Originally posted by: Silex
Wonder if I should trade in the EVO9 and M3 for one us these bad boys?
Originally posted by: Silex
Wonder if I should trade in the EVO9 and M3 for one us these bad boys?
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: SithSolo1
Originally posted by: alkemyst
I don't think anyone is getting one for $70k.
So true, ours came to ~$73K plus tax and destination.![]()
WHAAAAT!?!?!
Pics or ban :laugh:
Originally posted by: Owls
Those are insane numbers. The real litmus test, however, will be the number of people willing to put down 70k for a Nissan. I'm not knocking Nissan, but there are people who would rather pay more for less, if you understand.
Unbelievable car, though. ALMOST makes me rethink my M3 purchase although I can't shove a baby seat in there![]()
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
Yeah, track conditions are a big question mark as well.
It seems unlikely that a RWD setup with the numbers on the ZR-1 could reach 7:29, but you never know.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
They have made some changes. They're no longer saying ZR1 is the fastest production car. :laugh:
Originally posted by: dawheat
Originally posted by: Arkaign
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
Yeah, track conditions are a big question mark as well.
It seems unlikely that a RWD setup with the numbers on the ZR-1 could reach 7:29, but you never know.
You mean like a Carrera GT![]()
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
They have made some changes. They're no longer saying ZR1 is the fastest production car. :laugh:
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
I love how angry little haters don't come back to threads like this after they've had their angry little hating stance put on a pedestal and shot down
Amazing car, what more can you say?
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
I love how angry little haters don't come back to threads like this after they've had their angry little hating stance put on a pedestal and shot down
Amazing car, what more can you say?
I can't help but feel that Nissan is keeping the price ridiculously low for the same reason stated above. They could easily sell the GTR for a good $100k and no one would blink.
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: mcturkey
Can't wait for official times for the ZR-1. Hats off to Nissan for this. It's great that there are an increasing number of reasonably* priced supercars spanking the bejesus out of the high-end exotics.
*reasonable being defined as under $100k.
The ZR1 has been hand timed at ~7:40, whether the driver was pushing the car to its limits is questionable. A ZR1 engineer was quoted as saying that the ZR1 will beat any production car on any track in the world. I'm guessing they'll have to make some changes now...
They have made some changes. They're no longer saying ZR1 is the fastest production car. :laugh:
http://www.autoblog.com/2008/0...ing-of-the-ring-for-l/
The Nissan GT-R's 7:29 lap record won't stand for long if Chevrolet has anything to say about it. Speaking with InsideLine, Corvette Chief Engineer, Tadge Jeuchter, says that the ZR1, "will be able to take the production-car track record at any racetrack," and that although Chevy doesn't have a production version of the uber-Vette at the Nurburgring yet, they're expecting a lap time of "seven minutes, twenty-something seconds." That sounds like smack-talk to us. But while the ZR1 might have the potential to best the GT-R's 'Ring time, the 550-600 hp elephant in the room is the forthcoming GT-R V-Spec, which is already putting down (roughly-timed) laps around the North Loop in the 7:25 realm. Let the battle begin. We're making popcorn now.
Originally posted by: Owls
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
I love how angry little haters don't come back to threads like this after they've had their angry little hating stance put on a pedestal and shot down
Amazing car, what more can you say?
Don't be a self absorbed idiot. I'm a car lover first. I'm not a "fanboi" of any car and I was as skeptical as anyone else when they saw the time. I merely wanted a logical explanation and I was educated about it. End of story.
Seriously, how small IS your penis?
Originally posted by: Pariah
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
I love how angry little haters don't come back to threads like this after they've had their angry little hating stance put on a pedestal and shot down
Amazing car, what more can you say?
You can say the time is probably bogus. Was anyone not from Nissan there to verify the run? Whether or not the actual time was achieved, I think it has already been pretty well established that Nissan at the very least understated the specs of the car. It's probably putting down closer to 480HP at the wheels than the crank. If the GT-R is really producing about 550HP, then its physics defying times become more realistic. Didn't Nissan also claim one of the previous generation Skylines broke 8 minutes at the ring, which raised more than a few eyebrows.
I can't help but feel that Nissan is keeping the price ridiculously low for the same reason stated above. They could easily sell the GTR for a good $100k and no one would blink.
With such low production numbers (about 1500 annual) and it being a halo car, it's certainly not beyond the realm of possibility that Nissan is selling these at a loss. Bugatti is reportedly losing money on every Veyron it sells, and that car's over $1 million. If Nissan can build such an uber hypercar slayer for $70k and turn a respectable profit, why is the 350z such a piece of garbage relatively speaking at half the price?
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
I love how angry little haters don't come back to threads like this after they've had their angry little hating stance put on a pedestal and shot down
Amazing car, what more can you say?
Don't be a self absorbed idiot. I'm a car lover first. I'm not a "fanboi" of any car and I was as skeptical as anyone else when they saw the time. I merely wanted a logical explanation and I was educated about it. End of story.
Seriously, how small IS your penis?
:laugh:
The connection between wangs and your angsty squawking isn't immediately obvious, care to elaborate?
Originally posted by: Pariah
Originally posted by: dug777
Originally posted by: Owls
I did some more research..
The Zonda F is about 600 hp and weighs 2700 lb and completes the lap in just about the exact same time. That represents nearly a 45% power to weight advantage for the Zonda.
Personally, I don't believe this garbage because something is definitely going on.
I love how angry little haters don't come back to threads like this after they've had their angry little hating stance put on a pedestal and shot down
Amazing car, what more can you say?
You can say the time is probably bogus. Was anyone not from Nissan there to verify the run? Whether or not the actual time was achieved, I think it has already been pretty well established that Nissan at the very least understated the specs of the car. It's probably putting down closer to 480HP at the wheels than the crank. If the GT-R is really producing about 550HP, then its physics defying times become more realistic. Didn't Nissan also claim one of the previous generation Skylines broke 8 minutes at the ring, which raised more than a few eyebrows.
I can't help but feel that Nissan is keeping the price ridiculously low for the same reason stated above. They could easily sell the GTR for a good $100k and no one would blink.
With such low production numbers (about 1500 annual) and it being a halo car, it's certainly not beyond the realm of possibility that Nissan is selling these at a loss. Bugatti is reportedly losing money on every Veyron it sells, and that car's over $1 million. If Nissan can build such an uber hypercar slayer for $70k and turn a respectable profit, why is the 350z such a piece of garbage relatively speaking at half the price?
I posted a similar post in an earlier GTR thread. You can see that the GTR is not as underrated as you think (ie, not close to 550 hp as posted by Pariah). Simply put, look at the trap speeds in comparison tests, cars with approx. 500 hp (ie stock z06) post massively higher speeds in the quarter. Beyond 100mph the GTR isnt even close.
