• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

A 1,150 horse power chevelle??!?

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
"BTW: The LS6 is only rated at 405 HP"


That's the wrong LS6. The Chevelle came with the big block 454 LS6, factory rated at 450hp.

Do a google search for chevelle and ls6 to see some examples
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Originally posted by: ElFenix
he could be running avgas. that stuff is so volatile that if you pour some out of a vial on a warm day it will evaporate before it hits the ground.
You have that backwards. Avgas is LESS volatile than regular gas, so it evaporates SLOWER. Try it sometime, and you'll see. That's why it's hard to start race cars in cold weather....the gas is harder to ignite.
i've seen it happen. pulled straight from the fuel tank of a cessna.

AvGas does burn slower than regular gas, that's why it has higher octane.

Octane = the slower it burns the higher the octane.

A good link that expains the history of auto fuel and JET fuel.
 
Perhaps I should clarify my earlier statement: Chevy never offered a Chevelle RATED at more than 450hp. That was the LS6 454.
There was an LS7 454 that had more compression and a hotter cam, but was over the counter only.

The LS6 was truly around 500 hp. 11-1 compression with a solid lifter cam. They thumped.

The ZL1 427 was around 550 hp, but rated at less. I've seen 600hp estimates, too, but I seriously doubt that engine had 600 hp. 550 is more like it.

Really, the ZL1 was basically an aluminum version of the L88, with a bit different cam.

And yes, once again, Avgas, or high octane racing gas, burns SLOWER, and IS HARDER TO IGNITE. It is less volatile than regular auto gas.
And whoever said they saw gas taken from a Cessna and let evaporate, I'll bet you didn't see it side by side with some regular unleaded, although I fail to see how evaporation rate has anything to do with volatility. Alcohol burns MUCH more slowly than gas, yet it evaporates instantly.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb

And yes, once again, Avgas, or high octane racing gas, burns SLOWER, and IS HARDER TO IGNITE. It is less volatile than regular auto gas.
And whoever said they saw gas taken from a Cessna and let evaporate, I'll bet you didn't see it side by side with some regular unleaded, although I fail to see how evaporation rate has anything to do with volatility. Alcohol burns MUCH more slowly than gas, yet it evaporates instantly.

vol·a·tile ( P ) Pronunciation Key (vl-tl, -tl)
adj.

1. Chemistry.
  • a. Evaporating readily at normal temperatures and pressures.


and i've spilled enough 87 octane putting gas in the mower that i know this stuff went faster
 
Ok, you got me on the technicality, but the fact remains that Avgas or high octane race gas burns slower and is harder to ignite than regular unleaded car fuel, which is what we were referring to, regardless of whether we were using the word "volatile" correctly.
And I still don't believe Avgas is more volatile than regular, even by the correct definition.
 
Originally posted by: Pacfanweb
Ok, you got me on the technicality, but the fact remains that Avgas or high octane race gas burns slower and is harder to ignite than regular unleaded car fuel, which is what we were referring to, regardless of whether we were using the word "volatile" correctly.
And I still don't believe Avgas is more volatile than regular, even by the correct definition.

i dunno, usually when i spill regular quite a bit of it reaches the ground. this stuff... not a drop hit the ground
 
Back
Top