• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

6420 vs 6400

Pretty much only two things benefit from having the extra cache-- SuperPi 1m and video encoding. Although, when working with very large audio files, it also helps. For nearly all other real world apps, it makes hardly any difference.
 
I saw some guy do a test where 32m superpi at the same speeds only gave a 7 second difference. But if you can wait why not get that 7 second boost.
 
Originally posted by: ineedaname
I saw some guy do a test where 32m superpi at the same speeds only gave a 7 second difference. But if you can wait why not get that 7 second boost.

I've seen as small as 2-3 seconds for superpi 32M for a 2M L2 chip vs. 4M L2 chip.

If you're a hardcore bencher, the 4M L2 is what you need, else 2M L2 should be fine for you but nothing wrong with getting the 6420 as it will cost the same as the current 6400. it's just a matter of... can you wait. 🙂 If you can, go with the 6420, if not go with the 6400.
 
If you are using your PC for actual applications and gaming other than those mentioned above, who cares how fast it can compute certain values of Pi?
 
Back
Top