Originally posted by: Genx87
This would mean that Nvidia's efficiency per clock cycle must be at least 50% better than ATIs just to equal the performance of the GPU alone.
One has to look at the 5900s who had half the pixel pipelines and a 20% increase in clock to see if Nvidia is really more efficient. 5900s for the most part could keep up with the 9800 Pros. I would imagine the 6800s will be the same.
Even though ATI is going to use an older architectue I doubt Nvidia does 50% more work per clock cycle in comparison to a 9800Pro/XT. Look at the benchmarks,
Remember Nvidia has half the pixel pipes on the 5900s vs the 9800 and a 20% clock increase. It should be a wash at best.
Originally posted by: render
From what i've seen the Tagan is prolly the best PS you can buy. If u really need it, thats another question.
No, it's not all that great.
http://forums.silentpcreview.com/viewtopic.php?t=11468
http://forums.silentpcreview.com/viewtopic.php?t=9692
Agreed. I'm certain I can find far more gripes about the Antecs simply due to the number in use. I'm certain Tagan is an excellent PSU if the percentages are examined.Originally posted by: Operandi
Originally posted by: render
From what i've seen the Tagan is prolly the best PS you can buy. If u really need it, thats another question.
No, it's not all that great.
http://forums.silentpcreview.com/viewtopic.php?t=11468
http://forums.silentpcreview.com/viewtopic.php?t=9692
Ok so they aren't perfect... But it sounds like those are pretty isolated cases.