roadmaps. Basing a purchase on a belief of being "future proof" is being naive.

Here's another thought for you... "Minimum System Requirements." BF2 aside, most software publishers want their software to have the lowest minimum system requirements possible to be able to run their software. Why? They know that the majority of people out there do not have a "cutting edge" computer, and will not likely have one ever. By making sure their software operates with low requirements they can take advantage of a larger possible consumer base.

It's just like with anything else in life. Let's use automobiles as an example. Would anyone argue that a Mercedes Benz car is better than a Kia? No? Well, if so then why doesn't everyone buy a Mercedez Benz?

Let's use bicycles as an example. Would anyone argue that a Trek bicycle is better than a department store Huffy? No? Well, if so then why doesn't everyone buy a Trek?

Let's use computers as an example. Would anyone argue that socket 939 is better than socket 754? No? Well, if so then why doesn't everyone buy socket 939?

It is because of budget and needs. A hardcore gamer/benchmarker may need that better computer. Heck, I've encountered wealthy people that buy the "best" computer at the store just because they can afford it and just do web browsing/word processing with it.

OMG, my post is getting too long. Anyone (especially aurrous) still reading at this point, you get a brownie for your efforts. My ultimate point is that you (aurrous) fell into the trap that many others here do of "spend more because it is better" without due consideration to the whole story. When dealing with someone else's money and needs, figure out what is best for them, not what is best for someone else.

Originally posted by: aurrous
Case Powmax 450w 3 fan case. 1 front, 1-led side fan 40$/ free sh
MB Msi K8n Neo4-f (supports up to a fx55 cpu) for 76$ + sh
Cpu Amd athlon 64 3.0 1g fsb Venice sock 939 for 146$/ free ship
memory Kingston 512 ddr400 (3200) 46$ 2.6v
Suggested? corsair 1g 2x512 dual c ddr400 (3200) 94.49$ w/sh
Hd Seagate 120 Sata 1.5 g 8mb barracuda for 77$ / FSH
Video Msi GFroce 6200tc pcie 256-retail 57$/ fsh
Cd-rom/dvd optorite 52/32/52/16x- ratail 29$/ wsh
Os win Xp home 85$
This is not a bad start. Since this isn't for resale, I have some suggestions for this person to save money.

HDD, check the Hot Deals forum because this week there are many, many rebate deals for anywhere from $30-50 for 120-200GB EIDE drives. Now, the ones with great deals are not SATA, but that doesn't make a lick of performance difference and it makes for easier Windows installs (no need to press F6 and have a floppy drive). Make the person buy their own drive and mail in their own rebate.

Case, I'd suggest something a bit different. This is one time I'd tell you to spend more. There are often rebate deals (check Hot Deals) on Antec cases with power supply for under $50 after rebate. Better quality case and power supply. If deals can't be found get a case and a separate budget (but still good) power supply. Note that almost ALL of the included power supplies won't have the 24pin motherboard connector that most socket 939 boards use (unless Antec Smart Power 2.0). Most boards will run okay without it, but makes it that much more important to have a decent power supply. Note that "decent" does not mean "expensive." Directron.com has HEC and TTGI power supplies starting at just under $30 that are really good for their price. You can also find lower wattage Fortrons for around that price. Stepping up to 24pin... dunno, haven't looked but you can probably still find something around that range that is decent. If case deal has a rebate, make the person buy it and sent in the rebate.

Memory, for their needs 512MB single channel probably wouldn't kill them. Get the 1GB if their budget allows, otherwise 512MB is fine. Sacrilege I know.

Motherboard/CPU/video: Here are some choices.
1) ECS RS480-M s939 ATI Radeon XPRESS 200 motherboard $75 shipped, add cheapest 3000+ CPU and use onboard video. Since this person isn't a gamer and the onboard video is actually capable of running games, should work just fine. You'd get your socket 939 that you wanted for this person, plus there's a PCI-E 16x slot for video upgrades if needed. Roughly $225 total.

2) JetWay GTDual-STD-G-OC Socket 754 and 939 NVIDIA nForce4 motherboard $90 shipped, plus cheapest socket 754 Sempron and cheapest PCI-E video. Will be upgradeable to better video and the precious socket 939 CPUs if needed. Roughly $210 total

3) ECS 760GX-M Socket 754 SiS 760 GX motherboard $52 shipped, plus cheapest socket 754 Sempron and use onboard video. AGP slot for upgrades if needed in the future. This is cheapest setup at around $110 for mobo/video/CPU and makes for a great non-gaming/non-overclocking platform.

4) Chaintech VNF3-250 nForce3 250 motherboard $57 shipped, plus cheapest socket 754 Sempron and use cheapest AGP video card. This is a known good overclocker motherboard. For the price of the cheapest socket 939 CPU alone, you can get a CPU/mobo/video, about $150.

For just over $400 you can get the Chaintech setup, Windows XP, 512MB RAM, optical drive, 160GB HDD AR, Antec case/power AR. Comparing it to a near $600 socket 939 setup for non-gaming use, you'd get 99% of the performance and 80% of the upgradability for 66% of the cost.

My wife's bugging me so I gotta go... 😉
 
Zap is right, the quotes Zap used are telltale signs that this person is not getting what they need from your help.

I considered posting something similar to what Zap did, and then I realized I would be wasting my time. Since I?m not in the habit of wasting time trying to help people that obviously don?t want my opinion I feel it is best to let you handle this on your own.

Zap, thanks for the brownie 😀
 
I'm glad someone said that AMD and Intel both change their roadmaps. I asked about that and no one answered.

Anyway, yeah, budget + future proof = nonsense
The only wait to be future proof right now is to get a dual core processor so you can use multithreaded programs when they come out. But, by the time they start coming out in droves, we'll have socket M2.

So, I'm one of those people who has nothing against the socket 754 and the Sempron 3100+ for example.

I mean, in following years, we're going to see quad cores, 16 cores etc...
 
I do thank you for the long post, and I did read it fully.
And I repay the favor with.. well, a longer than long post.. im not even sure if it will make sense

My greatest concern in their "best interest" is this... Like me the person just changed Carriers, this person moved into Piping and Mechanical Engineering. Their old computer chokes badly on cad- running and rendering the 3d models, and calculation and saving the archiving the final project to DVD (external 4x). It?s not gaming, but sometimes the projects are huge, bigger than just surfing the web, or casual computer use. And yes the system does meet the MIN requirements of the programs he is using. Still slower than snot.

My computer is Intel P4 3.2g notebook with 1gig of memory, 9800 ATI all-in-wonder, 80ghd, 17? screen.
Sometimes mine takes forever to do what he wants to do. Like I said in my first post, I have not built a pc in a long time, and I?m not up to snuff on new PC technology.

I do not know if there is a real difference speed wise between ultra ATA and SATA, when it comes to the CAD Applications. I can say I can get a Seagate 160 ultra ATA for 29.00 after 80$ check at BestBuy of all places. (I saw after my last post). And a 120 Sata for 77$. (Which I am looking into.)
http://www.seagate.com/products/interface/sata/faq.html
1-5% Difference.. Ok just saved a bunch of money there...

I have never used a Jetway, epox, chaintech, asrocks, motherboard before and I have never sold them to anyone else before, known anyone whose had one(except epox), or had to work on one, so I don?t know how reliable they really are or how fast one will burn up or need to be replaced because of cheap conductors or something. . I haven?t looked at any of this stuff for years. I don?t know which cores are truly better, verses one another. Or which socket processor would be better. This is another reason for this post. They might be the most upgradeable... But they might be the biggest piles of pooh also. I have no exp with them...
(the exp I do have says stick with the msi, ecs , asus, abit, dfi, giga-byte. Yes, abit, msi, and giga-bytes can be iffy sometimes.)

They did go a long time with the k7 motherboard without upgrading. However, this new carrier path will generate the need to upgrade more often than what was needed before. Not to mention their child is much older, and wants to play games on it. But it won?t be dedicated to that.
So they asked for the most for what they could afford?.

(And yes there is the word afford.) The conversation started at work with, ?I?m thinking about buying (and by buying he meant buy it, paid for that day, have it on Friday) A gateway Fx400x, what do you think about this? (Which would cost 1,519.95.)? Ok, I should of said go ahead and pay for it... I said I could probably make one for fewer than 600. They said I want to see you do it for 400 (challenge)... I said ill look at the old system and see what I can do. It?s old. 400$ is less than a day?s worth of pay to both of us (overtime pay, which we get too much of.)
So can they AFFORD the extra 150$ OHH YEAH... and what is the real budget?? Around 1.5? Why are my chops are being busted over 150$ when they wanted to spend 2k. Payback for something at work.

I stand firm at a quality 939 pci-e system for 550$ that?s not OEM.
I can make a quality 754 Pci-e system for 344$ that?s not OEM/used.
But I would STRONGLY suggest to him knowing everything he wants to go with the 550$

If they want a truly cheap system they can buy a dell. I can?t beat dell on cheap.. And I have suggested it. However, they asked how upgradeable is it?? Who knows till it its too late. Again haven?t seen the inside of a dell in years.. I?m not missing pro parts.

But that is neither here nor there and hugely off the topic for this forum.

If I was building a pc for my father who is a casual internet browser, who burns a cd from time to time, I would not hesitate to buy the 754 socket, and buy the slower 2.6 cpu. Not because I?m cheap, but because he wouldn?t know, and wouldn?t every push the 2.6.

However, I feel there is a middle ground between the KIA(344$) and the Mercedes Benz(950$), and that is what I am trying to reach here.. Maybe it?s the Honda civic, Or Toyota corolla of Pc?s decent quality for a decent price.

I don?t want to suggest cheap for the sake of being cheap... I know of some REALY cheap stuff out there. If it breaks more than likely I have to fix it or replace it or RMA it. I don?t want that headache. This all seems a bit off topic.

The topic was if there was 939 sempron cpu- retail.

However the topic of FUTURE_PROOF has come up.. I don?t think you guys are taking it that same way I am when I say that. I don?t belive in furute proof, but I do belive that the 1000$ fx chip will fall to 100$ in the future, and there is no point in spending 1000$ for a chip when 146$ will get you everything you need. And in a 1-3 years when you have 100$ to spend to get the exstra 2.0g?s out of the system, buy the 55fx chip then. If the mother board will house a Fx 55 chip, buy it when it makes sence to buy it. You are saying it won?t work? Why is that? if it works now, it will work then... maybe you have to update the bios..

I can still buy new slot A althon 850?s. They are about 5 years old now. If I had bought a MB that houses an atholon 850, put an athlon 700 slot a on it. And wanted to upgrade that 700 to 850.. Why would the motherboard not work?? When they came out they cost about 700$ five years later, now they cost about 30. It?s the same chip.. So why would the motherboard not work with it???
Granted slot A is a good reference to a technology that died fast.

Socket A?s are about 4 years old, you can still buy those. And they are still very durable machines. My home server is a socket A... And it will keep living for a year or two. It?s about 3-4 years old had a 1.3 chip on it (overclocked to 1.8+). Updated the bios on the ECS motherboard and what do you know it will house a 3.0 (overclocks great) althon xp cpu that?s pretty good for a board that maxed out at 2.1 originally. The only upgrades I have made to the system are mem+, OS, updated the ROM-drives, and + HD. And that is/ will be a 5 good years out of that motherboard, because I didn?t buy the cheapest thing I could find. But I did buy it on a budget. And in a year, what motherboard socket will I probaly end up buying to replace it? Probably 939...

When I bought the motherboard I used the same logic then that I?m using now.
Buy a very flexible board, go cheap on the CPU, and update it later.

The board im suggesting houses the fx 55 chip. Ones that fit it now, are made now, and and someone will have them in the future available for sale...

Now if you are saying that the 939 is not going to be around in the future 3-5 years, then where is that 754 going to be??

Now I?m not saying furutre proof like if they came up with a IEE3000 firewire with a hexagonal plug whould the motherboard be able to use it?? Probably not without buying a daughter board to support it.

Or like USB 2.0, you are correct there are no USB 2.0 ports on the board itself. There are no USB1 ports on the board itself.. However it does have 2 usb 2.0 and 3 fire wire ports on the computer in the form of pci cards.

So you say.. ?The only way to be future proof right now is to get a dual core processor so you can use multithreaded programs when they come out. But, by the time they start coming out in droves, we'll have socket M2.?

So lets look at that sentence.. the future is dual core chips? the programs are not out yet..


Well here help me UNDERSTAND the x2/ 64-bit/ fx chips problem.. so we can get down to the nuts and bolts of this argument?


1)IF 64bit is the future, and you want to get the most for your money, and your not
worried about a budget, which do you buy now?

spend 133$ on the sempron/ athlon 64 motherboard w/ the Sempron 64bit 3.0g CPU.
spend 131$ on the sempron/athlon 64 motherboard w/ sempron 32bit 3.0g cpu
spend 222$ on the sempron/ althon/64/x2/FX MB w/ althon 64bit 3.0g CPU.

2)Which MB do you think you would have to throw away first because of limited CPU options?
Sempron/Athlon 64
Sempron/Athlon64/x2/FX

3)Two years have past, which motherboard do you think you will have to throw first because it?s the leaste upgradeable?

Sempron/Athlon 64
Sempron/Athlon64/x2/FX

That?s what I mean by in the future.
I hope that clears things up for you all a little bit..

 
I wont quote your post to spare you the scrolling... heh.

First off, his CAD and 3-D modeling apps are most likely multithreaded so dual-core would be useful. Second, if his kid WILL play some games, then he needs decent video, even if the PC wont be dedicated to games (I'd go for a Radeon X550--this is like $65 dollars or so) or he will get frustrated by the horrible framerates. Third, motherboards are cheap, so if he wants to upgrade eventually he can just buy a new board.

I'll give you a few recommendations, just for the hell of it.


Motherboard:

ECS RS480-M V1.0 Micro ATX Integrated video. Dont expect much overclocking from this, though.

or

Chaintec VNF4 Ultra <- Go for this or an ePox board if you want non-integrated video: Sapphire Radeon X550


CPU:

Athlon 64 3000+ (Venice Core)

or

Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (Manchester Dual-Core)

Harddrive:

I'd go for a Samsung Spinpoint since they are much quieter than all others. SATA or PATA doesnt really make a difference, but SATA cables are easier to work with.

Memory:

I'd get 2GB of Crucial Value ram (2x1GB), since the apps you mentioned will probably benefit from it.

Case:

I'd go for an Antec Sonata if you can find it for cheap.

Optical:

Nec ND-3540, of course.

Monitor:

LCD, this should be his personal choice.

 
Originally posted by: justly
Zap, thanks for the brownie 😀
You're welcome. In fact, if you live within driving distance I still have three left. I baked 'em myself - "tuxedo brownies" with chocolate chips in the bottom brownie half and the top half is cheesecake.

Originally posted by: aurrous
So they asked for the most for what they could afford?.

(Which would cost 1,519.95.)... I said I could probably make one for fewer than 600. They said I want to see you do it for 400 (challenge)...
Well, tell them you stand by your original "fewer than $600."

Originally posted by: aurrous
I stand firm at a quality 939 pci-e system for 550$ that?s not OEM.
There you go, problem solved.


Originally posted by: aurrous
I can?t beat dell on cheap.. And I have suggested it. However, they asked how upgradeable is it?? Who knows till it its too late. Again haven?t seen the inside of a dell in years..
It's safe to assume that any name brand system technically can be "upgraded to some degree" but generally speaking was not really designed to be upgradeable. Why? well, the companies really make their money off PC sales, not upgrade sales. They make them upgradeable as a sales pitch. Do they really want you to upgrade in a couple of years? Heck no, they want you to buy a new one.

Originally posted by: aurrous
If it breaks more than likely I have to fix it or replace it or RMA it.
Something else to consider. Do you get the feeling that this guy could become a problem? Will he always be phoning you with every little unrelated problem just because you worked on his computer? If so, then too much trouble for you. Alternately you can tell him (honestly) that since you did the work for no profit, you aren't gonna give any free support. Make sure he knows this beforehand, otherwise he'll take advantage of you.

Originally posted by: aurrous
The topic was if there was 939 sempron cpu- retail.
The answer is "no, not at this time."

Originally posted by: aurrous
buy the 55fx chip then. If the mother board will house a Fx 55 chip, buy it when it makes sence to buy it. You are saying it won?t work? Why is that? if it works now, it will work then... maybe you have to update the bios..
I'm not saying a particular CPU would stop working in a particular board. What I was getting at was that a particular CPU may become discontinued/difficult to find, and that newer CPUs based on the same socket may not work in a particular 2-3year old board.

Originally posted by: aurrous
...what is the real budget?? Around 1.5?
This you didn't tell us before, so perhaps we were a bit harsh with you. Instead, we should be harsh with this other guy for being a cheap bastard even though he has the money.

Originally posted by: aurrous
I can still buy new slot A althon 850?s. They are about 5 years old now. If I had bought a MB that houses an atholon 850, put an athlon 700 slot a on it. And wanted to upgrade that 700 to 850.. Why would the motherboard not work?? When they came out they cost about 700$ five years later, now they cost about 30. It?s the same chip.. So why would the motherboard not work with it???
Where are you finding these new slot A CPUs? The normal sources (Newegg, Fry's, etc.) don't carry stuff that old. I don't think AMD made any of those in years. Alright, alright, point taken because yes you can get an originally $700 CPU for $30 by waiting 5 years. But now what? You "upgraded" from 5 year old technology to... 4.9 year old technology.

Originally posted by: aurrous
Granted slot A is a good reference to a technology that died fast.
What are you talking about? Socket A is very long lived. Slot A died fast. Socket 423 died fast. Slot 1 was okay, going from 233MHz to 1GHz (maybe more in OEM or ES). Socket 478 was pretty good going from 1.5GHz (maybe as low as 1.3GHz) all the way to 3.4GHz. Socket A? IIRC it started in the 500MHz range and went all the way to 3.2"GHz" before it petered out.

Originally posted by: aurrous
Updated the bios on the ECS motherboard and what do you know it will house a 3.0 (overclocks great) althon xp cpu that?s pretty good for a board that maxed out at 2.1 originally.
Will you be able to give a money back guarantee that a board you sell can be BIOS updated to support future processors? Anyone here get burned by socket 478 boards that were sold with the manufacturer's claim of future Prescott support, only to find out that Intel changed the VRM specs at a later date? What about companies who leave the motherboard business and (perhaps) stop future BIOS developments, such as Shuttle (not saying they are stopping BIOS developments, but can't see them doing anything other than to fix any existing glitches)? What about motherboard companies that have completely disappeared off the face of the planet (I seem to recall "Azza," what happened to them)? The only "future CPU support" you should bank on is what the board supports at the time you bought it, plus logically future CPUs based on the same cores as existing, supported CPUs.

Originally posted by: aurrous
When I bought the motherboard I used the same logic then that I?m using now.
Buy a very flexible board, go cheap on the CPU, and update it later.
Yes, you lucked out that the ECS board can support faster chips with a BIOS update. Did you purchase the board knowing that? Hoping for, yes. Knowing, no. So, you have an old board that can be updated to a current-speed CPU. That's great! Does the board have USB 2.0? Does the board have SATA? Does the board have 7.1 sound, and "cool and quiet," and firewire, and 8+ USB port support, and RAID, and... and... and... everything else newer boards have? No it doesn't. But then, you're going to upgrade to socket 939 with all that... soon... that's great! Good for you. But wait!??!?! So the highly CPU upgradeable ECS motherboard is not going to get a CPU upgrade but instead will be replaced by a new CPU with a new motherboard?

THAT is what I keep trying to tell people.

Originally posted by: aurrous
The board im suggesting houses the fx 55 chip. Ones that fit it now, are made now, and and someone will have them in the future available for sale...
Who? Probably someone on Ebay. What if the buyer isn't a computer type person and what if in five years he is no longer associated with you and indeed doesn't know any "computer guys?" So, he takes his rig down to a normal computer shop looking for an upgrade. Guy at the shop says, "wish you had brought it in two years ago because that was the last time you could buy those CPUs new."

Originally posted by: aurrous
1)IF 64bit is the future, and you want to get the most for your money, and your not
worried about a budget, which do you buy now?

spend 133$ on the sempron/ athlon 64 motherboard w/ the Sempron 64bit 3.0g CPU.
spend 131$ on the sempron/athlon 64 motherboard w/ sempron 32bit 3.0g cpu
spend 222$ on the sempron/ althon/64/x2/FX MB w/ althon 64bit 3.0g CPU.

...I hope that clears things up for you all a little bit..
Yes, that clears up a lot. Let me re-quote the part that clears it up.

"not worried about a budget

Now that we have that information, heck it would be foolish to not go socket 939. However, some of our (myself and a few others) recommendations were based on, "I only have $XYZ budget and need a complete system." Now I feel foolish trying to teach you something that you already knew. 😱

Originally posted by: Furen
motherboards are cheap, so if he wants to upgrade eventually he can just buy a new board.
Thank you Furen. Nobody "needs" a $200 enthusiast motherboard. My ECS board cost around $70 at the time and my A64 2800+ will POST at 2.7GHz and run stable at 2.5GHz+. I'm awaiting a $55 shipped Chaintech VNF3 board that I should give me good value. Motherboards costing only a bit more are available that have all the bells/whistles such as GBe, Firewire, etc.

Back to the original topic and poster...

Aurrous, you seem to know a bit already, and have given yourself a crash course in catch-up work. Kudos on that. Now, to deal with this guy wanting a system. Tell him he has four options:

1) Insist on $400 budget. He can go away and leave you alone because you can, but don't want to.

2) If he can really drop $1500 on a system from Gateway, then do it and leave you alone.

3) You told him $600, so give him your $600 specs and explain that it is a similar system to the Gateway at a price point that meets your claims.

4) If he'd rather spend $1500 with you instead of Gateway, then he can have much MORE of a system than the Gateway, plus one designed explicitly for his needs and not by some "designer" sitting in an office spec-ing systems for price points and not by need.

Originally posted by: aurrous
My greatest concern in their "best interest" is this... Like me the person just changed Carriers, this person moved into Piping and Mechanical Engineering. Their old computer chokes badly on cad- running and rendering the 3d models, and calculation and saving the archiving the final project to DVD (external 4x). It?s not gaming, but sometimes the projects are huge, bigger than just surfing the web, or casual computer use. And yes the system does meet the MIN requirements of the programs he is using. Still slower than snot.

My computer is Intel P4 3.2g notebook with 1gig of memory, 9800 ATI all-in-wonder, 80ghd, 17? screen.
Sometimes mine takes forever to do what he wants to do.
Now having a $1500 budget and knowing his needs...

Sounds as if your system is limited by HDD speed. Here's my baseline system recommendations based on the above needs, plus $1500 budget.

CPU - x2 3800+ if within budget after all other parts, otherwise 3000+.

Video - whatever "professional OpenGL" card fits within budget, such as "FireGL" or "Quadro" lines of cards.

HDD - two 74GB WD Raptors. Nope, not in RAID. Run one as C: drive and one as D: drive, and tell the guy to use D: drive for his working data and C: drive for applications. If he needs storage space, get a cheap, large EIDE drive.

Everything else - doesn't matter, just spec whatever is decent.

You should be able to spec out something for $1500 that will blow the Gateway away for his tasks.
 
I guess nobody wanted a second brownie, LOL.

To dredge up this thread and the peripheral "future proofing" theme...

ASRock 939Dual-SATA2: First Retail ULi PCIe/AGP

Newegg $68+4 OOS

Let's see, a "value" board with a separate SATA2 controller, both AGP/PCIe, can run at 300MHz bus, has an upgrade slot for future M2 socket daughterboard and costs $70? Looks like a winner to me. :thumbsup: Now if only there were under $100 socket 939 Semprons available (then again, if only this board wasn't OOS).
 
Originally posted by: Zap
I guess nobody wanted a second brownie, LOL.

I actually read the whole thing but I didnt have anything else to add. I was going to recommend the ASRock mobo myself (instead of the chaintec) but it wasnt in stock at newegg and I've heard it cannot feed more than 1.35v to an X2 (so 2.3-2.4 is probably the highest you can clock it).

 
Originally posted by: Zap
What about motherboard companies that have completely disappeared off the face of the planet (I seem to recall "Azza," what happened to them)?

I have an Azza slot 1 440BX board. It's pretty decent, except that doesn't work with ACPI enabled. 😀

 
Back
Top