• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

7800 ultra is indeed coming.

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Kalessian
Wow, thanks for proving Zobar right. You managed to refute all of my points with a.... oh wait, you didn't.
Yep I'm dead wrong, you can assume that and be happy. Doesnt change squat.

Originally posted by: Kalessian
This is bordering on obvious trolling. dingo kept calling out southpawuni unprovoked until south actually came out to defend himself. Isn't that against the rules?
Yeah, the fact that he attacked another member in that thread obviously "owning" him on multiple occasions was not?
 
I skipped all the arguing, but shouldn't Nvidia be able to reach even higher speeds with lets say more voltage and a bigger 2 slot cooler? I was thinking more like 525/1500, but maybe that is impossible?

From what I hear, the heat output and power requirements SHOULD be upped a bit since the memory is the one that makes the card power hungry (at least thats the case with the X1800XT). (I have no official knowledge of the suppsed ultra card so don't quote me on that). Despite that, it will still run well if they have a 2 slot cooler with an exhaust. I personally like those better, as they don't add to case temps and should help even witht he CPU temps 🙂.
 
Originally posted by: crazydingo
Originally posted by: Kalessian
Wow, thanks for proving Zobar right. You managed to refute all of my points with a.... oh wait, you didn't.
Yep I'm dead wrong, you can assume that and be happy. Doesnt change squat.

Originally posted by: Kalessian
This is bordering on obvious trolling. dingo kept calling out southpawuni unprovoked until south actually came out to defend himself. Isn't that against the rules?
Yeah, the fact that he attacked another member in that thread obviously "owning" him on multiple occasions was not?

Wow keep digging deeper.

You really need to worry about yourself. Not me and other threads. You will make less enemys that way.

Like Kalessian said. Leave my name out of this, you smugly mentioned me in this thread otherwise I wouldnt have even stepped in at all. Digging your own grave.

Just replying to these guys points directly and in quotes.. if you can't just say you hadn't thought of it that way and move on with your life.. ?
 
Originally posted by: Hacp
I skipped all the arguing, but shouldn't Nvidia be able to reach even higher speeds with lets say more voltage and a bigger 2 slot cooler? I was thinking more like 525/1500, but maybe that is impossible?

From what I hear, the heat output and power requirements SHOULD be upped a bit since the memory is the one that makes the card power hungry (at least thats the case with the X1800XT). (I have no official knowledge of the suppsed ultra card so don't quote me on that). Despite that, it will still run well if they have a 2 slot cooler with an exhaust. I personally like those better, as they don't add to case temps and should help even witht he CPU temps 🙂.

QFT, but i think its possible. Isnt the GTX at 1.4v? and the GT 1.2v? I heard you could get pretty high clocks by upping the voltage on the GTX cards. But then the ultra or a higher GTX would also producing the same amount of power usage. BTW it is a 24pipe card so.
 
Originally posted by: southpawuni
You really need to worry about yourself. Not me and other threads. You will make less enemys that way.
Enemys? What are you turtle or something?

Originally posted by: southpawuni
Just replying to these guys points directly and in quotes.. if you can't just say you hadn't thought of it that way and move on with your life.. ?
Exactly. What Zober. Kalle did was put words in my mouth.
 
Originally posted by: Hacp
I skipped all the arguing, but shouldn't Nvidia be able to reach even higher speeds with lets say more voltage and a bigger 2 slot cooler? I was thinking more like 525/1500, but maybe that is impossible?

From what I hear, the heat output and power requirements SHOULD be upped a bit since the memory is the one that makes the card power hungry (at least thats the case with the X1800XT). (I have no official knowledge of the suppsed ultra card so don't quote me on that). Despite that, it will still run well if they have a 2 slot cooler with an exhaust. I personally like those better, as they don't add to case temps and should help even witht he CPU temps 🙂.


I seemed to have forgotten that higher memory speeds means more power consumption. Thanks for pointing that out.

I think 525 mhz isn't asking too much. 500mhz is more reasonable, though. And this is dual-slot... expect the higher memory speeds to add to the heat. Single slot couldn't get away with 500/1500.

What kind of temps are people getting from 7800GTX cards at 500+ mhz with the nv silencer?
 
Think it was 40~ idle, 65~ load.

Some of them reached speeds up to 520/1400 with NV silencer 5 rev3.

Edit- the 4500 quadro runs at 550mhz with its cooler. And the fact the temps are about 50ish idle 67ish load at those clocks i wouldnt be surprised if Nvidia used these coolers on the "ultra" or the GTX 512mb variant.

Edit2- its made out of aluminium, imagine that heat sink made out of copper 😀
 
Prediction/Speculation:

7800GTX/7800Ultra will be: 490 to 520 core/ 1400 to 1500 512MB 1.26 GDDR3.
Dual Slot Cooler that is used on the Quadro, or Single slot copper cooler.

AND this is all if Nvidia does NOT shrink to 90nm. (Doubtful until G80).
 
Originally posted by: nitromullet
Sounds good, but NV's already got all the money they're gonna squeeze out me this round 🙂

Damn, it looks like they squeezed an ASS load of money from you. Two 7800GTX KOs?!:Q 🙂
 
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Prediction/Speculation:

7800GTX/7800Ultra will be: 490 to 520 core/ 1400 to 1500 512MB 1.26 GDDR3.
Dual Slot Cooler that is used on the Quadro, or Single slot copper cooler.

AND this is all if Nvidia does NOT shrink to 90nm. (Doubtful until G80).



That would kind of suck... I'm hoping there would be reason for me to sell my GTX (look for it at ~375.00 and now with the NV Silencer 5!) and spend a couple hundred to get the Ultra... but if that's all the difference, I'm within a few % of that already not counting the 512
 
Yes, you do have some nice clockage there Frakal. 490/1380 with NV silencer.
On the other hand, the 1.26ns GDDR3 could reach close to 1600 if cooled decently and the extra 256MB of mem is also nice as a couple of games seem to be benefitting from it now.

Now if it is a die shrink to 90nm, look for no less than 550MHz core.
 
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Prediction/Speculation:

7800GTX/7800Ultra will be: 490 to 520 core/ 1400 to 1500 512MB 1.26 GDDR3.
Dual Slot Cooler that is used on the Quadro, or Single slot copper cooler.

AND this is all if Nvidia does NOT shrink to 90nm. (Doubtful until G80).

i've read from several sources they already have g70 at 90nm. last i heard was expect them in jan, however i'm not sure whether it will be mid-range or high-end parts.

 
Originally posted by: CaiNaM
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Prediction/Speculation:

7800GTX/7800Ultra will be: 490 to 520 core/ 1400 to 1500 512MB 1.26 GDDR3.
Dual Slot Cooler that is used on the Quadro, or Single slot copper cooler.

AND this is all if Nvidia does NOT shrink to 90nm. (Doubtful until G80).

i've read from several sources they already have g70 at 90nm. last i heard was expect them in jan, however i'm not sure whether it will be mid-range or high-end parts.

Unless I heard something different altogether, the G72 (7600) would be the next 90nm part from NV. You heard there would be a 90nm G70 in Jan.? That would be niceness.

 
G71 and the G72. Also G73M if you look at the list from the 81 series driver as it supports these new cards.

The G72 is apparently the refesh of the G70 hence the 7800 series.
The 7600GT would be nice 🙂
 
Considering most sources indicate that the PS3 GPU is little more than the G70 on 90nm, it wouldn't be too much of a stretch to put that same tech back into the PC GPU. I wouldn't expect miracles in increases, but a low 500's core with ~1500 mem would be a very strong competitor to the x1800XT. Of course, back to the original point, if nV really meant it when they said no Ultra, they could just be banking on the GTX's strong scaling and the ease of SLi, being that no one knows when x1800XT Crossfire Editions will show up.

Oh and just to quickly address the little sidetrack earlier: Southpawuni, please don't defend me, you're just as bad as him, you just bat for the other team. I care little for fanboys; both red and green varieties are equally annoying. That being said, don't let him bait you when it's clear he's trolling for a response.
 
Just a little off topic:
From digitimes about the G72, it said we might be seeing alot of SLi type cards like the 3d1 6~00 series from gigabyte and Asus dual.

IF Nvidia is going multi threaded for its drivers, i have a feeling that Nvidia might be going dual GPU. The 90nm transfer apparently shrinks the die size by alot, and im suspecting Nvidia do that. Just specualation..

 
Both the 7800GTX and the X1800XT are great cards from the reviews I've seen. Not a whole bunch of info is available on the overclocking potential of the latter card but from the little I've seen it does have pretty good headroom. Here is an interesting read about one of the guru overclockers. Yes, the card was cooled with exotic cooling (dry ice) but Sampsa says that he didn't experience any artifacting at 860MHz and only stopped there because of a limitation in the software he was using. He only bumped the voltage to the gpu by .1V to achieve that too. Couple that with the fact the X1800XL he tried with only an XT cooler reached 700/1400 and my curiosity is definetely piqued.

The one overclocking area where I think the X1800XT has a distinct advantage over the 7800GTX is the voltage regulation. From the above mentioned article, it looks like voltage for the ATI cards (both core and mem) can be controlled via software instead of a somewhat complicated voltmod like the 7800GTX's need. For anyone with watercooling or high-end aircooling that is a HUGE boon. No more sweaty hands as you try to solder a trim pot onto your $500+ card, now as long as you can keep your mouse steady you can bump the voltage up.

Most guys with 7800GTX's seem stuck at ~520MHz on the core, even with fairly good cooling (H2O) because of the lack of voltage. If the headroom of the X1800XT proves to be good I'll probably sell off my 7800GTX for one just for the that reason alone.
 
Originally posted by: fierydemise
Thats the million dollar question, if 512MB really does make a difference like the X800XL show them to be then the 512MB GTX might be good enough to be called an "ultra." Either way if it means more price drops on the 7800 cards then I'm happy

:music: :music: :music:

My thoughts exactly; may it push the prices down.
 
Originally posted by: AnnoyedGrunt
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814150105

Looks like an Nvidia reference cooler to me, and single slot as well.

Here's another
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.asp?Item=N82E16814130237

Getting 1500 MHz effective memory should be no more difficult for NV than it is for ATI.

Don't worry though Crazydingo, ATI still makes great cards.

As far as what NV will do, I believe if they can make more money on a higher clocked card with 512 MB of fast RAM, and if it gets them closer in performance to 1800XT, they will release a card. In the end it won't matter to me since they say they won't be dropping prices on lower end cards until after Christmas. I hope ATI makes a big dent in NV sales and forces them to drop prices. Maybe that way in a year or two I can upgrade from my X800XL to an X2000XL or whatever will be available at the time (and it won't cost more than the rest of my computer).

-D'oh!


This is a good post.

I'm actually amazed at how much prices have already dropped on GTXs, the reference clocked ones are $430 now, which to me is a great price for that card.
 
Originally posted by: crazydingo
That XFX is an exception and I think a very bad investment.
How can it be a "bad investment" with a double lifetime warranty?

Why do you think Asus & EVGA's 490MHz GTXs use dual slot coolers? Why do you think BFG clocked their card (single-slot) cooler to 460MHz only?
Nitro told you his EVGAs are still single slot, and that the only difference is the decorative casing?

Your bias is as clear as day. You keep comparing these vendor oc results with a stock cooler.
Because XFX uses a stock cooler? (and EVGAs is close)

Yeah "I'm digging a hole" just like "southawni" keeps owning people. (imaginary) :laugh: ;D
Why insult him when he's not even in this thread? (I see he joined to defend himself, but still, there was no reason to call him out here because of past disagreements)

 
Originally posted by: linkgoron
Originally posted by: crazydingo
Originally posted by: ExarKun333
thats a bunch of crap...you are saying the XT OC's to that when they dont even exist? i will believe it when they are released and ppl can OC to that....speculative crap...
Good OC results because it is on 90nm. Yeah bunch of crap. :roll:
except maybe ATI used all the 90nm potential on getting their high stock clock-speeds on the x1800XT?

This may well be true- to make a 16 pipe card competitive I think they needed to clock it as high as possible. Nothing wrong with that, I'm personally of the opinion OCing high end parts isn't worth the risk, but have nothing against those who have the money trying.
 
Back
Top