w0Uld I+ b3 +0o muCH 0f @ 8oTHER Ph0r J00 5cr3W 0FF5 t0 po5T 4
link to the original post, 1N5TE4D oph JU5+ 8lurTiN9 rEp0$+? :frown:
+Hi5 IS 4C+u4lly StAR+1nG +o pI55 m3 oPhPH n0w. ipH j00 TH1Nk it'5 nOt mUch bOTh3R fOr 5OM3onE +O 534RCh h19H and l0W f0r THE$3 PR3v1ou$ ToP1c$, it $HoULD b3 n0 +rou8l3 4T 4ll For j00 +o ac+U4lLY lInK To IT @s ProopH. I+ WoUlD b3 a HEll Oph @ l0T M0re u53pHuL +H4N Y4pp1ng rePO5T! !@%#*&^**dickheads$$**(*%^*:disgust:
- Would it be too much of a bother for you screw offs to post a link to the original post, instead of just blurting repost? :frown:
This is actually starting to piss me off now. If you think it's not much bother for someone to search high and low for these previous topics, it should be NO TROUBLE AT ALL for you to actually link to it as proof. It would be a hell of a lot more useful than yapping repost! !@%#*&^**dickheads$$**(*%^*:disgust: