- Apr 5, 2004
- 4,426
- 0
- 76
Which card would you recommend for battlefield 3? My monitor is 1920x1200, i5-2500k cpu and 850W PSU. I also have $190 in credit at amazon and would like stay around $350 for the card.
Yeah.. if you go with Ultra and use MSAA, then Nvidia has better performance/$.
If you use FXAA (instead of say MSAA) then its AMD, that offers most perf/$.
Exsample without MSAA:
![]()
without MSAA a much cheaper 6970 is neck to neck with a 580.
Like I mentioned in the BF3 thread in PC Gaming. MSAA's visual impact does not justify it's performance hit in game engines that use deferred rendering. It does not apply anti aliasing to every object on the screen while fxaa/mlaa do.
Whatever, with 4MSAA it looks waaay better than only with postAA. But anyway we should tell OP that if he wants to run the game at 60FPS then 4MSAA will not even come into question for any of the 2 cards.
I can't remember exactly how MSAA works in DICE games, but I'm almost positive it only works on the weapon model in front of the player. If you was -20fps for that then by all means...
Any other visual improvement you're seeing is a placebo.
Do you have the game? Have you played with/without MSAA? I can tell you that all the wires, electricity poles, wire fences and such suffer from atrocious jaggies without MSAA. Even worse if you play on High.
umm why not just go buy HD 7970 ? its the fastest card available now
That's probably why...^_^I also have $190 in credit at amazon and would like stay around $350 for the card.
Kami, the OP said 6970 or 570....
Depends on whether you use FXAA or MSAA.
My monitor is 1920x1200
