.577 T-rex rifle

KK

Lifer
Jan 2, 2001
15,903
4
81
Link

I've never heard of this caliber before, I guess there's a reason for that.
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
That guy at the end is a huge badass.

Or he knows how to shoulder a rifle and had a proper stance.

But most likely he's just a huge badass.
 

Demon-Xanth

Lifer
Feb 15, 2000
20,551
2
81
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
That guy at the end is a huge badass.

Or he knows how to shoulder a rifle and had a proper stance.

But most likely he's just a huge badass.

Looking at the stances and how they held the rifle, you could tell who was going to have more problems than the others. His stance and grip was most definately better suited than the others.
 
Jun 27, 2005
19,216
1
61
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
That guy at the end is a huge badass.

Or he knows how to shoulder a rifle and had a proper stance.

But most likely he's just a huge badass.

Oh man... a bunch of those guys had no clue how to shoulder a large calibre weapon like that. I knew they were going down by they way the held the rifle. I doubt any of them (except the last guy) spent much time around firearms before they shot that monster.

I want one. :D

(Never know when scientists are going to find some DNA and unleash something on us)
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,790
2,620
126
1) That would have been better w/o the music.

2) The video was also too long.

3) For some reason I thought the maximum legal caliber for civilians w/o paperwork was .50 cal.

4) Profit.
 

Calin

Diamond Member
Apr 9, 2001
3,112
0
0
Originally posted by: upsciLLion
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
That guy at the end is a huge badass.

Or he knows how to shoulder a rifle and had a proper stance.

But most likely he's just a huge badass.

He shot it before, he knew what to expect
 
Feb 24, 2001
14,513
4
81
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
1) That would have been better w/o the music.

2) The video was also too long.

3) For some reason I thought the maximum legal caliber for civilians w/o paperwork was .50 cal.

4) Profit.

IIRC, on point 3, if it's for "sporting purposes" over .50 doesn't qualify as a destructive device.
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
I remember seeing a snippet of video from that same facility years ago, with what I assume was the same rifle, where one of the Muslim guys was thrown back with enough force to break the glass of the door. I wonder why they didn't include that part.
 

upsciLLion

Diamond Member
Feb 21, 2001
5,947
1
81
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
IIRC, on point 3, if it's for "sporting purposes" over .50 doesn't qualify as a destructive device.

Correct. 12 gauge shotgun slugs are .729 inches in diameter and are quite legal.
 

mad0maxx

Senior member
Feb 3, 2006
814
0
0
Originally posted by: Amused
Originally posted by: LordMorpheus
That guy at the end is a huge badass.

The guy at the end is shooting a different gun.

That guy at the end is indeed shooting a different gun and you can clearly see it in the middle where the bullet pops out on the last guys gun there is a silver part while everybody's gun before him does not have that silver part... plus the last guys gun was much bigger!
 

FelixDeCat

Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
30,790
2,620
126
Originally posted by: BrunoPuntzJones
Originally posted by: FelixDeKat
1) That would have been better w/o the music.

2) The video was also too long.

3) For some reason I thought the maximum legal caliber for civilians w/o paperwork was .50 cal.

4) Profit.

IIRC, on point 3, if it's for "sporting purposes" over .50 doesn't qualify as a destructive device.


So if I want to buy an M61 Vulcan Mini-Gun that fires 20mm rounds @ $15 a round (inert price!) and can find a "sporting purpose" for it, that baby is mine? :confused:

Shens.