• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

67yo Great Great Grandmother....

Jugernot

Diamond Member
I could really care less about the actual story in the article.... I just stopped and was flabbergasted that this woman is a 67yo Great great grandmother.

This woman was born in 1940... so if you average it out, each generation would have had a baby no later than 16.75yo. WTF has this freaking country come to when this is still happening.

KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS PEOPLE!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/...ntervictims/index.html

PS: I am 26, my parents are 58, my grand parents are 83 & 78.
 
The phrase is "I couldn't care less". That is so irritating because it isn't just a simple typo. It's a complete failure of logic.
 
im 26 and my rents are 60 and 54, only living grandmother is 94 :Q, she is a GGGM, my sister is 28 and has a 9 month old

yea its a bit odd, when i was in HS they had a pic in the paper of some faimily that showed 10 FING GENERATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Originally posted by: MrDudeMan
The phrase is "I couldn't care less". That is so irritating because it isn't just a simple typo - it's a complete failure of logic.

Well said... mission accomplished for the day!
 
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I could really care less about the actual story in the article.... I just stopped and was flabbergasted that this woman is a 67yo Great great grandmother.

This woman was born in 1940... so if you average it out, each generation would have had a baby no later than 16.75yo. WTF has this freaking country come to when this is still happening.

KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS PEOPLE!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/...ntervictims/index.html

PS: I am 26, my parents are 58, my grand parents are 83 & 78.

If they can afford it, then more power to them.
 
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I could really care less about the actual story in the article.... I just stopped and was flabbergasted that this woman is a 67yo Great great grandmother.

This woman was born in 1940... so if you average it out, each generation would have had a baby no later than 16.75yo. WTF has this freaking country come to when this is still happening.

KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS PEOPLE!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/...ntervictims/index.html

PS: I am 26, my parents are 58, my grand parents are 83 & 78.

I was a great uncle at 23.
 
Originally posted by: StinkyPinky
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I could really care less about the actual story in the article.... I just stopped and was flabbergasted that this woman is a 67yo Great great grandmother.

This woman was born in 1940... so if you average it out, each generation would have had a baby no later than 16.75yo. WTF has this freaking country come to when this is still happening.

KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS PEOPLE!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/...ntervictims/index.html

PS: I am 26, my parents are 58, my grand parents are 83 & 78.

I was a great uncle at 23.

my daughter has a uncle at 2.

aunt ucnle stuff is not that amazing..
 
$50 says her great-great-granddaughter will get knocked up before she's 14. Like mother, like daugther, like daughter, like daughter, like daughter. 😀
 
Originally posted by: Kadarin
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I could really care less about the actual story in the article.... I just stopped and was flabbergasted that this woman is a 67yo Great great grandmother.

This woman was born in 1940... so if you average it out, each generation would have had a baby no later than 16.75yo. WTF has this freaking country come to when this is still happening.

KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS PEOPLE!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/...ntervictims/index.html

PS: I am 26, my parents are 58, my grand parents are 83 & 78.

If they can afford it, then more power to them.

Yeah seriously, don't criticize people for screwing up their lives by having children while they're still in high school (or should be at least).
 
Originally posted by: Anubis
im 26 and my rents are 60 and 54, only living grandmother is 94 :Q, she is a GGGM, my sister is 28 and has a 9 month old

yea its a bit odd, when i was in HS they had a pic in the paper of some faimily that showed 10 FING GENERATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The math.... is not working.

 
Originally posted by: kranky
Originally posted by: Anubis
im 26 and my rents are 60 and 54, only living grandmother is 94 :Q, she is a GGGM, my sister is 28 and has a 9 month old

yea its a bit odd, when i was in HS they had a pic in the paper of some faimily that showed 10 FING GENERATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The math.... is not working.

I'd have to agree.... each generation would have been under 10yo assuming the oldest one is 100.
 
Originally posted by: Jugernot
I could really care less about the actual story in the article.... I just stopped and was flabbergasted that this woman is a 67yo Great great grandmother.

This woman was born in 1940... so if you average it out, each generation would have had a baby no later than 16.75yo. WTF has this freaking country come to when this is still happening.

KEEP IT IN YOUR PANTS PEOPLE!

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/...ntervictims/index.html

PS: I am 26, my parents are 58, my grand parents are 83 & 78.

yup, no doubt that is a bit excessive. my grandmother, my kids grandmother just turned 82 and my oldest is only 10 yrs old, my sisters oldest child is only 13 yrs old.


my grandmother will be in her mid 90's before she is a great great grandmother
 
Originally posted by: mugs
Yeah seriously, don't criticize people for screwing up their innocent children's lives by having children while they're still in high school (or should be at least).

Fixed
 
My wife's aunt might end up beating her by a few years. She had a daughter at 15, her daughter had a daughter at 15, and her daughter had a daughter at 15. If the trend continues she'll be a great great grandmother by 60. If she lives as long as that side of the family usually does and the trend continues she'll end up being a great great great great grandmother.
 
Back
Top