9600GT with Crysis at very high with AA

[MustangSVT]

I have a feeling he wont be coming back with a solid proof.

9600gt simply cant do that.

 

[yh125d]

Originally posted by: MustangSVT
I have a feeling he wont be coming back with a solid proof.

9600gt simply cant do that.

At a res so low where GPU is almost a non-factor? He might be embellishing a bit, but I really don't think it's that far fetched. I bet his average is 20-25

 

[Soulkeeper]

that's 1995 15" super awesome monitor resolution 🙂

 

[toyota]

Originally posted by: yh125d

Originally posted by: MustangSVT
I have a feeling he wont be coming back with a solid proof.

9600gt simply cant do that.

At a res so low where GPU is almost a non-factor? He might be embellishing a bit, but I really don't think it's that far fetched. I bet his average is 20-25

the gpu is still extremely important at 1024x768.

 

[error8]

He probably doesn't have AA at 16X as he says. He's forcing it from Nvidia's control panel, but it doesn't work in game.

Even so, I still don't see him running the game with no problems at very high at 1024X768.

 

[AzN]

Originally posted by: toyota

Originally posted by: yh125d

Originally posted by: MustangSVT
I have a feeling he wont be coming back with a solid proof.

9600gt simply cant do that.

At a res so low where GPU is almost a non-factor? He might be embellishing a bit, but I really don't think it's that far fetched. I bet his average is 20-25

the gpu is still extremely important at 1024x768.

That would depend on the game but Crysis on very high is just demanding even @ 1024x768 and no AA and with 16QAA a GTX 280 will not be able to do that let alone a 9600gt.

 

[rogue1979]

Originally posted by: toyota
BULLSHIT!



system in sig. I just ran the Crysis benchmark on Very High and x16Q AA at 1024x768 which is what you are claiming and got an average of 27.55 fps. my cpu is slightly better and my overclocked gtx260 is almost 3 times as strong as a 9600gt. please stop with your delusions.

My son has a E6600 @ 3.3GHz and was running Crysis with an overclocked 9600GT (775/1875/2050). 1152 x 864 with 2X AA and 8X AF he was averaging 30-35 fps. He had all details on high except shadows and water detail set at medium.

Now he's using an 8800GT 512MB and at 1280 x 1024 with 2X AA and 8X AF he averages 35-40 fps at the same details.

 

[Hello Moto]

Sorry about the late reply XD I went to out with my mates, massive walk, I COULD OF SWORN I SAW A COMET OR SOMETHING, it was a quick flash of oranges sparks 😛 gone in just 1 second

anywayz, i just downloaded the tool, took me a few minutes to work out how it worked though XD but here

1/20/2009 3:10:01 AM - Vista
Beginning Run #1 on Map-island, Demo-benchmark_gpu
DX10 1024x768, AA=16xQ, Vsync=Disabled, 32 bit test, FullScreen
Demo Loops=3, Time Of Day= 9
Global Game Quality: VeryHigh
==============================================================
TimeDemo Play Started , (Total Frames: 2000, Recorded Time: 111.86s)
!TimeDemo Run 0 Finished
Play Time: 106.66s, Average FPS: 18.75
Min FPS: 11.41 at frame 149, Max FPS: 26.88 at frame 1764
Average Tri/Sec: -13023241, Tri/Frame: -694558
Recorded/Played Tris ratio: -1.32


Completed All Tests

<><><><><><><><><><><><><>>--SUMMARY--<<><><><><><><><><><><><><>

Guess i got my framerates wrong, i thought it would be around the 20's :S
18.75fps is still good enough for me, so im happy with it.

btw, i got an 9600GT Black Pearl Edition, i didnt add the 'black pearl edition' because i thought it was just nothing important, but just incase, here it is. Now, if you dont mind, im goin to play crysis 😀

ps: yes it does say AM, its 3:30AM here in australia 😛

 

[Darklife]

Well that killed the all the commotion didn't it? 😛

 

[AzN]

I benchmarked Crysis with my 8800gts at the same resolution very high. I get 33.41fps. I tried forcing AA through control panel and this does not work.

So what you are really doing is running it at 1024x768 with no AA. 18.75fps seems about right with no AA on 9600gt.

 

[toyota]

Originally posted by: Azn
I benchmarked Crysis with my 8800gts at the same resolution very high. I get 33.41fps. I tried forcing AA through control panel and this does not work.

So what you are really doing is running it at 1024x768 with no AA. 18.75fps seems about right with no AA on 9600gt.

well it shows 16Q AA in his copy and paste from the benchmark. 18 fps is not really playable but still much better than I would have thought.

 

[Hello Moto]

Yea, it does get annoying at times, but still playable, i might drop it down a bit. Theres some weird graphical glitches in the game at times, its like a group grey traingles for a few seconds then disappears. Its playable, but i do sense a slight delay, very slighty though, but imagine the ice levels, jeez, that would screw up my comp XD Performance over quality i say 😛

 

[dadach]

Originally posted by: toyota
BULLSHIT!



system in sig. I just ran the Crysis benchmark on Very High and x16Q AA at 1024x768 which is what you are claiming and got an average of 27.55 fps. my cpu is slightly better and my overclocked gtx260 is almost 3 times as strong as a 9600gt. please stop with your delusions.

lol...just accept the fact that at that resolution, it doesnt really matter if one has 9600GT or 260GTX 😛

or it matters very little 😉

 

[AzN]

Originally posted by: toyota

Originally posted by: Azn
I benchmarked Crysis with my 8800gts at the same resolution very high. I get 33.41fps. I tried forcing AA through control panel and this does not work.

So what you are really doing is running it at 1024x768 with no AA. 18.75fps seems about right with no AA on 9600gt.

well it shows 16Q AA in his copy and paste from the benchmark. 18 fps is not really playable but still much better than I would have thought.

Obviously a benchmarking utility that probably didn't add 16QAA just like Nvidia control panel.

A 9600gt has 64SP. It's barely gets by for high settings at 1280x1024 or below let alone very high settings. At 16QAA it takes tremendous amount of constraint on bandwidth and ROP. I tried the benchmark on my 8800gts @ 16Q and it pulled 23-24fps. That's with the overclock settings on my sig. A 9600gt just can't do that with 16QAA.

My old overclocked 8800gs was faster than 9600gt far as crysis is concerned and that card pulled 17.37fps at very high @ 1440x900 resolution with no AA. When it wasn't overclocked it pulled 14.58fps

 

[Hello Moto]

Believe what you want, i have been on this topic for over a couple of days now (made another thread on another site), i took screenshots, checked my settings, did this benchmark thing. Whatevers, iv said this ages ago, I dont care what you believe, all i know is that i can play crysis on very high with AA on the maps that doesnt require much use of the video card, unlike those ice missions >..>

But im happy with my stuff, ill prob have to turn it down though, it does drop framerates now and then....always when i need fast framerates most >..> Ill prob make it all very high and turn down AA a bit (not to much though, i still want it to look good 😛). Done and done, you guys can discuss it, blah blah blah XD I wont have any part of it though, i was just asking a simple question and it got answered XD

Thanks for the guys who helped me out 😀

 

[AzN]

http://forums.steampowered.com...ca2f1e&t=787153&page=2

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1033613576

That must be you and guess what no one believes you on those sites including here. Anyone who played crysis knows enough that even GTX 280 can't play crysis at very high at modest resolutions and that's with no AA. 1024x768 16QAA would be like running @ 1920x1200 resolution at very high. A 9600gt can't even pull that many frames @ high settings let alone very high at those settings.

You obviously do not have AA on. 18.75fps is what a 9600gt would get at very high at that resolution.

 

[Darklife]

Uhh I have a GTX 280 and I played just fine on 1680x1050 at very high. 😀

 

[Quizard]

I believe u motto, cause I got similar FPS on a 9600 GSO but lower AA

 

[dguy6789]

Originally posted by: Azn
http://forums.steampowered.com...ca2f1e&t=787153&page=2

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1033613576

That must be you and guess what no one believes you on those sites including here. Anyone who played crysis knows enough that even GTX 280 can't play crysis at very high at modest resolutions and that's with no AA. 1024x768 16QAA would be like running @ 1920x1200 resolution at very high. A 9600gt can't even pull that many frames @ high settings let alone very high at those settings.

You obviously do not have AA on. 18.75fps is what a 9600gt would get at very high at that resolution.

Complete and utter BS. My system can play Crysis at 1680x1050 at very high settings across the board at well over 30fps in just about every location including ice levels.

 

[AzN]

Originally posted by: dguy6789

Originally posted by: Azn
http://forums.steampowered.com...ca2f1e&t=787153&page=2

http://www.hardforum.com/showthread.php?p=1033613576

That must be you and guess what no one believes you on those sites including here. Anyone who played crysis knows enough that even GTX 280 can't play crysis at very high at modest resolutions and that's with no AA. 1024x768 16QAA would be like running @ 1920x1200 resolution at very high. A 9600gt can't even pull that many frames @ high settings let alone very high at those settings.

You obviously do not have AA on. 18.75fps is what a 9600gt would get at very high at that resolution.

Complete and utter BS. My system can play Crysis at 1680x1050 at very high settings across the board at well over 30fps in just about every location including ice levels.

http://www.tomshardware.com/re...d-4870-x2,2073-18.html

Yes well under 30fps for your 4870. Playable is up to the eye of the beholder obviously. :roll:

 

[Darklife]

I think you're forgetting about Crysis' huge motion blur. Even though I probably average something around 30 fps the game feels smooth like butter thanks to it.

 

[AzN]

Originally posted by: Darklife
I think you're forgetting about Crysis' huge motion blur. Even though I probably average something around 30 fps the game feels smooth like butter thanks to it.

When the benchmarks says it only pull 25fps for 4870. Obviously he's not getting everything over 30fps unless he tweaked the ini file or running dx9 settings.

I understand the motion blur. I don't doubt GTX 280 can do 1680x1050 if you maybe overclock to get 30fps average. If it seems playable to you all power to you.