• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

9800 Pro ($170 or 6800 $270ish)?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Coming from a newb standpoint with a Dell 933 P3 running a GFFX5200 Ultra...

6800 might be the better choice seeing as though it has better support for future games and software.

On top of that it is new technology. With a Dell 2001FP (my dream) I would run the best I could afford!
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: tgenius
the 9800 pro is a decent card.. I mean.. think about it this way: When I bought my ti4200.. the 4600 was on the market.. why didn't I buy the 4600? I couldn't justify the extra $$.. same case here 😉

Based on what we've seen so far, the 4200 will probably perform fairly close to a R9800 in DoomIII, albeit without any of the "DX9" features. I would keep the 4200 until you can afford something more serious than a 9800PRO. It's not going to cut it for the next gen games IMO.

Are u serious!? A 4200 vs a 9800p in doom 3.... I think the 4200 will be 1/2 of the 9800p. Just look at the pipes and the clockspeed along with memory bandwidth... etc etc. Maybe the 4200 on low settings will equal the 9800p on high settings on 1024x768 but they definately wont be the same on the same settings dispite the dx9 vs dx8.1.
 
That was the other thing... ti4200 didn't support DX9.. I just played Farcry with this card.. there's stuff I didn't even SEE with my ti4200!. Anyways... another cool thing I forgot about is that with my 2001FP I can rotate the monitor.. and the ATI makes rotating screen ALOT easier.. I like reading webpages from this angle.
 
Originally posted by: tgenius
That was the other thing... ti4200 didn't support DX9.. I just played Farcry with this card.. there's stuff I didn't even SEE with my ti4200!. Anyways... another cool thing I forgot about is that with my 2001FP I can rotate the monitor.. and the ATI makes rotating screen ALOT easier.. I like reading webpages from this angle.

Same here. I had a 9600pro and just upgraded to a 9800pro and what a difference when playing FarCry. I can't justify spending over $200 for a video card.
 
Originally posted by: SickBeast
Originally posted by: tgenius
thank you apoppin.. 🙂 I mean.. cmon man.. that $100 you can buy a gamecube or a GBA or 2/3 of a PS2/Xbox (I have all of them so does me no good 😉) But these framerates are like a frickin pissing contest!

HAHA. Keep in mind that apoppin was just in your position and he bought a 9800XT. Rollo was basically in the same position as well, and he bought a 6800NU, so take what they say with a grain of salt.

My opinion is that the 9800PRO will become a doorstop once DoomIII and HL2 are released. It's not much faster than my 9700PRO which was originally purchased almost two years ago.

If DoomIII is what you want, don't consider anything but the newest nVidia cards. Carmack is an nVidia "fanboi" and basically designed the game engine around an nVidia graphics card.
First of all, the Doom III benchs at HardOCP indicate the 9800Pro will do fine with @10x7 HIQ No AA/AF.

Secondly, the 6800 is really just as castrated as the x800 in relation to their bigger brother.

Secondly, the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.

Notice THEIR bench mark suite scores "2664" for the 6800 and "2389" for the 9800xt - or 12% faster.

This DOES seem "connservative", but should serve as a WARNING that the 6800 is a very performance limited new card in camparison to the 6800Gt (for only a few bucks more).

If you disagree with eVGA's benchmark comparison please direct flames to THEM. 😛

:roll:
 
Originally posted by: tgenius
the 9800 pro is a decent card.. I mean.. think about it this way: When I bought my ti4200.. the 4600 was on the market.. why didn't I buy the 4600? I couldn't justify the extra $$.. same case here 😉

That's a LOT different. Now you're talking about cards with entirely different core features in the case of the nV40s and HUGE differences in fillrate and memory bandwidth for the X800s.
 
Secondly, the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.

Are you sure eVGA makes nVidia reference model cards Apoppin? I didn't know that. (because I have a nVidia reference model, not eVGA?)

As far as the rest of it goes, enough people have pointed out that you're nuts about the 12% that I'm not going to bother.

Since you've pretty much been a piss ant about it and enraged many people with your 3 year old "Look at the website marketing claim" repeated ad infinitum, I will say I take some pleasure in knowing you have a lowly 9800xt entering the era of Far Cry, Doom 3, and HL2.
😉
 
Originally posted by: Rollo
Secondly, the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.

Are you sure eVGA makes nVidia reference model cards Apoppin? I didn't know that. (because I have a nVidia reference model, not eVGA?)

As far as the rest of it goes, enough people have pointed out that you're nuts about the 12% that I'm not going to bother.

Since you've pretty much been a piss ant about it and enraged many people with your 3 year old "Look at the website marketing claim" repeated ad infinitum, I will say I take some pleasure in knowing you have a lowly 9800Pro entering the era of Far Cry, Doom 3, and HL2.
😉
i'm sorry, i thought you had an eVGA card. 😱

and it's a lowly 9800xt . . . which will do fine with Doom III according the the HardOCP benchs of the demo at resolutions i consider acceptable; i.e 10x7 HiQ 2AA/4AF . . .

. . . if i was gonna blow $300, i'd do my research a little more thoroughly to spend just a few bucks more instead of getting a crippled "new" next-gen GPU. 😛

:roll:
 
Secondly, the 6800 is really just as castrated as the x800 in relation to their bigger brother.

Secondly, the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.
-----------------

How can you have two secondlys?


Oh I know both these cards play second fiddle to the GT😉 OP don't waste your money on either. We've waited this long for this vapor ware...two more weeks is'nt going to kill us... by then heavy stock arrives and retailers compete with each other will get you a $300 GT>
 
Originally posted by: Zebo
Secondly, the 6800 is really just as castrated as the x800 in relation to their bigger brother.

Secondly, , the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.
-----------------

How can you have two Secondly, ?


Oh I know both these cards play second fiddle to the GT😉 OP don't waste your money on either. We've waited this long for this vapor ware...two more weeks is'nt going to kill us... by then heavy stock arrives and retailers compete with each other will get you a $300 GT>
now we have 4 "Secondly, " 😉

thanks for pointing this out. 😛

:roll:

i already got called on my mistake in the 2nd Secondly, . . . 😱

edit: up to 5, not counting the 2nd . . .
 
This game (Doom 3) was played on a GF4mx, and played fine.
A GF3 (or GF2, for that matter) will therefore also play Doom 3 fine.
The 9800P is how many orders of magnitude faster than a GF4mx?

All you guys who claim that that Doom3 will give a 9800P "problems" need to move out of your parents basements, turn off the Star Trek, and get lives.
 
If the forum software replaced "ATi" with "Kerry" and "nVidia" with "Bush", I honestly couldn't tell the difference between this forum and P&N most times 😀
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Rollo
Secondly, the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.

Are you sure eVGA makes nVidia reference model cards Apoppin? I didn't know that. (because I have a nVidia reference model, not eVGA?)

As far as the rest of it goes, enough people have pointed out that you're nuts about the 12% that I'm not going to bother.

Since you've pretty much been a piss ant about it and enraged many people with your 3 year old "Look at the website marketing claim" repeated ad infinitum, I will say I take some pleasure in knowing you have a lowly 9800Pro entering the era of Far Cry, Doom 3, and HL2.
😉
i'm sorry, i thought you had an eVGA card. 😱

and it's a lowly 9800xt . . . which will do fine with Doom III according the the HardOCP benchs of the demo at resolutions i consider acceptable; i.e 10x7 HiQ 2AA/4AF . . .

. . . if i was gonna blow $300, i'd do my research a little more thoroughly to spend just a few bucks more instead of getting a crippled "new" next-gen GPU. 😛

:roll:

1. I emailed eVGA's marketing department. We'll see what they meant by that quote you misquote endlessly.
2. You have no idea what I spent on my 6800NU.
3. I can tell you this much, if it's framerates are anywhere near what I saw for the 9800XT, I'll have a GT or Ultra before I continue in the game. 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Rollo
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Rollo
Secondly, the maker of Rollo's card - eVGA - seems to think the 6800standard is only (at least a "full") +12% "overall" than the 9800xt.

Are you sure eVGA makes nVidia reference model cards Apoppin? I didn't know that. (because I have a nVidia reference model, not eVGA?)

As far as the rest of it goes, enough people have pointed out that you're nuts about the 12% that I'm not going to bother.

Since you've pretty much been a piss ant about it and enraged many people with your 3 year old "Look at the website marketing claim" repeated ad infinitum, I will say I take some pleasure in knowing you have a lowly 9800Pro entering the era of Far Cry, Doom 3, and HL2.
😉
i'm sorry, i thought you had an eVGA card. 😱

and it's a lowly 9800xt . . . which will do fine with Doom III according the the HardOCP benchs of the demo at resolutions i consider acceptable; i.e 10x7 HiQ 2AA/4AF . . .

. . . if i was gonna blow $300, i'd do my research a little more thoroughly to spend just a few bucks more instead of getting a crippled "new" next-gen GPU. 😛

:roll:

1. I emailed eVGA's marketing department. We'll see what they meant by that quote you misquote endlessly.
2. You have no idea what I spent on my 6800NU.
3. I can tell you this much, if it's framerates are anywhere near what I saw for the 9800XT, I'll have a GT or Ultra before I continue in the game. 🙂
re: #1: Awesome . . . please post eVGA's response!

🙂
 
thanks selfbuilt.. I can deff see the difference with the 9800 pro.. it's a step above my ti4200, and the shadows in farcry that I wasn't seeing before.. well that speaks volumes in itself 🙂
 
Originally posted by: Matthias99
Originally posted by: Oreo
You don't seem to know how to measure the speed of a graphicscard. The way to do it is to eliminate all other bottlenecks so it is only the graphicscards themselves that are being tested. You can do this by running with newer games at high resolution and/or AA/AF.

Of course, you cherry-picked the results where the 6800 has a big edge over the 9800Pro. Look, I can do the same the other way:

Far Cry 1600x1200 4xAA/8xAF:
9800Pro: ~19fps (if 10% slower than 9800XT)
6800: ~18fps

UT2K4 1280x1024 4xAA/8xAF:
9800Pro: ~29fps
6800: ~28fps

Does that mean the 6800 is slower than the 9800Pro?

When you turn on AA and AF, the 6800 slows down a *lot*. And Halo is an X-Box port (all of which generally run better on NVIDIA), and *ALL* ATI cards have performance issues with JK:JA (you may have also noticed the vanilla 6800 beating the X800XT -- certainly some sort of game or driver issue there).

By your logic you could compare two different CPUs, a P4 1.5GHz and a P4 3GHz with the same graphicscard and come to the conclusion that the P4 3GHz wasn't faster at all. You would come to that conclusion IF you had a bottleneck in the graphicscard, if you were running the two systems with say a GF3. As I've shown you the 6800 (the actual card itself not comparing the rest of the system) is atleast 50% than a 9800 Pro. That DOES NOT mean that the 6800 will always be 50% faster than the 9800 Pro, of course not, but when "the sh!t hits the fan" it will (when you are graphicscard limited). What is that you don't understand about this?

It's not at least 50% faster. It's at most ~50% faster, generally at settings that make no sense to run a 9800Pro at (why buy an ATI card and run it without AA/AF, which is their biggest performance advantage?) It's more like a 15-30% performance difference if you look at a wider variety of tests and settings.

IMHO, the 6800 is the worst choice of price/performance right now (at least at $300). The 6800GT for $400 offers significantly better performance across the board, and the 9800Pro at $200 is a third cheaper and doesn't lose all that much performance in most games.

Here's a SUMMARY of some 6800 vs 9800XT benchs:
the "+" indicates the 6800standard's advantage over the 9800XT)

aquamark 3 6880 +19%

3Dmark03 +4%

Far Cry

10x7 +8%
2aa/4af +36%
4aa/8af +55%

16x12 -11%
2aa/4af -11%
4aa/8af +7%


UT2004
10x7 +2%
2aa/4af -12%
4aa/8af -35%

16x12 +36%
2aa/4af +32%
4aa/8af +29%


Halo

10x7 +24%
2aa/4af +44%


TR AoD)

10x7 +17%
2aa/4af +1%
4aa/8af -1%


16x12 -13%
w/2aa/4af +10%
w/4aa/8af +11%

Sure doesn't look like the 6800 is more than 20% FASTER overall. . . . NOwhere is it 50% faster (except in the dreams of the owners of this "crippled" 'high-end' card). 😛

:roll:

i BET eVGA confirms their +12% as a "conservative" real-world comparison with the 9800XT . . . they could probably have said +20% and it'd be "close" :roll:
 
Originally posted by: FluxCap
How much faster is the 6800GT than the 6800Standard from what you have seen apoppin?
again, IMO - everything i post with out a direct link is - the "GT" is ~20-30% faster than the Standard 6800 (overall).

How much faster do you think it is?
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: FluxCap
How much faster is the 6800GT than the 6800Standard from what you have seen apoppin?
again, IMO - everything i post with out a direct link is - the "GT" is ~20-30% faster than the Standard 6800 (overall).

How much faster do you think it is?

About the same.
 
Originally posted by: FluxCap
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: FluxCap
How much faster is the 6800GT than the 6800Standard from what you have seen apoppin?
again, IMO - everything i post with out a direct link is - the "GT" is ~20-30% faster than the Standard 6800 (overall).

How much faster do you think it is?

About the same.
so . . . do you also agree that the 6800 isn't that much of a step up over the 9800XT (considering the performance of the "GT" for a few bucks more)?
 
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: FluxCap
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: FluxCap
How much faster is the 6800GT than the 6800Standard from what you have seen apoppin?
again, IMO - everything i post with out a direct link is - the "GT" is ~20-30% faster than the Standard 6800 (overall).

How much faster do you think it is?

About the same.
so . . . do you also agree that the 6800 isn't that much of a step up over the 9800XT (considering the performance of the "GT" for a few bucks more)?

I am not sure I really have an opinion since I went with the GT. I would have to look at more game specific benchmarks before I could answer that.
 
Back
Top