7 ABC affiliates ordered not to air 'Nightline'

GTaudiophile

Lifer
Oct 24, 2000
29,767
33
81
In a statement online, the Sinclair group said the "Nightline" program "appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq."

...

"Mr. Koppel and 'Nightline' are hiding behind this so-called tribute in an effort to highlight only one aspect of the war effort and in doing so to influence public opinion against the military action in Iraq," the statement said.


About time someone stood up for the truth!
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
In a statement online, the Sinclair group said the "Nightline" program "appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq."

...

"Mr. Koppel and 'Nightline' are hiding behind this so-called tribute in an effort to highlight only one aspect of the war effort and in doing so to influence public opinion against the military action in Iraq," the statement said.


About time someone stoof up for the truth!

Sinclair's decision, announced Thursday, drew angry calls from the public and a sharp response from ABC News.

"We respectfully disagree with Sinclair's decision to pre-empt 'Nightline's' tribute to America's fallen soldiers," ABC News said in a statement. "The 'Nightline' broadcast is an expression of respect which simply seeks to honor those who have laid down their lives for this country."

Some of the stations have received many calls and e-mails in response to Sinclair's decision.

"I have not gotten one positive response," said an assignment desk editor at WSYX, the ABC station in Columbus, Ohio.

WEAR in Pensacola, Florida, has been inundated with phone calls and e-mails. A man who answered the phone in the station's newsroom said people mostly wanted to know why the decision was made.
---------------------------------------------------------

Heil Sinclair!!!
 

SViscusi

Golden Member
Apr 12, 2000
1,200
8
81
Another perspective

Viewers in eight television markets will not see Friday?s broadcast of ABC?s ?Nightline? ? during which anchor Ted Koppel will read the names of hundreds of U.S. servicemembers killed in Iraq ? because of a national broadcasting chain?s decision to bar the episode.
Maryland-based Sinclair Broadcast Group announced Thursday that the eight ABC affiliates it owns would not show Friday?s ?Nightline? because reading the names ?appears to be motivated by a political agenda designed to undermine the efforts of the United States in Iraq.?

To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

?Nightline? officials told The Associated Press that the broadcast is intended simply as a tribute to fallen soldiers, sailors, airmen and Marines.

The ABC broadcast will use names, hometowns and photographs provided by Army Times Publishing Co., the publisher of this Web site.

Among Sinclair?s ABC stations is one in Asheville, N.C., where some family members of servicemembers killed in Iraq said the company?s decision is misguided.

?That?s ridiculous,? Beth Whitener told the Asheville Citizen-Times. Whitener?s husband, 19-year-old Army Pfc. Joey Whitener was killed Nov. 15 when two Black Hawk helicopters crashed in Mosul, Iraq.

?I think it? s more than appropriate to show those faces because they were over there fighting for our freedom. I think they have a right to be honored and shown on TV.?

Brenda Franklin, whose husband, Army Staff Sgt. Bobby Franklin, 38, was killed in August in an explosion in Baghdad, said the public needs to see the faces of the soldiers who have died in Iraq.

?We have paid a lot,? she told the newspaper. ?My family has paid a lot. I think everybody needs to see the faces.?

In addition to its Asheville station, Sinclair owns ABC affiliates in St. Louis; Columbus, Ohio; Greensboro, N.C.; Charleston, W.Va.; Mobile, Ala. (which also serves the Pensacola, Fla., area); Springfield, Mass.; and Tallahassee, Fla.

Nightline?s decision has come under criticism from some conservative commentators for the decision to read the names. Koppel, who was embedded with the Army?s 3rd Infantry Division during its drive to Baghdad last year, was widely praised by television critics for providing some of the most compelling coverage of the war.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

Riiiight... good excuse! Well then, the 9/11 reading of the names was political motivated as well! they did not read the names of Americans killed in Vietnam, or the Korean War, or World War 2, or Custer's last stand!!

Censorship and secrecy, the main tools the Bush Administration have to solve any problem.

Welcome to USFA, the United States of Fundamentalist America
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: lozina
To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

Riiiight... good excuse! Well then, the 9/11 reading of the names was political motivated as well! they did not read the names of Americans killed in Vietnam, or the Korean War, or World War 2, or Custer's last stand!!

Censorship and secrecy, the main tools the Bush Administration have to solve any problem.

Welcome to USFA, the United States of Fundamentalist America

Yep, let's bulldoze the new WWII Memorial and the rest while we're at it.
 

tnitsuj

Diamond Member
May 22, 2003
5,446
0
76
Originally posted by: lozina
To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

Riiiight... good excuse! Well then, the 9/11 reading of the names was political motivated as well! they did not read the names of Americans killed in Vietnam, or the Korean War, or World War 2, or Custer's last stand!!

Censorship and secrecy, the main tools the Bush Administration have to solve any problem.

Welcome to USFA, the United States of Fundamentalist America


Wait, didn't Koppell read the names of the 9/11 victims one year after the event?
 

BDawg

Lifer
Oct 31, 2000
11,631
2
0
In WWII, names appeared in papers and on the radio. In Vietnam, they were read on TV.

Why is it only a stink if Bush is up for reelection?
 

Steeplerot

Lifer
Mar 29, 2004
13,051
6
81
According to campaign finance records, four of Sinclair's top executives each have given the maximum campaign contribution of $2,000 to the Bush-Cheney re-election campaign.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: lozina
To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

Riiiight... good excuse! Well then, the 9/11 reading of the names was political motivated as well! they did not read the names of Americans killed in Vietnam, or the Korean War, or World War 2, or Custer's last stand!!

Censorship and secrecy, the main tools the Bush Administration have to solve any problem.

Welcome to USFA, the United States of Fundamentalist America


Wait, didn't Koppell read the names of the 9/11 victims one year after the event?


I don't think he did... Nightline is not long enough to read that many names unless it was made into a 2-hour special?
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: lozina
To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

Riiiight... good excuse! Well then, the 9/11 reading of the names was political motivated as well! they did not read the names of Americans killed in Vietnam, or the Korean War, or World War 2, or Custer's last stand!!

Censorship and secrecy, the main tools the Bush Administration have to solve any problem.

Welcome to USFA, the United States of Fundamentalist America

Yep, let's bulldoze the new WWII Memorial and the rest while we're at it.

Wait until after the weekend...checking it out tomorrow :)
 

Bulk Beef

Diamond Member
Aug 14, 2001
5,466
0
76
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: tnitsuj
Originally posted by: lozina
To justify the decision, a statement on the company?s Web site cited the fact that Koppel will read the names of the more than 500 U.S. troops killed in Iraq, and not the names of Americans killed in the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks and similar attacks since.

Riiiight... good excuse! Well then, the 9/11 reading of the names was political motivated as well! they did not read the names of Americans killed in Vietnam, or the Korean War, or World War 2, or Custer's last stand!!

Censorship and secrecy, the main tools the Bush Administration have to solve any problem.

Welcome to USFA, the United States of Fundamentalist America


Wait, didn't Koppell read the names of the 9/11 victims one year after the event?


I don't think he did... Nightline is not long enough to read that many names unless it was made into a 2-hour special?
They did read the names at the memorial ceremony at Ground Zero - no idea if Koppel was one of the readers or not.

And this is a really stupid decision on Sinclair's part. I'll reserve judgement on whether Nightline is "motivated by a political agenda" until I see it (though I doubt it), but Sinclair is without a doubt motivated by their own agenda. Weak.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: sward666
Originally posted by: lozina


I don't think he did... Nightline is not long enough to read that many names unless it was made into a 2-hour special?
They did read the names at the memorial ceremony at Ground Zero - no idea if Koppel was one of the readers or not.

And this is a really stupid decision on Sinclair's part. I'll reserve judgement on whether Nightline is "motivated by a political agenda" until I see it (though I doubt it), but Sinclair is without a doubt motivated by their own agenda. Weak.


Yeah I definitely know about those, I think they've been reading the names on every anniversary so far? I know this past September I was listening to them reading the names on the radio, though it was not by Ted Koppel, it was by a group of children.
 

burnedout

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 1999
6,249
2
0
Meanwhile, it is kinda coincidental that ABC decides on broadcasting this during the second day of the 'May sweeps' instead of Memorial Day.

Koppel, also in the announcement, acknowledged that Memorial Day might have been "the most logical occasion" to do the program. Ya think?

"But we felt that the impact would actually be greater on a day when the entire nation is not focused on war dead," he said.

Ah yes, and, of course, Memorial Day falls outside the May sweeps, when viewer levels are used by the networks to set advertising rates. Memorial Day is also traditionally a day of very low television viewing. He forgot to mention that stuff.

Sievers and others we spoke with at ABC News insisted they did not realize that the May sweeps start tomorrow.
Washington Post
 

UltraQuiet

Banned
Sep 22, 2001
5,755
0
0
Sievers and others we spoke with at ABC News insisted they did not realize that the May sweeps start tomorrow.

HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA. That's like Bush or Kerry uttering some gem and then claiming they didn't know it was an election year. Gimme a break.
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
this Country is Going To Hell in a handbasket. Nothing Can Be done With Out Overanylizing the politics Behind anything before the looney Left or Fascist Right call Foul and cry and Whine. Everyone Hast to Point out The Hidden "Agenda" behind everything.

This is Just another Example of How both Parties only care about themselves and The Power They Have.

This Country Needs a more uniting Less political Leader. Too bad their Isnt one on the november Ballet.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: smashp
this Country is Going To Hell in a handbasket. Nothing Can Be done With Out Overanylizing the politics Behind anything before the looney Left or Fascist Right call Foul and cry and Whine. Everyone Hast to Point out The Hidden "Agenda" behind everything.

This is Just another Example of How both Parties only care about themselves and The Power They Have.

This Country Needs a more uniting Less political Leader. Too bad their Isnt one on the november Ballet.

Well said.

Elect me, free Tin Foil Hats for all.

"A Tin Foil Hat for Every Head"
 
Jan 12, 2003
3,498
0
0
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: smashp
this Country is Going To Hell in a handbasket. Nothing Can Be done With Out Overanylizing the politics Behind anything before the looney Left or Fascist Right call Foul and cry and Whine. Everyone Hast to Point out The Hidden "Agenda" behind everything.

This is Just another Example of How both Parties only care about themselves and The Power They Have.

This Country Needs a more uniting Less political Leader. Too bad their Isnt one on the november Ballet.

Well said.

Elect me, free Tin Foil Hats for all.

"A Tin Foil Hat for Every Head"

Let me guess, you would raise taxes for that handout? :)
 

totalcommand

Platinum Member
Apr 21, 2004
2,487
0
0
Sinclair is possibly the most unpatriotic company I have heard of. Refusing to air a remembrance of soldiers who died in Iraq? That's just horrible. I guess they like the heroism that Pat got, they just think these soldiers aren't as good as him. These soldiers are just as much heroes as Pat is.
 

lozina

Lifer
Sep 10, 2001
11,711
8
81
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Sinclair is possibly the most unpatriotic company I have heard of. Refusing to air a remembrance of soldiers who died in Iraq? That's just horrible. I guess they like the heroism that Pat got, they just think these soldiers aren't as good as him. These soldiers are just as much heroes as Pat is.

Did they air the Bush campaign ad with 9/11 images?
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: totalcommand
Sinclair is possibly the most unpatriotic company I have heard of. Refusing to air a remembrance of soldiers who died in Iraq? That's just horrible. I guess they like the heroism that Pat got, they just think these soldiers aren't as good as him. These soldiers are just as much heroes as Pat is.

Did they air the Bush campaign ad with 9/11 images?



or the Superbowl in 2002 with the U2 Tribute Scrolling all the names of the Victims of 9-11. This is a very good point. Its Ok to Use american Deaths to anger the public, But We cant Remember soldier deaths until 60 years latter when they Realize, For example "WE still dont have a WW2 memorial"
 

Moonbeam

Elite Member
Nov 24, 1999
74,960
6,802
126
The function of news needs to be taken away from corporate america. Profit and truth are never good bedfellows.