5th iran cable cut???

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

redly

Golden Member
Nov 15, 2004
1,159
0
0
I am reading alot of vague speculation and poor attempts at humor...but seriously, what is the leading theory behind why the 5 cables were cut? Is there any credible information to back anything up?
 

Jaskalas

Lifer
Jun 23, 2004
33,493
7,547
136
Originally posted by: Skoorb
OH SNAP THIS IT IT BOYS NUKE-UH-LAR FRICKIN WAR!!!

Hold that thought until AFTER we give them time to develop some weapons.

As for the cables, this is messed up. We need a team of specialists to lay a trap at the likely targets and figure out who is doing this. It damn well better not be us, without damn good reason.

Unless there is some extraordinary (and valid) explanation, whoever is doing this needs to be executed.
 

NaughtyGeek

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,065
0
71
Originally posted by: redly
I am reading alot of vague speculation and poor attempts at humor...but seriously, what is the leading theory behind why the 5 cables were cut? Is there any credible information to back anything up?

Seeing as this is being ignored by the major media, I find it unlikely that you'll hear any "credible" theories in the near future. At this point, I can't help but lean towards others thinking that it's related to the Iranian Oil Bourse. A great deal of middle men stand to get cut out of the oil loop if the Iranians are successful in implementing their Bourse. Alas, we will continue to only be able to speculate.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
IMO, this too many for a coincidence.

The theory of ship anchor has been debunked.

I'm gonna guess a submarine, and that is it intentional.

Fern
 

blackangst1

Lifer
Feb 23, 2005
22,914
2,359
126
Originally posted by: NaughtyGeek
Originally posted by: redly
I am reading alot of vague speculation and poor attempts at humor...but seriously, what is the leading theory behind why the 5 cables were cut? Is there any credible information to back anything up?

Seeing as this is being ignored by the major media, I find it unlikely that you'll hear any "credible" theories in the near future. At this point, I can't help but lean towards others thinking that it's related to the Iranian Oil Bourse. A great deal of middle men stand to get cut out of the oil loop if the Iranians are successful in implementing their Bourse. Alas, we will continue to only be able to speculate.

The only hole in this argument is why cut off UAE and India? India of course being a HUGE financial center for the US. It's like chopping off your head because of one pimple.
 

Skitzer

Diamond Member
Mar 20, 2000
4,415
3
81
Originally posted by: Fern
IMO, this too many for a coincidence.

The theory of ship anchor has been debunked.

I'm gonna guess a submarine, and that is it intentional.

Fern

Ok, I'll bite ........ whose sub and why?
 

CitizenKain

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2000
4,480
14
76
Funny how if you read farther into the article it turns out to be something completely different. Keep on truckin' tin-foilers.
 

glugglug

Diamond Member
Jun 9, 2002
5,340
1
81
I'd wager:
500:1 the U.S. is responsible (and it's intentional)
200:1 the true reason we went to war with Iraq was also to keep them from trading oil in non-$$ currencies.
20:1 Interfering with India's internet connection will ultimately cost American jobs when they start outsourcing to the U.S, since the dollar isn't going to stay above the Rupee much longer.
15:1 the catalyst for this action is the oil bourse
5:1 not long from now, when Iran gets its internet back, massive funding will be use researching the question "Is it more economical to drill for oil through sand or through glass?"
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: Skitzer
Originally posted by: Fern
IMO, this too many for a coincidence.

The theory of ship anchor has been debunked.

I'm gonna guess a submarine, and that is it intentional.

Fern

Ok, I'll bite ........ whose sub and why?

[Puts on tin foil hat and responds]

I've since read that the ME traffic is now routed through US and British cables. With FISA modified that means we can intercept communications and gather intel.

Fern
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Skitzer
Originally posted by: Fern
IMO, this too many for a coincidence.

The theory of ship anchor has been debunked.

I'm gonna guess a submarine, and that is it intentional.

Fern

Ok, I'll bite ........ whose sub and why?

[Puts on tin foil hat and responds]

I've since read that the ME traffic is now routed through US and British cables. With FISA modified that means we can intercept communications and gather intel.

Fern
We can already monitor that traffic without cutting into the cables.

Besides, if we were to do that for eavesdropping purposes wouldn't we try to do it without anyone noticing in the first place?

Of course, assuming they actually find out the cause of the cables being cut it's too late anyway. The CTs are already on the prowl so any reason given that doesn't involve a conspiracy at the highest levels of US government will automatically be deemed a coverup.
 

HeXploiT

Diamond Member
Jun 11, 2004
4,359
1
76
Originally posted by: blackangst1
Originally posted by: NaughtyGeek
Originally posted by: redly
I am reading alot of vague speculation and poor attempts at humor...but seriously, what is the leading theory behind why the 5 cables were cut? Is there any credible information to back anything up?

Seeing as this is being ignored by the major media, I find it unlikely that you'll hear any "credible" theories in the near future. At this point, I can't help but lean towards others thinking that it's related to the Iranian Oil Bourse. A great deal of middle men stand to get cut out of the oil loop if the Iranians are successful in implementing their Bourse. Alas, we will continue to only be able to speculate.

The only hole in this argument is why cut off UAE and India? India of course being a HUGE financial center for the US. It's like chopping off your head because of one pimple.

You can't cut off Iran and not effect other nations. These are cables that many nations share. Each nation does not have its own set of cables.
 

Aimster

Lifer
Jan 5, 2003
16,129
2
0
It's probably Israel.

It's not like any of those nations that are primary targets give a rat's ass about Israel.

Way to own them all.
 

Fern

Elite Member
Sep 30, 2003
26,907
173
106
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Skitzer
Originally posted by: Fern
IMO, this too many for a coincidence.

The theory of ship anchor has been debunked.

I'm gonna guess a submarine, and that is it intentional.

Fern

Ok, I'll bite ........ whose sub and why?

[Puts on tin foil hat and responds]

I've since read that the ME traffic is now routed through US and British cables. With FISA modified that means we can intercept communications and gather intel.

Fern
We can already monitor that traffic without cutting into the cables.

Well damn, if that's true my conspiracy's blown right outta the water.

(But I still think it too many to be a coincidence)

Fern
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Aimster
It's probably Israel.

It's not like any of those nations that are primary targets give a rat's ass about Israel.

Way to own them all.

OMG IT'S THE JEWS
 

Socio

Golden Member
May 19, 2002
1,730
2
81
Maybe it is the RIAA stepping up their efforts to stop MP3 downloading music pirates over there.
 

jonks

Lifer
Feb 7, 2005
13,918
20
81
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Aimster
It's probably Israel.

It's not like any of those nations that are primary targets give a rat's ass about Israel.

Way to own them all.

OMG IT'S THE JEWS

Clearly. This was a tragic cable-circumcision gone awry.
 

vhx

Golden Member
Jul 19, 2006
1,151
0
0
Lawl 5 down in a week and no news stations even report it.

Is it me or does that just demonstrate the news only reports what they are told? Something this big should have been reported long ago?
 

NaughtyGeek

Golden Member
May 3, 2005
1,065
0
71
Originally posted by: vhx
Lawl 5 down in a week and no news stations even report it.

Is it me or does that just demonstrate the news only reports what they are told? Something this big should have been reported long ago?

No, no, no. You've got it all wrong. It's not that they've been told not to report it, it just pales in significance to Britney's hospital stay or Heath's death. Geesh!
 

BoomerD

No Lifer
Feb 26, 2006
63,057
11,419
136
In the OT thread, I suggested that perhaps this was a way for GWB to cut off Osama Bin Forgotten's internet access. (or for that matter, Al Queda in general) ;)

OR, since it's taken India out of the loop, so to speak, MAYBE it's a bunch of pissed off customer service people whose jobs were outsourced to India...(them geeks can git perty ingeenus" :D
 

palehorse

Lifer
Dec 21, 2005
11,521
0
76
Originally posted by: Perry404
Originally posted by: palehorse74
Another take:
http://www.khaleejtimes.com/Di...155.xml&section=theuae
The experts also suggested that the cause of damage could have been a ship?s anchor that was dragging due to inclement weather conditions in the region during that particular period.

You've got to be kidding me? Five cables? I think that's the most brilliant idea I've ever heard.
I certainly didnt say I agreed with their lame excuse... I simply found it in my wandering and shared the translation here for people to see how some ME media outlets are covering the issue.

I'm pretty damn sure that they have enough common sense to know that the "boat prop theory" is grade-A bullsh*t... at least I hope so! LOL...
 
Sep 12, 2004
16,852
59
86
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Originally posted by: Fern
Originally posted by: Skitzer
Originally posted by: Fern
IMO, this too many for a coincidence.

The theory of ship anchor has been debunked.

I'm gonna guess a submarine, and that is it intentional.

Fern

Ok, I'll bite ........ whose sub and why?

[Puts on tin foil hat and responds]

I've since read that the ME traffic is now routed through US and British cables. With FISA modified that means we can intercept communications and gather intel.

Fern
We can already monitor that traffic without cutting into the cables.

Well damn, if that's true my conspiracy's blown right outta the water.

(But I still think it too many to be a coincidence)

Fern
I agree it's no coincidence. Two could have been a coincidence. Three makes a hmmm. Four is a WTF. Five indicates that there's most likely some sort of sabotage with a purpose behind it.

It's probable that the explanation for the cables being cut is a bit more mundane than espionage or interfering in Iran's oil sales though. A new contract was signed recently between France and Egypt to lay a new cable between the two countries. No doubt some sort of conspiracy theory could be generated based on that news as well. However, the vast majority of the time conspiracies are just plain wrong and I don't tend to hedge my bets or dwell on .001% possibilities. I doubt you do either.