• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

5900 Ultra- Price is no object

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: Shamrock
BF1942

1600x1200 @85hz 8xAA/8xAF

I am a sniper so...

playing regular....15-19fps
zoomed up on scope.....35-38fps

BUT, BF42 utilizes ALOT of CPU...so you need a BIG cpu, ALOT of RAM, and a good vid card

since I only have an AMD Athlon XP 2200+, and 512 RAM, it might be hindered a bit.

I get more FPS with my 1700+ and Radeon 8500! 30 to 40fps!
 
I've been playing 1600x1200 in Battlefield. No AA or AF though. Looks great and since I have a 17" monitor on it for the moment with that resolution and the fact the screen is small not much need for AA or AF anyway IMO.
 
in ur case AF would be more appropiate, because once u run into the monitor's res limit, AA quality is more unoticable
 
Originally posted by: Tabb
Originally posted by: Shamrock
BF1942

1600x1200 @85hz 8xAA/8xAF

I am a sniper so...

playing regular....15-19fps
zoomed up on scope.....35-38fps

BUT, BF42 utilizes ALOT of CPU...so you need a BIG cpu, ALOT of RAM, and a good vid card

since I only have an AMD Athlon XP 2200+, and 512 RAM, it might be hindered a bit.

I get more FPS with my 1700+ and Radeon 8500! 30 to 40fps!

I doubt it, not at these settings 1600x1200 @85hz 8xAA/8xAF

and I do get 35-38 when I zoom up on my scope
 
Back
Top