Wait, you said you paid 1800$ for your 32-core in the other thread!Well, since their 32 core is $4000, I would guess that it would be $6-8000
Wait, you said you paid 1800$ for your 32-core in the other thread!Well, since their 32 core is $4000, I would guess that it would be $6-8000
Wait, you said you paid 1800$ for your 32-core in the other thread!
Yes, and part of that is 8 channel memory, only on EPYCHe bought a threadripper, Epyc chips are more expensive.
Where did you find that? That's ~30% faster per core per clock than what a dual socket EPYC 7601 system (with a base clock of 2.2) can do. Realistically, some of that is probably turbo over the 1.8GHz base so the IPC improvement won't be that drastic. Still, that's quite encouraging.
whats wrong with the second one ? looks to me like its captured multiple screen refreshes thats why the center of the render is bright and the outside of it is dull.While 1st pic of that 128C Epyc seems well done, 2nd pic give it away. Cinebech starts new rendering threads clockwise and there are disjointed tiles on the bottom right of that pic where there should be none.
I call it a fake ...
whats wrong with the second one ? looks to me like its captured multiple screen refreshes thats why the center of the render is bright and the outside of it is dull.
edit: if you watch this slowly you can see that what i say above aligns with this render in terms of what it renders when:
R15 V4.5 Quad Xeon Platinum 8180
That would be an interesting theory catching two refreshes with a single pucture, but probability of it happening is low. Other than someone recorded video of that run, compressed it and then took pictures of said video played back.
I must say, numbers alighn with what Zen could and should do, just that I tend to be suspicious about these early leaks.