Isn't it possible that the way TSMC is trying to go beyond 3nm is just harder than what Intel has already researched to be feasible and achievable?Assuming that Intel is solving with ease the challenges TSMC is having - or is able to, with ease, leapfrog TSMC to GAA.
While it is within realm of possibilities, I think it is unlikely.
Friendly reminder that Intel's node development woes are not over just because they're talking about an aggressive schedule. The node they currently refer to as "Intel 4" is 12 months late relative to their own internal target, and 6 months late to the market. Granite Rapids was initially spotted in their roadmaps as a 2022 product, later made public as a 2023 product on Intel 4, now slated for 2024 on Intel 3.Isn't it possible that the way TSMC is trying to go beyond 3nm is just harder than what Intel has already researched to be feasible and achievable?
Isn't it possible that the way TSMC is trying to go beyond 3nm is just harder than what Intel has already researched to be feasible and achievable?
Find what happens next in... the Intel thread.Surely Intel executives won't make the same mistake twice, right? RIGHT???
Mistake?Surely Intel executives won't make the same mistake twice, right? RIGHT???
Whatever it was, that led to the 10nm delays. I'm guessing they will think twice before repeating that, lest they get stuck for another 2 years with poor yields.Mistake?
I'm skeptical that it will be widely available. Whatever limited quantities they are able to muster will be picked up by scalpers by the truckload. My guess is that it will end up being more expensive than the 12900KS, thanks mainly to scalpers.Would this 20% also be applied to the 5800X3D?
Would this 20% also be applied to the 5800X3D?
![]()
AMD Milan-X EPYC 7003X CPUs Are About 20% More Expensive Than Standard Milan Chips While Offering 3x More Cache
AMD unveiled its 3rd Gen EPYC 7003X Milan-X CPUs back in November and are now shipping to data center customers around the world.wccftech.com
Would it benefit AMD to have a celery version of their X3D release?
Would it benefit AMD to have a celery version of their X3D release? Maybe a Ryzen 7 5600X3D or Ryzen 5 5600X3D, with half the V cache, would fit the naming scheme.
AMD needs a less complicated naming scheme in the future. The naming convention by AMD that led to Zen 3 Ryzen 7 5800X3D is just awkward at this point.
I'm interested in knowing how many people here are holding out on an upgrade due to waiting for the 5800X3D. Please raise your hands.
If you want 64GB RAM or more at a good price, the 5800X3D should be good for you for at least 3 years or so before you feel the need to upgrade, assuming the V-cache is useful in your workloads. Otherwise, better to wait for AM5.the 5800X is fast enough for what I do but I have low level tech addictions so I'll probably jump on one. I'm predicting I'll have buyers remorse when AM5 hits, haha