Ok, this thread is really getting way more complicated than it should be. I went through that
review Toyota posted and dug deep for actual specs of the GTX560SE:
Reference GTX560SE clock speeds of
736/1472/
3828 mhz memory
The review Toyota linked uses an overclocked GTX560SE with clocks (801/1601/4008mhz memory). So you guys linked me an 8.8% factory preoverclocked GTX560SE to justify that it's 8% faster than a stock HD7770/6850 that I was using for comparison this entire time. That 8% advantage the 8.8% overclocked 560SE has is no wonder why none of the the #s added up against a stock 7770/6850/GTX460. :sneaky:
A stock 560SE card is going to be = HD7770 and thus
10% slower than a stock 6850 card. An overclocked 800mhz 560SE = stock HD6850 but
HD6850 can be overclocked to 6870 speeds. At those speeds it'll be miles away from an overclocked 560SE (~ GTX460 1GB).
None of this really matters since 560SE loses to an HD6850 / GTX560 which cost $130 on Newegg and right now it costs $25 more than an HD7770, while consuming more power and having last generation feature set. Again, you asked me to go into greath depth to find such specific information but in the end all it has done is wasted a bunch of time to show you that a GTX560SE is 10% slower than a stock 6850 and that an overclocked 560SE has no chance whatsoever to catch an overclocked 6850, which is what I said from the beginning (if you guys didn't link me a review with an overclocked 560SE, this thread would have been over a long-time ago).
In the end, you have actually ignored both the OP's request and the current pricing structure of 560SE vs. the much cheaper 7770 or the faster 6850/560 cards on Newegg in trying to prove a point that GTX560SE is "as good as the 6850", and in the end even that has been shown to be false, while not helping the OP at all since at $130, GTX560SE is terribly overpriced and shouldn't even a consideration.