• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

53 year old man poops in diaper...held on child endangerment charges

Yeh. Like trying to fine this guy $75,000 really does ANYONE any good. Laugh it up, and get on with your life.
 
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?
 
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?
Click to expand...

i don't understand what's going on either
 
Originally posted by: beatle
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?
Click to expand...

Kind of my thought also. How was this endangering anyone?
 
I can't believe the news station used the word "poop." That's despicable. They could have at least substituted it with "defecated."
 
hes obviously a mental case, and this is an excuse to get him off the streets. pink stretch pants with a diaper? no sane 55 year old man, or anyone of any age or sex for that matter, would wear that to try and get a job at a school, sh!t themselves, and then go wander around the super market. i would think crazy people could be seen as a danger to anyone, really.
 
1) Why is this child endangerment? The news must have left something out.
2) By law you must give EVERYONE that asks a job application. It is your right to throw the completed application away, but you must allow people to fill one out. The school is probably looking at a lawsuit.
 
Originally posted by: jumpr
I can't believe the news station used the word "poop." That's despicable. They could have at least substituted it with "defecated."
Click to expand...

Eh, seems like all the "Bizarre News" stories are written in the same sort of style, and it's all AP anyway.

I noticed the same thing, though. I liked it.
 
Originally posted by: CPA
Originally posted by: beatle
I don't understand at all... how did he endanger anyone? He crapped his pants. So what?
Click to expand...

Kind of my thought also. How was this endangering anyone?
Click to expand...

I am confused too. He was wearing a diaper because he was old, so he pooped in it. Isn't that what a diaper is for?
 
Yeah, there's something missing from the story. The guy's a wacko but at least he wore a diaper. Oh wait...I'm not sure what's worse...the guy sh!tting his pants without a diaper or wearing a diaper in anticipation of sh!tting in them.
 
Originally posted by: cjchaps
I don't get it... if he wasn't wearing a diaper and pooped, that could be child endangerment, but he was wearing a deaper, so what's the problem?
Click to expand...

yeah i don't get it either
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top