Originally posted by: OVERKILL
Originally posted by: josh6079
The 7900GX2 is one of the worst price/performance ratio products you can get. In some cases the X1900XT can beat it, but it mostly trails with 10-15fps generally and costs ~$200 less. Of course, if you want absolutely the highest frames and don't care as much about price, or features limited to one company or the other, it is the purchase to make.
This is the kind of information Josh that I was looking for. :beer:
I have no problem spending $500 on a video card but will I get $200 more performance as compared to a 1900 XT ($300).
From the sounds of it, the 1900 XT (512mb) is the smarter choice.
Btw, what are your thoughts on cooling this thing?
I've been reading about how hot it gets and was a bit curious.
It is not worth the approximate $200 premium when you take into account the amount of frames it leads the X1900 by. Sure, it can sometimes be ~20 frames faster, but when it is, the X1900 is already doing playable frames. That and if you look at the cost per frame you'll be spending with the GX2, it can be $20 or more for one frame.
As far as cooling goes, the stock cooler is pretty effecient, but also loud. If noise is going to be an issue, there are several third-party coolers that work with less noise. However, it is only loud when running at higher speeds. The fan can adjust as well as even lock into a certain speed if desired. Nevertheless, if it heats up, you're going to hear a hair dryer.
Another thing to consider would be overclocking. If you do plan on doing it, the GX2 doesn't offer as much headroom as the X1900. Third-party coolers for it are scarce if existent at all and the only ones I've seen are for water loops.
I don't mind spending $500 on a video card either and just recently was in the market for another card. My old X1900XTX caught a drop of water from my loop and I was a little careless; I didn't let it evaporate for as long as I should have. I've been limping for a while on an X1900GT and it has done alright, but nothing compared to what I once had. I was thinking about the GX2 or even a 7900GTX, but I decided to just go with the X1900XT since it was so cheap and I already knew how well they performed in all of my games. I've been able to install any game and run it on its highest settings with that card and still get playable frames for about 7 months before I killed it. I didn't want to risk getting a GX2 and have to deal with chipset bios's or SLI profiles/quirks. Plus, I love to overclock and with the X1900 I can do it easier with software voltage settings; Nvidia doesn't have that capability.
So, if you ask me, the X1900 is an all-around great deal minus a few shortcomings. The GX2 is less of an all-around great deal minus a few shortcomings. As far as what specifics you may want that might rule-out one company over the other, that is up to you. (i.e. TrAA/AAA, HDR+AA/just AA or HDR, HQAF/AF, power consumptions, drivers, etc.)