• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

6600GT benches

I'll take a 6800 GT instead. I figure I'll be able to get one for $350 retail by Christmas... and if I get this job at a computer store, I'll get it at cost, which should be under $300 by then.
 
Looks like a good card for my little bro to buy to replace his 9000 Pro and still be able to outclass my other brother's 9800 Pro. 😛
 
At MSRP, the SLI of 6600GT will be MUCH better. double the numbers in each benchmark, and it will outperform a 6800 ultra easily. 2x $220= $440 for much higher performance. 16k in 3dmark03...

its 43 fps at 1600x1200. double that. its 86 fps, better than a ultra can do.
 
Originally posted by: hugobomber
At MSRP, the SLI of 6600GT will be MUCH better. double the numbers in each benchmark, and it will outperform a 6800 ultra easily. 2x $220= $440 for much higher performance. 16k in 3dmark03...

its 43 fps at 1600x1200. double that. its 86 fps, better than a ultra can do.

SLI does not = double performance
 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: hugobomber
At MSRP, the SLI of 6600GT will be MUCH better. double the numbers in each benchmark, and it will outperform a 6800 ultra easily. 2x $220= $440 for much higher performance. 16k in 3dmark03...

its 43 fps at 1600x1200. double that. its 86 fps, better than a ultra can do.

SLI does not = double performance

Aye, it'll be somewhere around 25% to 35% more, depending on the app.
 
SLI timetable == when the PCIE cards and platforms come out. AFAIK All PCIE cards 6600GT or higher will be SLI capable out of the box.
 
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
I'll take a 6800 GT instead. I figure I'll be able to get one for $350 retail by Christmas... and if I get this job at a computer store, I'll get it at cost, which should be under $300 by then.

cost is under $300 now....
 
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
I'll take a 6800 GT instead. I figure I'll be able to get one for $350 retail by Christmas... and if I get this job at a computer store, I'll get it at cost, which should be under $300 by then.

cost is under $300 now....

6800GTs are not under 300
 
Originally posted by: eVaoVe
Originally posted by: shady06
Originally posted by: Jeff7181
I'll take a 6800 GT instead. I figure I'll be able to get one for $350 retail by Christmas... and if I get this job at a computer store, I'll get it at cost, which should be under $300 by then.

cost is under $300 now....

6800GTs are not under 300

yes they are, at cost
 
Well, $200 is my sweet spot for video cards. I will have to stick with a 6600GT unless I can find someone in the FS/FT forum to let me have a 6800GT for that price. :brokenheart:
 
Originally posted by: VeZ
if only this wsa 256 bit...will there be much of a difference between 128 bit and 256?

Depends. 5800Us with 500/1000 clocks (128bit) generally equalled or outperformed 5900XTs 400/700(256 bit).

Clock speeds equal, 256bit would be better of course.

As far as "GTs are a better value" goes, GTs are MSRP $399.99. These cards are MSRP $199.99. Not many people with $400 to spend on GTs will consider this card at all, and vice versa. You can't really speculate on what cards will cost in a month or two as supply/demand will set the price.

 
Originally posted by: Schadenfroh
Originally posted by: hugobomber
At MSRP, the SLI of 6600GT will be MUCH better. double the numbers in each benchmark, and it will outperform a 6800 ultra easily. 2x $220= $440 for much higher performance. 16k in 3dmark03...

its 43 fps at 1600x1200. double that. its 86 fps, better than a ultra can do.

SLI does not = double performance

Yes, SLI guarantees a MAXIMUM of 1.7 times the performance in only optimal situations. 1.5 times the performance is a much more reasonable number. Nothing to sneeze at, thats a real nice boost for an upgrade option.

 
Maybe we will start to see 6850's/GT's/Ultra's using the 110nm process for fall refresh. Those clockspeeds on the 6600 cores look very promising.
 
Originally posted by: Falloutboy
I wounder how well these babies will overclock

They OC in the review.

From the 500/1000 default clocks they got to 550/1100, and the OCed 6600GT passed the stock X800Pro in 3dm'03 and aquamark3 not that it matters 😛

One interesting note though is that the vanilla 6600 actually also made it to 550mhz... from a stock of 300mhz, thats like a 80% GPU OC :Q
 
Back
Top