9/11 Was A Hoax

[DanFungus]

Originally posted by: CadetLee

Originally posted by: GRagland
I never said i was anti-war or thought this article was true, but i would like to say that the US is certainly capable of such a thing as this. They have done similar things in the past, not nearly as horrific, but they have killed their own people to fake an enemy attack with the aim of starting a war.

Examples? 5,000 people is alot...and who are they going to find who would perform a suicide attack!?

well, if you pay him enough...😛

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: GRagland
I never said i was anti-war or thought this article was true, but i would like to say that the US is certainly capable of such a thing as this. They have done similar things in the past, not nearly as horrific, but they have killed their own people to fake an enemy attack with the aim of starting a war.

Please just go away. Take your anti-American al-queada bullsh!t and just leave. Everything in your so-called article has been disproven many times over.

just STFU, it isn't worth anymore than that.

 

[guyver01]

My friend died on the 103rd floor of the 2nd tower. He was a technician with eSpeed (Cantor Fitzgerald).

Tell his two young daughters, who are now growing up without their father, that this was a HOAX :|

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Originally posted by: GRagland
I never said i was anti-war or thought this article was true, but i would like to say that the US is certainly capable of such a thing as this. They have done similar things in the past, not nearly as horrific, but they have killed their own people to fake an enemy attack with the aim of starting a war.

Demonstrably false.

Notice the collapse of the towers started from the site of impact and then went downward, not from some demolition at the base where the "hundred day fire" was supposed to be. Demolition of the towers would have caused the buildings to collapse from the base, which they clearly did not. The rest is BS too.

 

[Jmman]

Yeah, and we never landed on the moon and Elvis is still alive.....give me a freakin break, and lay off the crack....:|

 

[Zim Hosein]

:disgust:

:|

 

[rgwalt]

Originally posted by: GRagland
I never said i was anti-war or thought this article was true, but i would like to say that the US is certainly capable of such a thing as this. They have done similar things in the past, not nearly as horrific, but they have killed their own people to fake an enemy attack with the aim of starting a war.

What? When?

Ryan

 

[NightTrain]

Ole John Kaminski has alot of this stuff already figured out:

"But the real reason I can't identify with Hitler is that I can see from his philosophical descendants that he was pure, insane evil. And who are those philosophical descendants? Well, they are the Bush family, tied into the Hitler legacy through the second Bush president's forebears, Herbert Walker and Prescott Bush, who both made millions off their backing of German businesses during World War II. This is no fiction. Do a Google search. It's easy to find. These are Hitler's real philosophical descendants: the pro-war, Zionist Christian Republican establishment."

"But just because I revile Hitler doesn't mean I believe the fictions the Jewish dominated media have spun about the Holocaust. I have been driven irrevocably into the category of Holocaust denier (a 1947 AP story said 875,000 Jews were killed in Germany during WW II) simply because of the way the Jewish community has trumpeted its martyrdom for financial gain, how the Jewish community has destroyed freedom of speech in a dozen European countries by making it a crime to talk about the events that led up to World War II."

 

[GRagland]

lol, cool out people, its not my article. there's no point in 50 people replying just to say how stupid it is. just dont respond if you dont have something good to say, like why the article could not be true, or why you think it is...

 

[Zim Hosein]

Originally posted by: GRagland
lol, cool out people, its not my article. there's no point in 50 people replying just to say how stupid it is. just dont respond if you dont have something good to say, like why the article could not be true, or why you think it is...

So basically your post is pointless correct GRagland? If so, please STFU! Thank you.

 

[Kevin]

I find it ironic how the writer complains about missing information yet his article has a lot of misinformation...

 

[etech]

Originally posted by: GRagland
lol, cool out people, its not my article. there's no point in 50 people replying just to say how stupid it is. just dont respond if you dont have something good to say, like why the article could not be true, or why you think it is...

It's crap, that's all it is, there is nothing here to discuss.


ah heck off.

 

[PoPPeR]

the article intrigued me so I read it. I don't believe it because it would have had to have been a miracle to pull something like that off, and too many mouths would have to have been kept shut, but interesting article notherless. The government has proved many times it cannot be trusted, however not to this extent in my opinion 🙂 I tried to give you a more mature response then what you've been recieving.

 

[NightTrain]

The twin towers could not have collapsed as a result of burning jet fuel. Most of that fuel was consumed on impact. In the south tower, most of the fuel was spilled outside the building. Heat caused by burning jet fuel does not reach temperatures needed to melt steel.

"just dont respond if you dont have something good to say, like why the article could not be true, or why you think it is..."

Ok then:

Agence France Presse
Thursday September 13, 5:45 AM

Fire, not impact, caused collapse of towers: experts

"Engineers and architects said the huge amounts of jet fuel caused an inferno with temperatures as high as 1,000 degrees Celsius (2,000
Fahrenheit), melting the supporting steel and eventually causing the 110-story towers to implode."

Lemme guess, those experts are all part of the worldwide Jewish conspiracy too?

 

[Zim Hosein]

Originally posted by: PoPPeR
the article intrigued me so I read it. I don't believe it because it would have had to have been a miracle to pull something like that off, and too many mouths would have to have been kept shut, but interesting article notherless. The government has proved many times it cannot be trusted, however not to this extent in my opinion 🙂 I tried to give you a more mature response then what you've been recieving.

GRagland isn't worth the effort IMHO.

 

[halik]

hmm,
its soo long...but i do believe the plane in pensylvania was shot down....it would make sense to want to cover it up
And i've been wondering about the pentagon crash as well. 3000 people/ millions of damage is litte too high to be intentional... they coul've gotten the fear effect lot easier with less casualities/damage

 

[conjur]

Originally posted by: GRagland
Planes that lose contact with control towers are usually intercepted by
fighter jets inside of ten minutes, as the incident with the golfer's plane
a few months earlier so clearly demonstrated. Yet on 9/11, the jetliners
that struck New York were allowed to proceed unmolested for more than a
half-hour, and the plane that supposedly crashed in Washington was not
intercepted for more than an hour and forty minutes after it was widely
known that four planes had been hijacked.

BS...'a few months earlier'? Payne Stewart's plane crash was two YEARS before 9/11. And the F-16s that intercepted the plane were not even armed. link

. The twin towers could not have collapsed as a result of burning jet fuel.
Most of that fuel was consumed on impact. In the south tower, most of the
fuel was spilled outside the building. Heat caused by burning jet fuel does
not reach temperatures needed to melt steel. What does stand out as
particularly suspicious and still unexplained is that fires raged out of
control beneath THREE of the collapsed towers for ONE HUNDRED DAYS, clearly
indicating the presence of some kind of substance utilized in the demolition
of the structures.

The Twin Towers did not fall because of plane impacts or fires. Most likely
explosives were placed on structural supports in the towers (as was done in
Oklahoma City), and these controlled implosions snuffed out the lives of
three thousand people.

Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation

Much like the invasion of Iraq, the anthrax attacks were designed to
deflect attention from unanswered 9/11 questions in the patriotic
pandemonium that followed the tragedy. In addition to making large amounts
of money for the president's father and his friends from the hasty sale of
inefficient drugs to a panicked populace, the investigation into these
killings was abruptly halted when the trail of evidence led straight to the
government's door, and has not been reopened. The anthrax attacks also amped
up the climate of fear and deflected attention from the passage of the
government's repressive Patriot Act.

Wow...conspiracy theorists unite!

The invasion of Afghanistan was presented as an attempt to pursue the
alleged perpetrators of 9/11, yet it had been discussed for years prior to
the tragedy and actually planned in the months before the attacks on New
York and Washington. Statements by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the
Republican-written Project for a New American Century have stressed that
America needed a formidable enemy to accomplish its aggressive geopolitical
aims. The supposed enemy we attacked in Afghanistan was a diverse group of
men from all over the world who were initially recruited, encouraged and
supported by the American CIA.

The Taliban regime was coming under increasing fire and the UN was well aware of the atrocities being committed there. Wouldn't surprise me if something was being planned.

The hole in the Pentagon was not made by a jumbo jet. Damage to the
building was simply not consistent with the size of the hole nor the absence
of debris. At the supposed point of impact, a whole bank of windows remained
unbroken and there were no marks on the lawn. No airplane debris (except
what was planted on the lawn) nor remains of passengers were ever found.

Barbara Olson, wife of U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson was on that flight.
link

. The plane in Pennsylvania was shot down and broke apart in midair. No
other explanation can account for the wreckage, which was spread over a
six-mile area, or the eyewitness accounts that describe debris falling from
the sky.

. Cellphone calls cannot be made from airliners in flight that are not close
to the ground. As research by Professor A. K. Dewdney has shown, the
emotional conversations between hijacked passengers and others would not
have been possible under conditions that existed at that moment. These calls
were cynical fabrications, exploiting the distraught emotions of those who
lost loved ones.

Uhh...yeah...that's why I've used my phone and received pages on my pager.

Why was the debris from the collapsed Twin Towers removed from the site
with no forensic examination? Why was almost all of it sold to scrap
merchants and shipped abroad where it would not be available for scientific
examination?

It was all sent to Fresh Kills, Staten Island. Now, the mafia got ahold of some of the debris and had it rerouted for their economic gain.

Why do all the major U.S. media continue to act as if none of these
questions is legitimate or relevant?

Because it's all BS!