8GB VRAM not enough (and 10 / 12)

Page 125 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

BFG10K

Lifer
Aug 14, 2000
22,709
3,002
126
8GB
Horizon Forbidden West 3060 is faster than the 2080 Super despite the former usually competing with the 2070. Also 3060 has a better 1% low than 4060 and 4060Ti 8GB.
pFJi8XrGZfYuvhvk4952je-970-80.png.webp
Resident Evil Village 3060TI/3070 tanks at 4K and is slower than the 3060/6700XT when ray tracing:
RE.jpg
Company Of Heroes 3060 has a higher minimum than the 3070TI:
CH.jpg

10GB / 12GB

Reasons why still shipping 8GB since 2014 isn't NV's fault.
  1. It's the player's fault.
  2. It's the reviewer's fault.
  3. It's the developer's fault.
  4. It's AMD's fault.
  5. It's the game's fault.
  6. It's the driver's fault.
  7. It's a system configuration issue.
  8. Wrong settings were tested.
  9. Wrong area was tested.
  10. Wrong games were tested.
  11. 4K is irrelevant.
  12. Texture quality is irrelevant as long as it matches a console's.
  13. Detail levels are irrelevant as long as they match a console's.
  14. There's no reason a game should use more than 8GB, because a random forum user said so.
  15. It's completely acceptable for the more expensive 3070/3070TI/3080 to turn down settings while the cheaper 3060/6700XT has no issue.
  16. It's an anomaly.
  17. It's a console port.
  18. It's a conspiracy against NV.
  19. 8GB cards aren't meant for 4K / 1440p / 1080p / 720p gaming.
  20. It's completely acceptable to disable ray tracing on NV while AMD has no issue.
  21. Polls, hardware market share, and game title count are evidence 8GB is enough, but are totally ignored when they don't suit the ray tracing agenda.
According to some people here, 8GB is neeeevaaaaah NV's fault and objective evidence "doesn't count" because of reasons(tm). If you have others please let me know and I'll add them to the list. Cheers!
 
Last edited:

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,681
31,538
146
16 Series is 5 years old at this point.
Forced obsolescence is forced. Worst part is it'll work. They have done it, they have an Apple style cult.

Any self respecting GTX owner would buy Intel or AMD next time - but the power of the green kool aid could not be undone. They have gotten the 🖕from Nv on upscaling and frame generation, now they can add Nvidia sponsored games to the list? The devoted must buy a new RTX card or be ex communicated. 👻
 

jpiniero

Lifer
Oct 1, 2010
16,493
6,988
136
Forced obsolescence is forced. Worst part is it'll work. They have done it, they have an Apple style cult.

The consoles have it, that's why. I remember when people complained about a console port being AVX only long after the PS4/XBO had been released.
 

DAPUNISHER

Super Moderator CPU Forum Mod and Elite Member
Super Moderator
Aug 22, 2001
31,681
31,538
146
The consoles have it, that's why. I remember when people complained about a console port being AVX only long after the PS4/XBO had been released.
False equivalence.
 

marees

Golden Member
Apr 28, 2024
1,252
1,804
96
Hub Voters about 8gb price
a309b22454c1da97e340eb9d6eae6568.png
Only b580 available within that max budget ($250) with > 8gb

The 3060, 6750 xt & 6800 will soon go out of stock

The 7700xt has occasionally sold for $350

So from AMD side you need atleast $350
As of today from Nvidia side atleast $450
 

poke01

Diamond Member
Mar 8, 2022
3,754
5,084
106
Ouch, it's not just 8GB. Now 10GB isn't enough either. 12GB RX 6700 XT beating the RTX 3080 by nearly 90% with RT on in a game I want to play. Very happy I went AMD.

By the looks of it in 2 years 12 GB won’t be enough and then in 4 years 16GB won’t be enough. PS6 generation will probably will 24GB VRAM.

Perfectly good GPUs wasted by low VRAM.
 

SteveGrabowski

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2014
8,738
7,350
136
By the looks of it in 2 years 12 GB won’t be enough and then in 4 years 16GB won’t be enough. PS6 generation will probably will 24GB VRAM.

Perfectly good GPUs wasted by low VRAM.
Thankfully my 6700 XT looks like it was given the correct amount of VRAM. Still aging pretty decently nearly four years later. I figure I'm going to have to ride it into the ground before finding another card worth buying with the way Trump's tariffs are going to skullf--k gamers.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,308
136
www.teamjuchems.com
By the looks of it in 2 years 12 GB won’t be enough and then in 4 years 16GB won’t be enough. PS6 generation will probably will 24GB VRAM.

Perfectly good GPUs wasted by low VRAM.
10 was always weird, and 20 is weird now. 10GB saving grace was likely the 10GB fast pool on the Series X but since Xbox games have to support the series S, I guess they might just tune for that and call it a day.

Just saying if there isn’t a big enough install base, no one will tune a profile to it. 8, 12, 16. Those must be the targets. And likely a “low” that’s a catch all for below that. 12 should last for a lot longer due to the massive and still growing install base.
 

SolidQ

Golden Member
Jul 13, 2023
1,451
2,363
106
By the looks of it in 2 years 12 GB won’t be enough and then in 4 years 16GB won’t be enough. PS6 generation will probably will 24GB VRAM.
Same was with PS4. Console have 8GB, on PC you need 16 RAM and 8 Vram. If PS6 will have 32 GB, you need 32VRAM, and 64GB ram
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and Tup3x

Tup3x

Golden Member
Dec 31, 2016
1,241
1,363
136
By the looks of it in 2 years 12 GB won’t be enough and then in 4 years 16GB won’t be enough. PS6 generation will probably will 24GB VRAM.

Perfectly good GPUs wasted by low VRAM.
You know, for this reason beefy APU with 64GB would be rather interesting. You'd never have VRAM issues. High end cards should be 24GB minimum because 16GB cards will have issues if next gen consoles have 24-32 GB of (shared) RAM. Even in that case maxed out PC settings might hit the 24GB limit.
 

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,916
2,700
136
Ouch, it's not just 8GB. Now 10GB isn't enough either. 12GB RX 6700 XT beating the RTX 3080 by nearly 90% with RT on in a game I want to play. Very happy I went AMD.

Sad 3080 noises.

I wondered at the time I sold my last 6800 XT if I should have kept that rather than the 3080, but running custom loop and not wanting to buy another block really tilted the choice.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tlh97 and blckgrffn

Mopetar

Diamond Member
Jan 31, 2011
8,436
7,631
136
The consoles are essentially already using something akin to Strix Halo. Both Sony and Microsoft have APUs that dedicate a lot of space to the GPU.

The console manufacturers could include more memory in their systems, but to keep costs down they're always going to have less than may otherwise be ideal.

I wonder more if they'll consider trying to implement v-cache in some form, especially if the newer techniques to use it are less expensive or more available. Having a fat SLC under a 300 mm^2 APU would alleviate a lot of pressure on the memory bus and save on having to use more expensive memory types to get the desired performance.

Having 32 GB of memory doesn't do much if you have to squeeze it through a slow and narrow bus.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,308
136
www.teamjuchems.com
Sad 3080 noises.

I wondered at the time I sold my last 6800 XT if I should have kept that rather than the 3080, but running custom loop and not wanting to buy another block really tilted the choice.
Very understandable.

Is there a 3080 12GB or 3080 Ti you could sneak in there with minimal effort? Maybe worth it to squeeze a couple more years out of the loop.
 

blckgrffn

Diamond Member
May 1, 2003
9,676
4,308
136
www.teamjuchems.com
The consoles are essentially already using something akin to Strix Halo. Both Sony and Microsoft have APUs that dedicate a lot of space to the GPU.

The console manufacturers could include more memory in their systems, but to keep costs down they're always going to have less than may otherwise be ideal.

I wonder more if they'll consider trying to implement v-cache in some form, especially if the newer techniques to use it are less expensive or more available. Having a fat SLC under a 300 mm^2 APU would alleviate a lot of pressure on the memory bus and save on having to use more expensive memory types to get the desired performance.

Having 32 GB of memory doesn't do much if you have to squeeze it through a slow and narrow bus.

I guess we'll see what happens, but I expect a 2x increase in the amount of memory in the next consoles, up to 32GB. This will allow them to allocate ~24GB to the GPU and honestly, the memory amount seems to me the "easiest" lever they have left. CPU performance headroom is going to be somewhat limited without a 3D cache setup and even then, the road to 100% uptick in CPU performance without going wider (ie, 10-12 cores) seems murky to me. On the GPU side, I think its even grimmer if the PS5 Pro is the new benchmark. Another 50% increase is going to be quickly swallowed by software and another small step towards true 4k rendering.

This is even at PS5 Pro power consumption levels, which I am not sure is a given. A ~32MB infinity cache would make a huge difference to bandwidth and they can probably use some relatively high density memory and it might be a wash on the cost vs the current memory in the PS5 given the volume in which Sony can purchase.

The easiest way for the next gen consoles to differentiate themselves is through more memory for more higher res textures. 24GB would be a relatively small jump.

My $.02.
 
Last edited:

MrTeal

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2003
3,916
2,700
136
Very understandable.

Is there a 3080 12GB or 3080 Ti you could sneak in there with minimal effort? Maybe worth it to squeeze a couple more years out of the loop.
3080 Ti no, but 3080 12GB or 3090 yes as long as it's a FTW3. I've been keeping an eye out, but the 12GB never really sold well and people at least in my smallish market still seem to want CAD1000/US$700 for their used 3090.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blckgrffn