- Jan 29, 2007
- 6,374
- 1
- 81
I was checking out the 9600gt sli Vs. 3870 crossfire comparison over at techspot.
http://www.techspot.com/articl...deon-hd3870/page5.html
I noticed something interesting about the geforce 9 series... It doesn't hardly take any performance hit at all when Enabling 4xAA and 16xAF. This may be the biggest advantage for the 9 series.
In fear, the 9600 sli went from 93 fps to 91 fps when going from NOAA and NOAF to 4xAA and 16xAF. If you tried to pull that off on a 8800gtx or other G80, You'd take a hefty performance hit. Probably like 93 fps to 60 fps.
I see this being the big advantage with the 9800gtx, It's going to run games in medium to low res like 1024 x 768 or 1280 x 800 and allow to really crank up the Anti aliasing and anisotropic filtering with out losing frames. Think of how this is going to make games like cod4 and crysis look and perform.
It would appear like it was running at 1920x1200 yet perform like it was on 1024x640
Just a thought.
http://www.techspot.com/articl...deon-hd3870/page5.html
I noticed something interesting about the geforce 9 series... It doesn't hardly take any performance hit at all when Enabling 4xAA and 16xAF. This may be the biggest advantage for the 9 series.
In fear, the 9600 sli went from 93 fps to 91 fps when going from NOAA and NOAF to 4xAA and 16xAF. If you tried to pull that off on a 8800gtx or other G80, You'd take a hefty performance hit. Probably like 93 fps to 60 fps.
I see this being the big advantage with the 9800gtx, It's going to run games in medium to low res like 1024 x 768 or 1280 x 800 and allow to really crank up the Anti aliasing and anisotropic filtering with out losing frames. Think of how this is going to make games like cod4 and crysis look and perform.
It would appear like it was running at 1920x1200 yet perform like it was on 1024x640
Just a thought.