Originally posted by: MacBaine
This thread is pretty lame (pic)
No it isn't.Originally posted by: RyanSengara
broken link
Originally posted by: RyanSengara
broken link
You might want to update your copyright to 2003. Otherwise anyone could steal the phrase no thanks.Originally posted by: Colt45
no thanks
Originally posted by: Deslocke
You might want to update your copyright to 2003. Otherwise anyone could steal the phrase no thanks.Originally posted by: Colt45
no thanks
Originally posted by: joohang
Originally posted by: RyanSengara
broken link
Probably the ad blocker in action.
I think it is safe to say she is not 200 pounds.Originally posted by: MichaelD
Hey guys, I saw this picture that measures exactly .75 inches, square. The pic is of some chick's face. She looks pretty, but may actually be a 200-pound heffer. What do you think?
![]()
But Kenji, you get an "E for Effort!!"
Originally posted by: Deslocke
I think it is safe to say she is not 200 pounds.Originally posted by: MichaelD
Hey guys, I saw this picture that measures exactly .75 inches, square. The pic is of some chick's face. She looks pretty, but may actually be a 200-pound heffer. What do you think?
![]()
But Kenji, you get an "E for Effort!!"
Originally posted by: Deslocke
You might want to update your copyright to 2003. Otherwise anyone could steal the phrase no thanks.Originally posted by: Colt45
no thanks
No, but I will try really hard ..Originally posted by: MichaelD
Well, I tend to agree w/you. Judging by her face, she's 19 years old, 5'2" and 98 pounds soaking wet. But, if you think really hard, I'm sure you can understand the sarcasm in my post, yes?![]()
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
No, actually, she's not.
And mineOriginally posted by: Yield
Originally posted by: ffmcobalt
No, actually, she's not.
ok, your opinion.. punk.
