Originally posted by: fisher
i totally agree with you drag, just trying to point out it's not always as easy as just quitting your job without having some other way to support your family, which is how these companies get away with treating people the way they do. also, it's an ~industry job~ so you get guys who don't have lives or familes and are willing to work themselves to death to work for the almightly EA or whatever.
Except that if the employees are going to work 80+ hours to save the company's good name, shouldn't they be paid more than their base salary for it?Originally posted by: rh71
The higher ups (middle management) are under a lot of stress themselves even if they aren't the core producers of the product. I think there's definitely 2 sides to every story. EA should hold their name higher than the individual. Some can hack it... and obviously some can't... not that that's a terrible thing.
EA's bright and shiny new corporate trademark is "Challenge Everything." Where this applies is not exactly clear. Churning out one licensed football game after another doesn't sound like challenging much of anything to me; it sounds like a money farm.
Originally posted by: Firus
apparently there is now a Class Action Lawsuit being readied against EA in response to these blogs
Absolutely. The whole concept of a salary sucks to begin with but it's particularly brutal in IT because the nature of the work naturally demands work outside of normal hours.As a general rule, management is a bunch of idiots
Not buying the game will ultimately punish the programmers. If the sales are poor EA may fire them to further rub salt into the wound.I will not be buying MOH: PA out of protest.
Benefits/bonuses are part of motivation, I agree. If a company chooses not to partake in that to pad their bottom line, then it is their call. Likewise, it is the call of the employee to stay or not. I think there was a contract in this last case, but perhaps there should've been clauses thought through more carefully...Originally posted by: DaveSimmons
Except that if the employees are going to work 80+ hours to save the company's good name, shouldn't they be paid more than their base salary for it?Originally posted by: rh71
The higher ups (middle management) are under a lot of stress themselves even if they aren't the core producers of the product. I think there's definitely 2 sides to every story. EA should hold their name higher than the individual. Some can hack it... and obviously some can't... not that that's a terrible thing.
Originally posted by: NYHoustonman
Bleh... My dad's been working more than that the past few weeks 0.0.
Originally posted by: TekDemon
Originally posted by: NYHoustonman
Bleh... My dad's been working more than that the past few weeks 0.0.
But doesn't that mean he doesn't get to really be a dad? I mean, if you're working like 90 hours a week you just end up coming home and passing out....jeez
That said, I think I'm going to end up with 60 hour workweeks if I manage to get into medical school, but I think once you're a legitimate doctor most of that is just because they want to work more, since I believe the minimum is a fair bit less for a hospital position.
Of course, residents work between 60 and 130 hours a week...that's 5 and a half days out of your 7 day week on the high end...jeez...
On the upshot if you're doing the 60 hour end it's just like two 30 hour shifts so...not that bad.
EDIT: apparently they passed new laws limiting the maximum for doctors to 30 so doctors would stop making moronic mistakes with people's lives...thank goodness.
Originally posted by: alent1234
I checked EA's earnings on their investor relations site and they have $570 million net income on $3 billion of revenue. They also have $2.4 billion in the bank. I don't see how they can't spare a few million on new coders or higher salaries.
Originally posted by: flashbacck
Originally posted by: alent1234
I checked EA's earnings on their investor relations site and they have $570 million net income on $3 billion of revenue. They also have $2.4 billion in the bank. I don't see how they can't spare a few million on new coders or higher salaries.
They can. But why would they, if they can get away with not paying extra? Stupid EA.