$700M fraud, settled for $500k fine

JEDI

Lifer
Sep 25, 2001
29,391
2,738
126
http://www.businessinsider.com/theranos-elizabeth-holmes-sec-resolution-agreement-2018-3

The SEC alleged that Theranos "made numerous false and misleading statements in investor presentations, product demonstrations, and media articles" about the company's blood-testing technology while raising more than $700 million.

Settled the charges by:
-agreed to give up financial and voting control of the company.
-Holmes has to pay a $500,000 fine.
-She cannot be a director or officer of a publicly traded company for 10 years.
note: Theranos is a privately-held company, which means she can continue to be CEO :eek:


Apparently white collar crime does pay :mad:
 

hal2kilo

Lifer
Feb 24, 2009
25,701
12,022
136
http://www.businessinsider.com/theranos-elizabeth-holmes-sec-resolution-agreement-2018-3

The SEC alleged that Theranos "made numerous false and misleading statements in investor presentations, product demonstrations, and media articles" about the company's blood-testing technology while raising more than $700 million.

Settled the charges by:
-agreed to give up financial and voting control of the company.
-Holmes has to pay a $500,000 fine.
-She cannot be a director or officer of a publicly traded company for 10 years.
note: Theranos is a privately-held company, which means she can continue to be CEO :eek:


Apparently white collar crime does pay :mad:
No different than Trump U.
 

thilanliyan

Lifer
Jun 21, 2005
12,040
2,256
126
From what I've read, that $700 million would first go back to investors (ie. she wouldn't get it)?
 

IJTSSG

Golden Member
Aug 12, 2014
1,126
281
136
She also has to return 19 million shares of stock and convert other stock from class a to class b. That is, on paper at least, a significant amount.

What's not addressed here is the impact to all of their customers. They got off easy.
 

UNCjigga

Lifer
Dec 12, 2000
25,403
9,991
136
Wasn't there someone on the Trump team who was a former board member for Theranos?

Oh yeah, General Mattis...he had to leave the board in January '17 after press reported his association with Theranos and potential conflicts of interest. Hmm...
 
Nov 29, 2006
15,821
4,350
136
And they wonder why companies continue doing things like this. Penalty is nothing compared to the profits gained. It pays to be sleezy.
 

interchange

Diamond Member
Oct 10, 1999
8,026
2,879
136
Yeah they apparently used a shell corporation to purchase lab testing machinery from other companies and used it to run their tests instead of their own unreliable technology. I wonder how serious an attempt there ever was to develop a real technological advancement since it does seem there was a (bad) product that actually existed. At some point, it just became about building wealth through obtaining investments fraudulently representing an actual product being used. It's OK not to have revenue if your valuation keeps climbing and you can keep your burn rate low enough to keep funding your growth via new investment.
 

Sunburn74

Diamond Member
Oct 5, 2009
5,076
2,635
136
Yeah they apparently used a shell corporation to purchase lab testing machinery from other companies and used it to run their tests instead of their own unreliable technology. I wonder how serious an attempt there ever was to develop a real technological advancement since it does seem there was a (bad) product that actually existed. At some point, it just became about building wealth through obtaining investments fraudulently representing an actual product being used. It's OK not to have revenue if your valuation keeps climbing and you can keep your burn rate low enough to keep funding your growth via new investment.
Wow I didn't hear it was that bad or that level of fraud. That is pretty incredible stuff there.

Also didn't the company file for bankruptcy or something? Doesn't that somehow end up returning assets to investors?