• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

$79+ million to be governor?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Qacer

Platinum Member
Source:
http://www2.tbo.com/content/2011/feb/02/final-scott-campaign-figure-7976339392/c_3/#comments

Final Scott campaign figure: $79,763,393.92
By WILLIAM MARCH | The Tampa Tribune

The final campaign expense reports from the Florida governor's race, filed today, showed Gov. Rick Scott far exceeded all past spending records for a Florida campaign, spending $79,763,394 through his own campaign and a political committee he funded.

That amount represents $62 million in spending by the Scott campaign, plus $17 million by his political action committee, Let's Get to Work.

Scott loaned his campaign $60,391,000 of which he repaid himself $65,474, the report shows. Let's Get to Work got another $12.8 million from Scott's wife's trust fund.

Scott's opponent, Alex Sink, spent $11.3 million through her campaign, plus $153,000 through an independent committee.

The outcome in the race: Scott 48.9 percent and Sink 47.7 percent.

With that amount of money, he was only slightly ahead. If Charlie Christ did not run, those votes would probably go to Sink.

Plus, it seemed like he made some money from his $60k loan. Nice.

I wonder what he's going to get out of the $79+ million that he spent.
 
Hell...that's chump change...

http://www.modbee.com/2011/01/31/1536473/whitman-spends-1785m-on-failed.html

Whitman spends $178.5M on failed Calif. gov's race

SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- Final election reports released Monday show Jerry Brown spent about $36.5 million in his successful bid to become governor, just a fraction of the $178.5 million spent by his Republican opponent, Meg Whitman, in what was the costliest campaign for statewide office in the nation's history.

Brown was buoyed by millions of dollars in spending by union-backed groups. But Whitman, the former eBay CEO, tapped $144 million from her personal fortune and raised the rest from donors in the 2010 California governor's race, including the primary and general election cycles.

She surpassed the previous record for personal spending in a campaign - the $109 million New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg spent in his quest for a third term.

While the bulk of Whitman's campaign spending went to buy television ads that dominated the airwaves for most of 2010, the billionaire spent more than $20 million on campaign consultants and staff, many of whom hailed from the campaigns of former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger or the Republican presidential campaigns of Sen. John McCain and Mitt Romney.

According to Monday's filing, Whitman's campaign paid $1.3 million to Mike Murphy, her chief strategist, whose Bonaparte Films LLC also received an investment from Whitman before the campaign. Her personal adviser and friend Henry Gomez, who worked for her at eBay Inc., received nearly $1 million, and Jeff Randle, who was a campaign and political adviser to Schwarzenegger, received $550,000.

Whitman paid $1.4 million to finance chairman and former Mitt Romney adviser Spencer Zwick and more than $1 million to the Sacramento accounting firm Bell, McAndrews & Hiltachk.

Brown's campaign reported spending $29 million on TV and radio ads placed by a Georgia-based Democratic advertising firm, LUC Media, according to reports filed with the secretary of state's office. Brown's chief campaign consultant, Steven Glazer, was the highest paid of his staffers, making $235,000.

What Brown lacked in campaign consultants, he made up with outside political muscle. The Democrat was aided by at least $26 million in spending by independent groups, mostly funded by labor unions.

Brown also relied on the goodwill of dozens of unpaid advisers and longtime Democratic strategists who were not on his payroll.

He bucked national GOP momentum last fall when he handily defeated Whitman by 13 percentage points. He persuaded voters that the nation's most populous state needed a seasoned public official, not a political novice, to step in and solve its financial troubles.

"The voters embraced his experience and authenticity and rejected her money and simplistic message," Glazer said Monday.

The notoriously frugal Brown raised $40.5 million for his campaign and managed to end the year with money left over; he reported a cash balance of $4 million at the end of the year. Whitman had $16,196 left.

Whitman spent her fortune on wall-to-wall advertising, including more than $118 million to Washington, D.C.-based Republican advertising agency Smart Media Group. She spent more than $1.1 million on private planes, $504,000 for AT&T phone bills, and nearly $80,000 on a personal photographer who trailed her wherever she campaigned, allowing Brown to present a contrast with his message of government austerity.

An e-mail to one of Whitman's former consultants wasn't returned Monday night.
 
Think you might be a little confused, Crist was running for Senator - he already was Governor. It was Kendrick Meek (D) that they asked to bow out of the race to boost Crist (I) up against Rubio (R), who won.

That being said, Rick Scott is a douche.
 
If all this money went to actually balancing the budgets rather than paying for a platform on which the candidate can opine over how to balance the budget, this country might not be in such dire straits.

I usually don't sound so liberal, but I feel like a lot of money could be put to better use if politicians were restricted to regulated, public-sponsored forums to voice their candidacies.
 
It does seem like something's a tiny bit wrong with the way things work when people are willing to gamble tens of millions of dollars on a job whose (legal) salary would never pay anywhere near that much during the person's entire time in office.
 
It does seem like something's a tiny bit wrong with the way things work when people are willing to gamble tens of millions of dollars on a job whose (legal) salary would never pay anywhere near that much during the person's entire time in office.

Ya but we all know (legal) salary means nothing for a politician.
 
If all this money went to actually balancing the budgets rather than paying for a platform on which the candidate can opine over how to balance the budget, this country might not be in such dire straits.

I usually don't sound so liberal, but I feel like a lot of money could be put to better use if politicians were restricted to regulated, public-sponsored forums to voice their candidacies.

Wouldn't the spending of the money count as a type of stimulus? TV, Print, staffers, etc...all being paid from a private source and/or donations?

I agree it would be good for it to all go to schools or something, but its better that their personal fortunes are squandered vs. spending my tax dollars on the same...
 
Scott and Whitman are morons and it doesn't surprise me that they wanted to buy a governorship. And since our douchebag supreme court ruled that candidates don't have to reveal where their campaign funding is derived, this country is headed for the shtter. Don't be surprised to find out that certain Senators are backed by countries like China.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top